Brian Anderson is totally thinking about going to winter ball. Totally.
"As of now, my health is good and I can't complain," Anderson said. "I just want to take this all the way to spring training."
Also in the article, The Legend is totally not sweating this free agent thing. Totally.
Speaking of Rowand, it seems he wasn't plan 1B but plan 1A (wiz):
0 recs |
152 comments
Comments
well
by Jbasic89 on Nov 27, 2007 10:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I looked back at the stats...
by SSH2005 on Nov 27, 2007 11:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Offensive comparison...
.271 AVG / .324 OBP / .469 SLG / .793 OPS / 104 OPS+
Aaron Rowand (career stats):
.286 AVG / .343 OBP / .462 SLG / .805 OPS / 106 OPS+
The main difference between the two is that Torii is graceful in CF when he makes the plays. Meanwhile, Rowand is like an old Cadillac with terrible brakes who may injury himself crashing into a fence.
by SSH2005 on Nov 27, 2007 11:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha. Good comparison.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 27, 2007 11:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Or a '73 Dodge
by Sox Machine on Nov 28, 2007 1:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"Daddy's home!"
by omnipotent grab on Nov 28, 2007 12:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
might be a dumb question
by Jbasic89 on Nov 27, 2007 11:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Go to the following two links...
http://www.baseball-reference.com/about/bat_glossary.shtml
And read the sections labeled "Adjusted OPS+".
by SSH2005 on Nov 27, 2007 11:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry you can have Rowand
Hunter
.269/.337/.452 (106)ops+
278/336/490 (112)
287/334/505 (122)
Rowand
.270/.329/.407 (93)ops+
262/321/425 (86)
309/374/515 (123)
I think I will take Hunter. 2 years older or not.
by Tdogg on Nov 28, 2007 8:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BA needs to get his act together
What would an OF of Rowand, Dye, Anderson look like?
Hmm...
Or what about Owens, Dye, Anderson.
Owens, Dye, Sweeney?
So many choices!!!
The bottom line is someone has to go if someone comes. Either Anderson, Owens, or Sweeney. Especially if Crede comes back and Fields stays in LF.
That's one crowded mediocre OF!
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 27, 2007 11:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I would give Anderson one more chance...
by SSH2005 on Nov 27, 2007 11:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
But at this point, it seems like he's just quit. I suppose that's one way to get your release, but unless Anderson's wrist really needed to rest for 5 months it seems like deciding not to put effort into being a baseball player is a bad career move.
I hate the idea of losing possible talent for nothing -- it's possible he could go to AAA and play himself into tradeability. But I wouldn't blame Williams for simply releasing Anderson at this point.
by hitlesswonder on Nov 27, 2007 11:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Guillen really
by Soulja Boy on Nov 28, 2007 8:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Then you'd put Fields at 3B
It would sure make our befuddled outfield situation a little less befuddld.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 12:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm assuming that Kenny is going to trade Crede...
CF Rowand
SS Cabrera
DH Thome
1B Konerko
RF Dye
3B Crede
LF Fields
C Pierzynski
2B Richar
As far as a timeline on a decision about Crede...
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 12:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cool, thanks!
That is one pretty darn good lineup, I'd say.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 12:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
Hmm...
- Cabrera
- Richar
- Thome
- Konerko
- Rowand
- Dye
- Crede
- Fields
- AJ
- Cabrera
- Fields
- Konerko
- Thome
- Rowand
- Crede
- Dye
- AJ
- Richar
That lineup is SO much better than what we had last year...
- Erstad
- Pods
- Thome
- Konerko
- Dye
- AJ
- Fields
- Uribe
- Richar
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 12:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude... I may be hopped up on
Bring Rowand here, please Kenny!
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 1:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Arizona Fall League wrap-up
http://rotoworld.com/content/features/column.aspx?sport=MLB&columnid=2&articleid=29553&p g=1
...........
...............
Here is what he says about the White Sox prospects...
Dewon Day - RHP White Sox - DOB: 09/29/80
2-3, 3.60 ERA, 26 H, 48/12 K/BB in 25 IP (AA Birmingham)
0-2, 6.28 ERA, 10 H, 15/20 K/BB in 14 1/3 IP (AAA Charlotte)
0-1, 11.25 ERA, 19 H, 7/9 K/BB in 12 IP (Chicago - AL)
0-1, 1.38 ERA, 9 H, 17/4 K/BB in 13 IP (AFL Phoenix)
With a low-90s sinking fastball and a plus slider, Day has the stuff to be a force out of the bullpen. However, he's now 27 and he still hasn't put it together. He struck out 63 and walked 32 in 39 1/3 IP innings in the minors last season. What makes Day especially intriguing, in addition to the strikeouts, is his strong groundball rate. Including his time in the AFL, he gave up just two homers in 64 1/3 innings last season. The White Sox could really use a guy who can get double plays in the sixth or seventh inning. Day, though, walks too many batters to be trusted with men on base right now. He'll enter camp as a long shot to make the team.
Jack Egbert - RHP White Sox - DOB: 05/12/83
12-8, 3.06 ERA, 138 H, 165/44 K/BB in 161 2/3 IP (AA Birmingham)
1-0, 3.26 ERA, 14 H, 17/11 K/BB in 19 1/3 IP (AFL Phoenix)
Egbert, a Rutgers product drafted in the 13th round in 2004, is shaping up as quite a find. Despite a middling fastball, he manages to induce grounders from right-handers, and he strikes out a lot of lefties with his top-notch changeup. That he only occasionally hits 90 on the gun means the combination might not work as well in the majors. However, he does enough things well that he should put together a career as a fourth or fifth starter, and there's a chance he'll be something more. The White Sox could give him his first opportunity during the first half of 2008. He's a reasonable bet for immediate success while the league tries to figure out his change.
Adam Russell - RHP White Sox - DOB: 04/14/83
9-11, 4.80 ERA, 159 H, 95/58 K/BB in 138 2/3 IP (AA Birmingham)
2-0, 2.81 ERA, 16 H, 16/8 K/BB in 16 IP (AFL Phoenix)
Russell wasn't all that far away from making the White Sox last spring, but he didn't fulfill the team's expectations after being assigned to Double-A. An imposing figure at 6-foot-8 and 250 pounds, Russell looks like he'd be tough to hit. However, the Southern League batted .290 against him and he struck out just 95 in 138 2/3 innings. As a full-time reliever in the AFL, he did generate more missed cuts, but he still had a 1.50 WHIP while fanning 16 batters in 16 innings. With his mid-90s fastball and occasionally impressive slider, he has real potential as a short reliever. The White Sox figure to leave him in the pen and hope that he'll be ready to help by June or July. He's due for some time in Triple-A as he continues to adjust to his new role.
Ryan Sweeney - OF White Sox - DOB: 02/20/85
.270/.348/.398, 10 HR, 47 RBI, 71/48 K/BB, 8 SB in 397 AB (AAA Charlotte)
.200/.265/.333, 1 HR, 5 RBI, 5/4 K/BB, 0 SB in 45 AB (Chicago - AL)
.286/.347/.345, 1 HR, 13 RBI, 18/9 K/BB, 5 SB in 84 AB (AFL Phoenix)
I want to give White Sox GM Ken Williams credit and assume he's not as close to giving up on Sweeney as the Chicago media suggests. Talk about a half-baked idea.
OK, moving on.
Sweeney has been mishandled by the White Sox nearly from day one. The 2003 second-round pick was sent to high-A ball as a 19-year-old in 2004 and got talked up as a candidate for the major league roster as early as 2005. All along, he's posted numbers in the minors that were average at best, but because of his youth, there were always encouraging signs to be taken from them. Only during last season did he take his first step backwards. However, he was just 22 and he hardly embarrassed himself with a .270 average in Triple-A. While his power hasn't emerged as hoped, there's still good reason to believe he'll eventually establish himself as a quality regular. He's willing to go to all fields with his left-handed stroke, and he doesn't whiff all that often. The 20-homer ability should arrive within a couple of years. The White Sox will likely send him back to Triple-A next year, but he could emerge as their top option in case of an injury to any of their starting outfielders. Odds are that he'll be some team's right fielder in 2009.
......
Former White Sox? Yep...
Aaron Cunningham - OF Diamondbacks - DOB: 04/24/86
.294/.376/.476, 8 HR, 37 RBI, 39/34 K/BB, 22 SB in 252 AB (A+ Winston Salem)
.358/.386/.553, 3 HR, 20 RBI, 23/5 K/BB, 5 SB in 123 AB (A+ Visalia)
.288/.364/.534, 5 HR, 20 RBI, 27/12 K/BB, 1 SB in 118 AB (AA Southern)
.267/.385/.360, 2 HR, 15 RBI, 20/11 K/BB, 3 SB in 86 AB (AFL Scottsdale)
Cunningham was involved in an increasingly rare prospect-for-prospect swap last year, going from the White Sox to Arizona for second baseman Danny Richar. He had a clearer path to the majors with his old club, and with players like Justin Upton, Carlos Quentin and Carlos Gonzalez ahead of him on the Diamondbacks, he might become trade bait again soon enough. Cunningham does a little bit of everything offensively, combining for a .308 average, 16 homers, 10 triples and 31 doubles in 493 at-bats last season. The speed that allowed him to steal 28 bases won't play as well in the majors, and he's not much more than an average defender in an outfield corner. Still, his professional approach at the plate has a pretty good chance of making him a regular. The Diamondbacks will let him continue to develop at Double-A at the beginning of the year. If dealt, he might make his major league debut after the All-Star break.
......................
..............................
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 3:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I hope he's right about Egbert
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 2:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've got my money on him
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 4:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He shall remain a myth and legend
While no details were offered, preliminary talks with Rowand did not even get past the number of years. In other words, the man who patrolled center field like a Rottweiler for the Sox from 2001 to '05 likely will remain a memory in the minds of Sox fans while he entertains possible offers from the Texas Rangers and Los Angeles Dodgers.
...Rowand said, rubbing his fingers together suggestively.
Apparently no home town discount coming from the Legend. Where's the love dude?
Cowley continues (who the hell is leaking all this, no subtlety at all):
Another possibility for Williams could be trying to revisit a trade for speedy Willy Taveras. The Sox were in talks with Houston last winter about Taveras, whom the Astros eventually traded to Colorado. Williams could try to use third baseman Joe Crede to get a deal done with the Rockies at the winter meetings next week.
That's good news for me, I was never a big fan of the stubby-legged Rowand while he was here. Keep your fingers crossed on Fukudome, I pray that they're working on him under the radar. I could definitely live with an OF of Dye LF, Crisp/Taveras CF, Fukudome RF.
by ChicagoPete on Nov 28, 2007 7:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
8 seconds...
by Chiburb on Nov 28, 2007 8:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
...is a lifetime in porn
;)
Can't believe folks thought we were actually going to pay for Hunter or Legend. As Dr. Phil would say. "What WERE you thinking about?"
As for The Big Picture, let it go, man. So much noise about so little. Looking at past behavior is the most accurate wayto extrapolate future events, and when's the last time we significantly (over)paid for a player? Joey B. (Management doesn't count, and neither does JD's contract, since he's "family".)
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 11:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the last time?
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 11:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, $19MM isn't $80MM
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 11:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
You can't say the Sox aren't spending money - they've just got most of it tied up in current players right now.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 11:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not spending on FA's
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NO to Rowand (says Cowley)
Crisp a more likely target for Sox; Taveras a possibility
According to a Sox source close to the situation, Rowand actually was Plan 1-A this offseason, and the Sox contacted him before they started talking numbers with Hunter to see if the sides were in the same neighborhood. They weren't even in the same area code.
What that means for general manager Ken Williams is he will continue to work the phones in hopes of landing a proven center fielder in a trade. And the name that still is being whispered around U.S. Cellular Field is Boston's Coco Crisp.
Another possibility for Williams could be trying to revisit a trade for speedy Willy Taveras. The Sox were in talks with Houston last winter about Taveras, whom the Astros eventually traded to Colorado. Williams could try to use third baseman Joe Crede to get a deal done with the Rockies at the winter meetings next week.
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/670126,CST-SPT-sox28.article
by Chiburb on Nov 28, 2007 7:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wow...
So Kenny won't offer Rowand the same 5-year, $75 million dollar contract that he offered Torii Hunter even though Rowand was his Plan 1-A? I smell bullshit.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 8:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why is it bullshit?
by Tdogg on Nov 28, 2007 8:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it's bullshit either
I'm disappointed we haven't heard Fukdome's name. At the point where you start talking about a trade like DLS and more for Crisp I think the Sox need to consider playing Owens in CF and bringing in a corner OF.
by hitlesswonder on Nov 28, 2007 9:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Cowley should look at a team's roster...
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 8:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And don't forget...
So, uh, yeah, Crede to the Rockies...jeez.
by JasonC23 on Nov 28, 2007 9:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I heard that they are going to keep Atkins at 3B..
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 10:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What's it like...
by JasonC23 on Nov 28, 2007 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what are you talkin about?
by marco054 on Nov 28, 2007 10:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 10:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Brave New World.
by Toonderstrook on Nov 28, 2007 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's like watching a train wreck...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 10:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think anyone could predict Kenny's moves..
I guess we can talk about possible moves all we want but if we end up with Jerry Owens starting in CF or LF, this offseason will be a failure anyways.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 10:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Since when doesn't Williams want to spend.....
by Tony82087 on Nov 28, 2007 11:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
That doesn't excuse the Linebrink contract, though. I'm still holding out hope that it falls through somehow.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a difference between a contract offer...
Once again, get back to me when the White Sox sign a big money top free agent. It hasn't happened since Albert Belle. Keep in mind, I'm not counting retaining players like Konerko and Buehrle.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 11:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
PLEASE
Believe it or not, the Sox had an offer on the table to pay a player 15 million dollars annually for 5 years. It's a fact, not a rumor, but a fact.
Whats humorous is you can bitch about not signing a big name free agent, and not dishing out the money, but if the Sox would have signed Hunter for what LAA gave him, you would be crying about how much money the Sox spend to get him.
by Tony82087 on Nov 28, 2007 11:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Once again, the proof is in the pudding...
I hope you direct your anger at the correct person (Kenny) when Jerry Owens is starting in our outfield.
Until then, get back to me when we sign a top free agent.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No, it's not "Nuff said"
Please respond to my post, as I am interested to hear your take. Would you have been happy to sign Hunter at the Halos price? Is that what you would have wanted, or would you have bitched that we paid too much?
Is 5/75 not a large offer to you?
Jeez, I thought I was done arguing with you when you got banned from Soxtalk. Guess not.
by Tony82087 on Nov 28, 2007 12:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would have been shocked...
If Jerry Owens is starting in our outfield on opening day in 2008, are you going to apologize to me?
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 12:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Owens is starting KW should aplologize to you
by hitlesswonder on Nov 28, 2007 12:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
except me
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
3576..
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 12:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
re
No Jesse?
:p
by The Wizard on Nov 28, 2007 1:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BTW, I apolgize for the gramatical errors,
by Tony82087 on Nov 28, 2007 12:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't you count...
Again, the problem isn't that the Sox aren't willing to spend money.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 12:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i haven't been able to figure out that distinction
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 12:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
or
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 12:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
When teams extend their own players, they have a bit more control over what part of that player's career they can use.
I actually think that Ken Williams has done a good job in terms of not allowing any one contract to become a huge albatross that prevents him from doing other things.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 12:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's what they deem "risk" in a signing
Open it up, KW!
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 12:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Because both players were already with the team...
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So, in essense...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 12:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's obviously not overpaying anymore...
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
market?
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 12:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought you were against the Dye signing.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well who the hell wouldn't
(Just to set the record straight - overpaying for Hunter/Rowand is not my idea of good business. I was willing to do it for Ichiro, though - he fits my parameters of "value" when "overpaying".)
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 12:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
there's nothing wrong with paying for quality
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 12:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not understanding
The only problem I can see is this. Kenny is still putting up this "we're going to compete in 2008!" face, and missing out on Hunter appears to be a big blow to that, as in 2008, I can't see any available option that is going to do better than Hunter. It sure ain't Rowand -- his ZiPS projection (hitting in Philly in the NL) was .276/.339/.444. The only way the Sox could replicate Hunter's probable 2008 production would be gambling on Jones or Fukodome -- guys everybody here seems to want -- and even those guys aren't great bets to match Hunter.
So what I'm saying is... If Kenny wants to tell everyone the Sox are trying to compete in 2008, he better not half-ass it -- he'd damn well better improve LF and CF too. At the same time, he'd damn well better not marginally improve the team and give up Gio or DLS in the process.
by CWSKeith on Nov 28, 2007 12:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
andruw jones
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 12:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
how do you explain his '07 though?
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 3:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not even a chance, so what's the point
by ckimcircles on Nov 28, 2007 6:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he was referring to Scott Boras
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 10:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
but then he posted again immediately after
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 10:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing gets by you, Larry
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 10:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i think jim beats me in quality
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 10:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Trumping the Angels offer...
But I could see your point if the Sox payroll was $40 million, or $60 million, or even $75 million. But it's over $100 million. How high do you want the Sox to go? Into Yankee/Red Sox territory?
Again, the problem isn't that the team isn't willing to spend money. It's that they can't spend the money, because it's tied up in the existing roster. The minors are providing little help, so if they want a backup catcher or a utility infielder or a decent reliever, they've got to go out and pay retail for that. Having a $20 million bench and a $25 million bullpen means that you can't go out and pay for that superstar.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 12:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly right.
by palehose67 on Nov 28, 2007 1:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Sox were fifth in MLB...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not saying they are cheap,
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 1:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And I don't see...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 1:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As mentioned, JD/Count were
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 2:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
uproot their families?
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 12:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not again...
Konerko was a FA at the time, the Sox had allowed his contract with the team to finish, he wasn't on a member of the team
by The Wizard on Nov 28, 2007 2:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
re
yes, Buehrle was retained
no, Konerko wasn't
Konerko was a FA at the time
by The Wizard on Nov 28, 2007 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he's a lawyer
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 2:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh
by hitlesswonder on Nov 28, 2007 9:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 11:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And before larry jumps in...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 11:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Going from
Coco is 13-22 runs above average with the glove (by UZR, PMR and fielding bible) by UZR and 5-10 runs below average with the bat. So even better than I thought, a slightly above average MLB CF.
Owens is a REPLACEMENT level player. Huge difference.
By the way I definitely wouldn't trade DLS/Gio/Poreda for Crisp. Anybody else? Sure.
by bhoov on Nov 28, 2007 12:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And I get flamed for hyperbole...
- It doesn't cost more than something than like a non GIO/DLS minor leaguer and a non-Jenks bullpen arm.
- It means that LF no longer stands for Leadoff Fielder and Owens is on the bench. And that the Sox get a left fielder with some pop (preferably signing Fukodome and moving Dye to left).
Anyway, yes Owens/Crisp/Dye is unexciting.
by hitlesswonder on Nov 28, 2007 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I got a little teary eyed reading that.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 9:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank God, we won't have to see this guy anymore..
I always hated his sh!t-eating grin.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 11:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
OK, that's funny, SSH
LOL.
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 11:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Like I said, that is funny.
This morning I was describing some of the posts from yesterday (especially bally's line) to my buddy after our run. He suggested that the SSS posters should get together for beers. SSH, you'd frighten the bejeezus out of me. Pass on THAT idea.
;)
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 12:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Man that was a classic
by bhoov on Nov 28, 2007 12:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Diaz
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 2:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agree with you there
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LF in 2008
by tailgater on Nov 28, 2007 1:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I guess...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 1:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
3577...
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 1:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
From MLB TradeRumors.com
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/11/cards-consideri.html
What about Juanderful Juan?
by ballyb on Nov 28, 2007 1:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
To highlight the total insanity
In January of '06 Crisp was essentially traded for Andy Marte (other players were involved, but for argument's sake assume 1 for 1). A very good MLB player for a real stud prospect.
Fast forward to now. Crisp's abilities have waned, but now he's worth.......voila, 3 prospects.
Pendulums in motion.
by ballyb on Nov 28, 2007 1:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
From MLB TradeRumors.com
by ballyb on Nov 28, 2007 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The...
If the Red Sox are planning onto holding onto Crisp as part of a package for Santana, it would make sense to ask a lot for Crisp otherwise. But it's just rumor, after all...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Nov 28, 2007 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fall '08?
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 2:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Rotoworld reporting...
Great.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 2:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
More information on the trade...
The Twins would also pick up Brendan Harris and Jason Pridie, the Star Tribune's La Velle E. Neal III reports. Young would likely play right field in Minnesota, with Michael Cuddyer moving to left. Nick Punto could replace Bartlett, leaving Harris to take over at second until Alexi Casilla is ready. The Rays would be opening up room in the outfield for Rocco Baldelli or Elijah Dukes. Jonny Gomes' chances of sticking around would also seem to increase.
Source: Minneapolis Star Tribune
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 2:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If true, Kenny should be on the phone...
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 2:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
notice how it says "increase"
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 2:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Carl Crawford, Rocco Baldelli, Elijah Dukes.
by SSH2005 on Nov 28, 2007 2:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you said elijah dukes and rocco baldelli
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 2:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah - I don't see the net benefit
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"Jonny Gomes' chances of sticking around
by ballyb on Nov 28, 2007 2:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure why the D-Rays
This is a challenge trade, no? The D-Rays think Garza will be more valuable than Young? Obviously, they're in the best position to judge Young, but most were not nearly so turned off on his debut season. Weird.
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
colin, you bastard,
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 2:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
those creaky joints just ain't the
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 3:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can hear them in Ann Arbor, eh?
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's got a little goatee
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 3:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Old man, I'm a little confused
Unless you refer to Jermaine Dye and Juan Uribe's ever expanding waist-line...
You were alive then, shed some light ;)
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No, the comment by JR
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
haha
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
By the way,
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What's a nute?
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 3:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lmao
nutes (neuticles) are actually a product recently invented for dogs that have been neutered so they think they still have balls. They are fake testicles. My roomates, and consequently I, have begun referring to all testicles as nutes. Just sounds funnier. Also, nuts closely resemble nutes.
What a way to pass the afternoon here on SSS.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 3:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Back to baseball:
by winningugly on Nov 28, 2007 3:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What a site.
by Toonderstrook on Nov 28, 2007 3:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Even for us "minors"?
by CWSKeith on Nov 28, 2007 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
awww, you're precious
by colintj on Nov 28, 2007 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What you need to do
by Toonderstrook on Nov 28, 2007 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
unfortunately
by larry on Nov 28, 2007 3:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
depends on how old tubesox is :)
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 28, 2007 4:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















