What's your '07-08 off-season plan?
Because I'm currently lacking in creativity -- In a recent email to Jim, I said I could barely support a VH1 reality TV show with my current creative output -- and because I'm curious as to the different directions each of you would take this club, I'd like to hear your plan for the White Sox off-season were you the ultimate decision maker. Try to be realistic.
I'll put out my USSMariner-style (told you I wasn't creative) detailed, sanctioned off-season moves post by the end of the week. I encourage Jim and the recently awaken Jeeves to do the same on their respective blogs.
Also, there's a new poll. Assuming Ozzie Guillen is out -- He's too much of a Baseball A-Lister right now -- which current White Sox figure would make the best VH1-style reality show?
0 recs |
73 comments
Comments
AJ would have been perfect on the list
by omnipotent grab on Oct 31, 2007 4:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Added
by The Cheat on Oct 31, 2007 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good move
by omnipotent grab on Oct 31, 2007 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats what I said
by omnipotent grab on Oct 31, 2007 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm...
Then I'd dump Podsednik and Cintron.
Then I'd heavily shop Garland, Contreras, and Vazquez for as much young talent with as much upside as possible. I'd also look into moving Konerko for minor-leaguers.
But that's just me.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Oct 31, 2007 4:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
from your list
I'd do the same with the exception of not non-tender crede
and about jose, why not wait 1-2 months after the season starts?
he may show something before he takes his siesta on the rest of the season
by The Wizard on Oct 31, 2007 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and give the CF job to BA
by The Wizard on Oct 31, 2007 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BA would definetly be starting if
by omnipotent grab on Oct 31, 2007 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sweeney
by omnipotent grab on Oct 31, 2007 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd agree with all of that..
- I would trade Jenks now. He should bring back 2 up-the-middle players on the cusp of the majors.
- I would also field offers for John Danks. His stuff just isn't that great and his value will be lower if he puts up another close to 6 ERA next season.
by hitlesswonder on Oct 31, 2007 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, trading Danks
by colintj on Oct 31, 2007 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given full control?
- Garland and Konerko are going for the best possible packages.
- Try and bring Furcal over. He's set to make $13 million, so if the Sox took on the whole contract, I don't think they'd have to give up a heckuva lot in the way of players and prospects. Ideally a scenario would work itself out where the Sox can swap Contreras + 'spects for Furcal. I'd also look to extend Furcal for a couple more seasons (two-to-four years at reasonable money), as he just turned 30.
- No big contracts to any of Rowand, Hunter or Jones. Go out and find an undervalued CFer. I'd be supportive of the following: A Crisp trade or something similar to it or even giving Anderson one more shot with Owens getting a reasonable amount of spot starts.
- Bring in one of the former Sox starting pitchers who are free agents, Colon or Garcia. I think you can get both cheaply, and, while Garcia may not pitch a whole lot in 2008, I'd bank on a bounceback from him in 2009 (of course, the price has to be right).
by CWSKeith on Oct 31, 2007 5:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Still don't agree with you on
by colintj on Oct 31, 2007 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm awake and ready for some writing
by jeeves on Oct 31, 2007 6:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought he said be realistic?
In the process Ozzie is arrested for arson, (he tried to burn down your house) and in a furious attempt to attract fans disco demolition revisited is 1 of many old time promos designed to bring them back. My favorite will be the throwback uniforms of the softball shorts.
by Tdogg on Oct 31, 2007 6:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Attendance Figures
2006 2,957,414 (3rd of 14)
2005 2,342,833 (7th of 14)
2004 1,930,537 (8th of 14)
2003 1,939,524 (9th of 14)
2002 1,676,911 (10th of 14)
2001 1,766,172 (12th of 14)
2000 1,947,799 (9th of 14)
1999 1,338,851 (13th of 14)
It took too damn long to get here. The White Sox can not afford to cash in on purpose.
by Tdogg on Oct 31, 2007 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think my idea...
Losing Garland is going to hurt, but I think there's a team that'll eventually give up a good package of players for him, and I'd sacrafice some 2008 gain for some 2009-2012 gain.
My scenario has the Sox improving greatly in production at SS and LF (full year of Fields). I'd also expect a big improvement in CF if they got Crisp as well as 3B with a healthy Crede.
As I said, I think the rotation would take a hit. Losing Garland will hurt -- not only his average-ness but the innings. Then again, I can't imagine Gio or Egbert doing any worse than Contreras did last season. I'd also expect some slight improvement out of Danks.
One thing I didn't address was the bullpen. I wouldn't sign any free agents but would look for someone from the Asian market. Other than that I'd give Jenks/Logan/Wasserman their spots, give MacDougal and Thorton spots if they aren't traded, and let the rest settle itself through the guys we already have (Aardsma, Haeger, Perez).
by CWSKeith on Oct 31, 2007 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what was erstads option
just curious
by Jbasic89 on Oct 31, 2007 8:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The rankings are so crazy
Garland's gonna have to have a 2005-type season to make the jump to type-A status...
ON the SS front, Furcal is at the top of the B's, meaning he'd likely have to top his '06 season to regain Type A status.
Andruw Jones and Mike Cameron are type B, whereas Hunter and Rowand are type A.
Cameron, on a 1-2 year deal, coming off the stimulant suspension might be the bargain of the off-season.
by The Cheat on Oct 31, 2007 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
JD: Type A
by The Wizard on Oct 31, 2007 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so we're going to lose a pick if we sign
bleh.
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is Liriano a B?
Obviously, I'm missing something about these rankings.
by rhythm on Nov 1, 2007 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those rankings are goofy
by ChicagoPete on Nov 1, 2007 7:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha...
Buehrle should be a type A.
I really, really wish we'd let JD go. What a crock.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 1, 2007 7:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Torpeda Boat news / Hunter & Rowand news...
by SSH2005 on Nov 1, 2007 9:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This could turn into a debacle.
Rowand. Yuck.
by ballyb on Nov 1, 2007 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think KW is going to balk at the years
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
bally, whatever happened to
by winningugly on Nov 1, 2007 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's always lurking in the weeds.
by ballyb on Nov 1, 2007 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What was the story behind that?
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, so first things first
Of the current team, AJ, Paulie are under contract and JD will have a team option. JD's bat looked slow last year and I don't think he's going to be a contributor, so I'm declining that option. Paulie was basically an average 1B this year, so it's hard to imagine him being that three years hence. I'm going to hope he's willing to platoon and I'm also going to be looking for a trade.
As for prospects who's best case is contributor on that team:
C Francisco Hernandez - .277/.362/.413 is a pretty nice like for a 21 year old catcher and his peripherals are really nice (very small k-rate, good walk rate, good LD%). With a solid approach, it'll be all about whether he can hack it physically. Possible.
1B Chris Carter - Rare power for his age group, though not elite. Has yet to show K rate issues like most minor league power guys which also bodes well. He could definitely be an above average 1B, but that'll depend on maintaining his walk rates and propping up his power.
2B Danny Richar - I like him to rebound and become a solid 2B. If not him, then maybe Getz
3B Josh Fields - Hopefully he can stick it at 3B and cut his k rate. Not optimistic on the latter, but his power is obvious. Wouldn't take much for him to make the jump, so let's hope his football time set back his learning curve and he hasn't peaked physically/mentally.
SS Sergio Miranda - Far from a sure thing, but is supposedly a good SS despite struggles this year and hit .282/.384/.349. If he doesn't hit for more power, his OBP isn't going to stay that high because pitchers will just challenge him instead of feeling like he'll hurt them.
LF/RF - We've got a number of interesting guys coming out of the rookie ball, but by and large their number/age combos aren't that encouraging. A power hitting OF should be a target in the draft this year. Jose Martinez would go here, but he won't be ready by '10, imo.
CF John Shelby - Not a lot of 22 year old CF who post a .500+ SLG w/ a .200 ISO. The elite ones are in AA or better though, so he's still just a good prospect. Still very encouraging though.
DH Christian Marrero - Same age but a level behind Chris Carter. Had a comparable year and clearly broke out physically I think, but his actual prospect status is contingent upon scout approval and further success this year. Could be the lefty side of the Paulie '10 platoon. Is actually older that Chris Carter by 6 months.
I'm far from saying any of these guys are untouchable, but I would be looking to protect all of these guys, especially Shelby and Carter, who could both be above average at their positions.
So how are we going to go about fixing holes if I'm saying that basically all our decent minor league talent should be protected? I'm aiming for .500 with some chance to be 5-10 games better and we were 10 games under last year. That's a sizable turnaround.
Identifying exactly what went wrong offensively:
VORP by Position (if my math doesn't suck):
C: 5.4
1B: 25.4
2B: 3.2
3B: -3.8
SS: -7.1
LF: 0.5
CF: -2.9
RF: 12.2
DH: 47.4
Okay, so the amount we sucked in LF is by far the most offensive aspect of this, since filling left shouldn't be any harder than it is to nab an aging free agent who can still hit or go the freely available talent route. But damnit did Uribe suck ass.
The first is to keep Andy Gonzalez off the MLB team. He was so so so bad. It's really impressive just how terrible he was. We need to keep him far far away from Ozzie.
If Crede's healthy, he's going to be a huge step toward making this a good team again. His defense on the left side of the infield is huge for a team that, as someone cited here, strikes out the 4th least per 9. And because he's not going to be a negative VORP with the bat unless he's unhealthy. And I just posited that he was. I really don't know what the precedent is here. I know that back injuries don't get better, they're just either tolerable or they aren't. If the team looks like it can win 90, I'll hang onto him for fan loyalty purposes, but if it'll be lucky to crack 85, they'll understand.
1B Paulie
2B Richar
3B Crede
SS ???Uribe
LF Fields
CF ???
RF JD
DH Thome
I want to be able to take out Thome against lefties, fill CF and if there's a SS option that isn't David Eckstein, think long and hard about it. Inquire about:
Since it's already been brought up, I'd like to see what Ed Wade thought of Luke Scott for Contreras and Uribe to get Adam Everett too? That sounds like a pipe dream. Or maybe for Crede? I'm not sure what an exact value should be there, but he's in the very least the lefty half of an LF platoon after we ditch Crede and a power bat off the bat before. If he really doesn't think much of Scott though, we should definitely see what he thinks of Contreras or something.
Alexei Ramirez is definitely something to look into and someone, if the scouts determine that he's legit (re: average), that I would spend a good deal for a 26 year old. Does 10 mil/yr sound right? His WBC stats look good, but there were only 16 at bats. If it turns out he's more like Coco Crisp, then I'd still take that since I'd go after Coco if it didn't mean a 2010 guy.
If he'll take a 3-4 year deal, I'm in for Fukudome over Ramirez, since translating Japanese baseball is a lot easier. According to Clay Davenport it's slightly better than AAA. We can stick Fukudome in center and get above average production (say .270/.350/.440) instantly without paying too much (4/40-50M?).
Unless the Bill Hall for Garland deal goes through, I really don't see an alternative to Uribe at this point unless we try sliding Richar over and look for a 2B. I don't think that's a good idea.
So:
C AJ
1B Paulie
2B Richar
3B Crede
SS Uribe
LF Fields
CF Fukudome
RF Dye
DH Thome
once Crede gets flipped for an A-ball reliever, we look like:
C AJ
1B Paulie
2B Richar
3B Fields
SS Uribe
LF Scott
CF Fukudome
DH Thome
...Since I'll presume the Scott-for-Contreras went through, though I really have no idea how likely that is. Hall-for-Garland is probably more likely.
That gives us a good chance to be average everywhere on the diamond except wherever Fields plays and at short. Thome is still an above average DH and having Scott to play left so Fields can DH will make our production from that spot even higher. That can be an average offense, all told.
Having not traded Garland in this scenario, we go
1)Buehrle
2)Vazquez
3)Garland
4)Danks
5)Gio
That's a solid rotation, if not outstanding. Again, I think we can hit 80-85 wins with this rotation.
Bullpen: I dn. Assume some regression to the mean (since so many pitchers can't really be that bad) plus having Bobby means that we have a chance at an above average bullpen if we add a couple relievers. Supposedly there are some Japanese relievers on the market and they seem to pitch well for at least half a season before they get figured out, so let's do that? Okay.
With some patented Ozzie-luck, that can be an overly costly 87 win team that doesn't cost us minor leaguers.
Oh, since it seems like the Dodgers might be going into Acquire Veterans mode at the cost of their young talent (hired Torre, plus rumors), I'd see if I couldn't swing a Paulie-for-Hu deal. That would make us so much better at short and we could stick Luke Scott at first. Unlikely, but it's Ned Coletti, so I'm asking.
And I would think about trading John Danks. Egbert can probably come in and match his VORP this year and I'm betting that DLS moves quickly through the system and is ready for '09. Meanwhile, we'd get another position prospect. Like the McCarthy trade.
That's everything.
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 9:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, no.
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Humble, too.
by winningugly on Nov 1, 2007 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly it only extends to blog comments
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except for the bullpen:
by winningugly on Nov 1, 2007 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just didn't feel like parsing the
But I ain't paying for the schooling, dang nabbit.
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
vg Colin
by ChicagoPete on Nov 1, 2007 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be amazing.
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well take a stat class!
by ChicagoPete on Nov 1, 2007 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm graduatin' consarn it
BTW, ever heard Patton Oswalt on "Physics For Poets" ? He is a quality joke teller.
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
RC, that's residential college right?
Intro stats is easy, VERY basic math, no graphing calculators needed. They'll teach you about things like populations, valid sample sizes, standard deviations, regression analysis. It's all simple formulas and then you plug in the data, abracadabra. It's actually pretty interesting, especially since you're a baseball stats geek. You seem to understand the PECOTA percentiles, those are just "x" standard deviations from the mean.
by ChicagoPete on Nov 1, 2007 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The weird thing is that I know
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand the need to abbreviate
"dn"? Wow.
;)
by winningugly on Nov 1, 2007 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm talking 'bout my generation
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate how many typos that has.
by colintj on Nov 1, 2007 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yankees interested in Crede to replace A-Rod...
by SSH2005 on Nov 1, 2007 11:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
this is good
Does Boston have a good 3B a year or two away in their system? They seem to be locked and loaded at every position.
by ChicagoPete on Nov 1, 2007 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Boston will either re-sign Mike Lowell...
by SSH2005 on Nov 1, 2007 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's why I ask if they have a prospect ready
by ChicagoPete on Nov 1, 2007 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jed Lowrie is a middle infielder
I wonder about whether the Dodgers would sign Rodriguez and deal Andy LaRoche. He'd be more coveted than either Crede or Fields.
by asinwreck on Nov 1, 2007 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rumor mill
by winningugly on Nov 1, 2007 12:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Isn't "Mr. Catholic" history?
by ballyb on Nov 1, 2007 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Monaghan sold the Tigers
by palehose67 on Nov 1, 2007 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Al pizza guys look the same to me
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7399026
by winningugly on Nov 1, 2007 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
* All
by winningugly on Nov 1, 2007 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rivera makes sense going there
by ChicagoPete on Nov 1, 2007 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I'm making the moves, they would go like this:
- Sign Rowand. OF becomes Fields, Rowand, Dye and Owens.
- Pickup Uribe's option and sign Mark Loretta. Loretta backsup Richar and Uribe and gets plenty of PT.
- Trade Garland or Contreras for bullpen help and a prospect. If Contreras is traded, try to extend Garland. Insert Floyd in 5th spot.
- Sign atleast one reliever from Japan.
- If Crede is healthy, try to extend him.
by White Sox Randy on Nov 1, 2007 12:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Miguel Cabrera on the trading block this winter?
With the Yankees and Red Sox both in need of a third baseman and the Dodgers, Angels, Phillies and Giants all willing to consider upgrades, the Marlins may figure this is their best chance for getting maximum value for Cabrera, who is two years away from free agency. The problem is that, with his weight up, Cabrera's defense has gone from mediocre to truly bad, and he'd make more sense as a first baseman right now. Both the Yankees and Red Sox have possibilities there as well, but they might not be willing to surrender as much talent to fill a hole that is easier plugged. Nov. 1 - 1:45 pm et
Source: ESPN Insider
by SSH2005 on Nov 1, 2007 1:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Stoney says...
Hunter
Rowand
Coco Crisp (my kids love his cereal)
and/or Japanese prospect Kosuke Fukudome
Possible shortstops (while possibly moving Uribe to 2nd if he sticks around):
Eckstein
Jack Wilson (Pirates)
As mentioned in other posts, he said that it would be no surprise if Joe Crede is dealt to the Yankees, giving Josh Fields full-time 3B responsibilities.
My question is...what would the Sox expect in return from the Yanks? Pitching, I hope.
by tailgater on Nov 1, 2007 1:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why the hell would they move Uribe to 2B
And if Crede gets traded I fully expect the Sox to get absolutely nothing in return. He has no trade value.
by hitlesswonder on Nov 1, 2007 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So let me guess -
by Brush Back on Nov 1, 2007 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like Stoney reads MLBTR........wow
by White Sox Randy on Nov 2, 2007 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Poll - None of the above
by tailgater on Nov 1, 2007 2:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















