Will Mark Buehrle finish his career with 99 victories?
At least the Sox didn't pick up their 10th 5+ run loss of the season. Hooray, late inning runs!
What will you remember most about the Jerry Owens Era?
Jerry Owens now has four hits since his call-up. Surprisingly, two of them were for extra-bases; one was a shot just inside the left field line with the other just inside the right field line. The two singles didn't leave the infield, and would have been routine plays if not for Owens' speed or Derek Jeter's limited range. I don't know if I've even seen him make contact on a breaking pitch yet. He wouldn't get 5 consecutive starts on any other team in baseball, yet on a team which includes Alex Cintron as a key backup plus Joe Crede and Juan Uribe as regulars he doesn't stick out as obviously over-matched. He fits right in.
That's the pitcher I wanted
Back when Mark Buehrle's name was connected with the Yankees, Tyler Clippard was the pitching prospect who I coveted (because I knew Hughes was untouchable) along with Melky Cabrera. He's not a stuff guy in that he doesn't throw hard, but he's got good secondary pitches. He's a lot like Andy Sonnanstine, who got his first start today. They're guys who don't necessarily project to be top-of-the-rotation starters, but can give you quality innings cheaply. I suppose that's the type of pitcher what the Sox hoped Lance Broadway and Kyle McCulloch would become. Unfortunately for the Sox, neither McCulloch or Broadway can match Sonnanstine or Clippard's minor league production.
I'd expect a major league team to mount a respectable offensive against a pitcher like Clippard, but it's tough to argue that the Sox put a major league lineup on the field. Mackowiak is a bench player, Cintron will be out of the majors next year, Owens looks like a 26th man, and Uribe, despite the renewed patience, is pulling off everything and still swinging at some terrible pitches. Oh, and the entirety of the rest of the lineup is hitting below their career averages.
Just DL him already!
Coming into the season, the only injury more predictable than Podsednik's groin or Erstad's ankle was Joe Crede's back. What's really troubling is that Crede's back is acting up at the very beginning of the season when it usually waits until August or September to shut him down for a week or two, and I think he's been downplaying how much it's been bothering him. He was out of the lineup again tonight, and was 1-for-his-last-18 and 3-for-his-last-26.
Completely unrelated, or not, Josh Fields has a .394 OBP in Charlotte a year after posting a .379 mark. Crede's OBP in his two years at Charlotte was .349 and .359.
All the pieces are in place
Not that I blame them -- Percival was clearly breaking down in the years before his retirement -- but with all the bullpen troubles of the Sox, you'd expect them to be represented at Troy Percival's workout.
55 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
crede trade after season
by moe berg on Jun 6, 2007 12:50 AM CDT reply actions
Oh, that trade would be great for the Sox.
- They want Joe Crede,
- They want to give us a decent CF for him,
3. They also want to give us a young pitcher for him.
Crede has marginal trade value. He's hitting a godawful .216/.258/.316, he has a recurring back injury, and it looks like he's not quite as good with his glove as the last few years.
Maybe we can get Papi for him!
by Dongfang Hong on Jun 6, 2007 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions
.332 11hr 45 rbi .390 obp
Crede trade
and are blind to injuries
Damaged goods
5.11 in the NL, yech.
But - they got us back, they stuck us with Floyd.
Drink!
Gio Gonzalez
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions
The Phillies are somewhat in
They are going to get their best years out of Utley and Howard last year, this year and probably next. It kinda makes sense for the short-term, but not at all for the long-term.
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions
i think everyone except the phillies
How durable is Gio
For him to generate enough force on that body to put up those kind of K numbers, I wouldn't count on his arm staying attached long enough to get up to the majors.
I don't see...
You might be right about health concerns, but that's true of most young pitchers.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jun 6, 2007 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Williams on Crede:
Crede was getting treatment Tuesday and was not available for comment. But Williams acknowledged that he and Crede have spoken again about his situation and the surgery option.
''That's all I'm going to say,'' Williams said. ''Stay tuned.''
Crede, 29, is not eligible for free agency until after the 2008 season. He signed a one-year, $4.94 million contract in January after having his best offensive season in 2006 (.283, 30 home runs, 94 RBI).
Fields, 24, was the Sox' first-round draft pick in 2004. He's hitting .283 with 10 homers and 37 RBI at Class AAA Charlotte, and he homered in his first major-league at-bat last September, when he was called up for 11 games.
''Whenever he comes up, he'll make an impact,'' Williams said. ''He's going to be a special player.''
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/415454,CST-SPT-ssep06.article
Who will be the Sox future outfield?
Granted it takes time to develop these guys, and the Sox seem to have very limited success with players from their system - but it makes for a bleak outlook going forward in regards to this team and what it can produce internally. I guess Fields will be a telling point of what is going on in the minors and how seriously we can take what they say about their prospects.
Stop worring about the OF
I'll tell you what, Feisty
Hawk can go sit on a land mind for all I care
Erstad >>>> Owens
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Hawk called in all his chits with his God.
THERE'S a baseball player.
Everyone keeps saying it takes time...
Bah!
Sweeney and Cunningham are the only players who hasn't spent considerable time at AAA/Bigs, and I think they are our only real prospects.
I'm really thinking Anderson is going to be a flop. I mean someone with his size and experience should be KILLING the ball. He is becoming an underachiever. Owens: Pffft. <fart> Terrero: He's 27. He's no longer a prospect. He's shown he can play at AAA (He played well in Balt's system) but he has never shown he can play in the Bigs. He looks like a perpetual AAAA or fourth outfielder.
So really we have only Sweeney and Cunningham in our system.
Sweeney needs to spend the rest of this year in AAA, Cunningham needs to be in AAA by the end of the year (IMO), and needs to spend most of next year in AAA before making an appearance in late 2008 at the Bigs (if all goes well).
For 2008 the only player I can say with any certainty that I'd expect/like to see out there is Sweeney.
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions
In addition to this...
At LEAST give us some sort of hope for the future. None of this college conference player of the year crap. 3 years in Minor ball >>>>> 3 years in College... Plus when all is said and done, you have a ready to go player at the age of 21, instead of a player ready to go at 24-25, because let's face it, college kids still gotta go through the minors.
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Some younger prospects would be good -
I agree 100%
Wooden bat leagues prepare hitters for the majors better than college will. Aluminum bats absolutely SCORCH the ball. Plus, the instruction at the college level does not equate to the instruction at the minor league level. Finally, the years that players waste in college hurt their overall development, as they will be behind the curve in their best years.
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Absolutely
There's a definite upside...
College is another, higher level of competition, and it works to separate out some more chaff from the wheat. There's a much higher possibility that the guy who dominates in college will be a productive major-leaguer than that the guy who dominates in high school will be.
If you're 100% confident that the guy you're drafting is going to be something special, then yeah, it's better to get him younger. Gio Gonzalez is probably a good example of a smart high school pickup. But if you're not really excited about anyone that's available, it's better to take someone out of college.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jun 6, 2007 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Adam Mills
Love that quote, wish someone wouldve said that to Kenny last off-season.
Sox should give this kid a go in the 2nd or 3rd.
by Gus on Jun 6, 2007 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions
18 year old OFs
The Sox might be able to get a college OF like Corey Brown from Oklahoma State or Julio Borbon from Tennessee.
Personally I want them to take Michael Main, even though hes not as highly touted as he was a junior.
by Gus on Jun 6, 2007 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions
studies have shown
by the way
Exactly.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jun 6, 2007 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Gio's attitude problem
His dad sounds like a really good guy though. And he hasn't had even the slightest bit of issues as a pro. The only make-up issue he has is that he's got a little Zambrano in him. He gets a little too excited/worked up at times.
and it's good the sox saw through that
Kind of sounds like
55%
by Gus on Jun 6, 2007 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
You mean...
Or 55% more college players contribute than high school players?
I still stand by my theory. Sure, college players are safer bets, but they are older and they still have to go through the minors.
Pitching is an exception to this rule. College pitchers can step right up. Hitters, on the other hand, have more trouble. Why? Because of the aluminum bats. All their stats are inflated, and what used to be a linedrive to the wall is now a can of corn.
That's why I'd rather take my chances on a high schooler, put him through 2-3 years of the minors, and have him MLB ready at 20-22 than draft a college player that's 21-22, send him through the minors for 2-3 years, and eventually get him at 23-25.
Just makes more sense to me.
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions
What about...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jun 6, 2007 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions
Though he can play Corner Outfield
If Crede goes, as it is likely to happen, who will play 3B? Fields.
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Ah.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jun 6, 2007 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions
i'm sorry
1B Carlos Pena down in TB is finally putting it together at age 29(.321/.390/.649 12HR) all though lefties are still murder on him.
SS Brendan Harris age 26 is seemingly put it together too (.301/.352/.416 4HR) after both the cubs and nats had given up on him.
SP Rich hill has just recently started tasting success at age 26 for the northsiders.
RP Scott Proctor didn't put it together till he was 29 last season with the yankees.
Our own Matt Thornton finally put it together at age 29 last year.
to write BA off after just 416 sporadic ML ABs is just foolish, I think he needs a change of scenery and i still think he has the potential to hit 30 HRs.
Owens this year at AAA is doing something he has never done in his career, and that is draw the walk, he could very well go down the career path of Scott Podsednik and have a few above average years at the ML level.
And finally you forgot about Chris Carter.
maybe
It's a bit early...
I'd also be leery of saying that Carlos Pena is for real.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jun 6, 2007 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions
But when bloggers are writing guys off at 24
24 may be an arbitrary age, but I would guess that for 99 percent of the guys in the minors, coaches and GMs figure if they haven't cracked the bigs after six years of "seasoning" at the minor league level, the odds of them doing so becomes less and less. It's the law of diminishing returns - every day a team runs some guy out on the field and he doesn't perform is one less day the team has to find someone who can do it right.
While those are fine examples you cite, they're more exceptions to the rule. Teams like the Cubs and Rays have the luxury of giving guys time to develop because, well, they're expected to suck. No-one will mind if Rich Hill is a AAA pitcher at best, because the Cubs themselves are closer to a AAA team than they are a MLB team.
My rebuttal:
The Brendan Harris situation was just dumb. He had only 100 MLB Plate Appearances before this year. That's not a fair shake. He also had torn it up in the minors inbetween all of those MLB stints. Not keeping him around was just dumb. He had already had success in the minors, and had hardly had a chance to perform at the major league level. Mind you, when he did, he played fairly decent.
Rich Hill absolutely DOMINATED AAA! Hill has dominate everywhere he's been except for his short, really really short stint in Chicago in 2005 where he threw 23 innings. Hill has shown prior success, and also posted a 4.17 ERA with almost a K/IP last year for the Cubs in his ROOKIE season. He performed prior to this year.
Scott Proctor: I'll give you that, but it was only one good season. Let's see how the rest of this year goes. It could have been a fluke.
Matt Thornton: MAybe you can chalk this one up to Cooper's instruction, but he succeeded in his first go-round with the Sox. But who's to say it's going to last, we've only seen one year and two months of this kid? He's ALWAYS had great stuff, and struck out lots of batters (over 1K per inning) so it's not fair to say he's sucked ass his whole career.
So of those guys you listed, only two never tasted much success before last year, and they are back of the bullpen guys. Pitchers often can get lucky and have some good years mixed in with bad.
So I think it's fair to say that if you haven't put together some decency of success at the major league by 26 or minor league level by 24, you're not likely to, ever.
by Shoeless In SC on Jun 6, 2007 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions
It's a bit early..
I like Andy Sonnanstine and picked him up in my fantasy league, but he got hit hard yesterday. You should be blasting him just like you are Owens, but for some reason you don't. Bottom line is, it's too early to tell anything on either one of them.
I agree it's time to put Crede on the DL and give Fields a try. As for Percival, ARE YOU KIDDING?? If Percival is the answer we're already FUBAR.
by Ozzieball on Jun 6, 2007 10:21 AM CDT reply actions
Love ya Joe
Love ya Kenny, but YOU KNEW Erstud was injury prone, yet you made him our LEADOFF MAN and STARTING CENTER FIELDER. Oh, wait, he was in the leadoff spot because Pods, the other injury-prone guy you decided to keep has been injured.
Now we'll be treated to a mix of sub-par rookies and bench players in starting roles for the rest of the season, as Pods, Erstud, Joe and probably Thome hop on and off the DL.
I won't even begin to try and comment on your "vision" for the bullpen...what a train wreck.
Not good, buddy...not good.
On a brighter note, although he's not hitting very well, how great is it to watch Owens friggin' fly around the bases? He got an infield hit last night...an infield hit! How f-ing refreshing.
And...they had "almost rallies" in the 8th and 9th innings. Of course they fizzled...but there's hope!
If anyone cares, I'll be there tonight, starting with cocktails in Lot G at about 5:30.
Herb Washington v2.0
"The jury is split on Jerry Owens, but it's good that he's getting a look until Podsednik and Erstad return. He almost beat out a bad bunt for a single and can run. But I want to see him perform this way over an extended period."
Apparently, over an extended period of time, he would like him to continue almost getting on base because he runs fast. If he wants to see people running around the bases without getting a hit or a walk, he should just go to Sunday games at the Cell and stick around to watch the kids.
by Sacki on Jun 6, 2007 11:09 AM CDT reply actions
Gonzalez...not my favorite
by hitlesswonder on Jun 6, 2007 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions

by 






















