No more treading water, Sox crack .500
Javier Vazquez snapped the White Sox consecutive quality starts streak at 5 thanks to his propensity to be afraid of the strike zone. Vazquez clearly wasn't as sharp as he was during his first outing, but he battled through the jams he got himself into, saving his best pitches for when he needed them most. The two most damaging hits he allowed were jam-shot, opposite-field bloopers that set up the run scoring innings.
I'll take those results against a good hitting Cleveland team anytime I can get 'em, but you'd like to see Javy grow as a pitcher; learn to attack the zone more, chew up some more innings. Baby steps.
Offensively, the top of the lineup was brutal (0-13 from the top three). And Fausto Carmona throws with his right hand. Shudder.
I know it's early, but Grinderstad's AVG/OBP/SLG have slipped to the area we all feared they'd end up (.207/.294/.310). He hasn't done anything since the first two games of the season, and has looked bad doing it, failing in 3 of his 4 chances to "do the little things" like move a runner over. (I meant to have a running tally of this type of stuff so that we could try to quantify grindertude, but I knew I wouldn't keep it up. So I didn't even start. Sorry. I only know now because I've been able to keep track in my head.) We've essentially been playing with '06 Brian Anderson (minus the upside) in CF for the last week.
Juan Uribe powered the Sox to an early lead. First with a 365 foot sac-fly after Tadahito Iguchi, who Hawk called "Tejada" as he stepped into the box, struck out swinging with nobody out and the bases loaded. He then went Profundo! with 2 on in the 4th to put the Sox up for good. He now leads the Sox in AVG, OPS, HR, & RBI.
Remember when the consensus among writers this winter was that the Sox needed to upgrade at SS, LF, and CF? At least we upgraded one of them.
David Aardsma continues to be pleasant surprise in the bullpen. I wasn't expecting anything more than a back-of-the-bullpen project when he was acquired. But already he's shown the ability to wiggle out of some tough sitations. He entered in a tight spot again Friday and limited the damage nicely.
I happened to catch Neal Cotts, his counterpart in the off-season trade, on WGN this afternoon, and was surprised there as well. His control is as good or better than it ever was here, and he's reintroduced his changeup to his repertoire.
You'll remember that was the pitch that continually got him in trouble in '04. He dropped it in '05, and was suddenly very effective. Anyway he was locating it at the bottom of the zone where it couldn't hurt him, but could change the batters eye.
I also saw one loopy curveball dropped over for a strike at about 75MPH. He only threw a mid-80's pitch that I called a slurve while he was on the south side.
Prior to the '05 season, I was adamant that Cotts be sent to AAA to learn how to command his changeup. I thought that would be his key to success at the major league level. From what I saw today, admittedly based on only one outing, he's done just that. He'll be very effective this season if he can continue to duplicate the pitches he threw today in the same locations.
Bobby Jenks, on the other hand, is going to be an adventure until he finally starts throwing in the mid-to-high 90's again. I'd be more worried if he didn't go through pretty much the same thing last season, albeit with more early-season success. But I fear his velocity will be a constant concern this season.
I don't often do it, so I have to commend Ozzie for a well managed game. Well until the 9th inning anyway. He still didn't have his best outfield in the game, and it could have cost him. His handling of Vazquez and the pen, however, was spot-on perfect.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Jenks
by shaftr on Apr 13, 2007 11:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
During spring, definitely
by The Cheat on Apr 13, 2007 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely not at this point in the season
His fastball was averaging 97, getting as high as 100 and low at 95.
His breaking ball was about 90.
by 3E8 on Apr 14, 2007 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
perfect timing in '06
by asinwreck on Apr 14, 2007 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought that
by Jbasic89 on Apr 14, 2007 12:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not sure if it's been noted on here,
by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 14, 2007 12:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
PS Not to pile on,
And we WON. Maybe this is a good sign.
Perhaps all of our hitters should be charged with a crime in the offseason if they'd respond like Juanito.
by winningugly on Apr 14, 2007 9:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
by that logic
by asinwreck on Apr 14, 2007 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
anyone want to hazard a guess
obviously, sounds like it was one position player and one relief pitcher. this is the kind of crap that needs to be dealt with by a veteran player. i'm not a big fan of the "veteran presence" intangible but this is one place where an older guy in the bullpen setting an example could prove helpful.
by larry on Apr 14, 2007 11:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
just read that article
I've never heard crap like this coming from other clubhouses despite living in Minneapolis and Oakland where there has traditionally been a mix of veterans and young talent. The only thing I've ever heard on this level is the whole Pierzynski flame out in the SF clubhouse and they're a bunch of tampons anyway
Mark Gonzales also points out Ozzie's excuse for not replacing Pods in the Oakland game he screwed up - Erstad would have to move to left with BA taking over center.
I assume that this was an issue because Ozzie changed pitchers and I suppose you can't have a triple switch (please correct me if I'm wrong). But then again, can't BA play left?
Is it possible to change position players in the middle of an inning? ie switch someone from left to center or take someone out and put someone else in?
I suppose another way to have worked this out would be to bring in Bobby after 1 hitter, but I understand Ozzie's logic a little more now given the circumstances, although I don't think it is a good excuse overall for not having BA in center with Pods in left and replacing Pods with Erstad in late innings.
Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth
by rhythm on Apr 14, 2007 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that wasn't the implication i got
of course you can sub players mid inning.
by larry on Apr 14, 2007 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I may have been reading more into it
by rhythm on Apr 14, 2007 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















