Nick Swisher against some division pitchers
Verlander: 4-15 2HRS
Bonderman: 1-6 HR
Robertson: 2-19
Rogers: 4-15
Sabathia: 5-13
Carmona: 3-7
Byrd: 7-21
Westbrook: 1-19 HR
Santana: 3-14
Meche: 3-14
O Perez: 1-5
Bannister: 2-6 HR
Probably forgot some guys, just looked at some of the bigger names for SP.
Totals: 36-154
.234 BA
SouthSideSox is a community driven site. As such, users are able to express their thoughts and opinions in a FanPost, such as this one, which represents the views of this particular fan, but not necessarily the entire community or SouthSideSox editors.
0 recs |
31 comments
Comments
why not include walks?
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 8, 2008 1:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Here's his OPS against, with # of PAs
Roberston, DET .269, 23 PA
Meche, KC .741, 22 PA
Byrd, CLE .714, 21 PA
Rogers, DET .742, 21 PA
Verlander, DET .963, 19 PA
Westbrook, CLE .264, 19 PA
Santana, MIN .466, 19 PA
Sabathia, CLE .962, 16 PA
Bonderman, DET .920, 11 PA
Carmona, CLE 1.270, 9 PA
Bonser, MIN .472, 9 PA
Bannister, KC 1.262, 7 PA
Perez, KC .629, 7 PA
de la Rosa, KC .750, 5 PA
Baker, MIN .700, 5 PA
Liriano, MIN 1.250, 4 PA
by Ryno on Jan 8, 2008 5:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hmm...
Just thinking.
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 8, 2008 11:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that's it
by hitlesswonder on Jan 8, 2008 1:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
unless
by The Deacon on Jan 8, 2008 1:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
for a guy with a lifetime BA of .251
by larry on Jan 8, 2008 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Unscientifically
G PA AB H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO HBP SH SF ROE GDP BA OBP SLG OPS
+----+-----+-----+----+---+---+---+----+----+---+----+---+---+---+---+---+-----+-----+-----+-----+
29 123 107 31 12 0 3 16 13 2 20 3 0 0 0 2 .290 .382 .486 .868
25 112 89 21 4 0 6 18 22 2 17 0 0 1 1 1 .236 .384 .483 .867
22 93 76 16 2 0 3 8 15 1 25 1 0 1 1 1 .211 .344 .355 .699
26 103 84 21 7 0 4 13 15 0 16 2 1 1 0 2 .250 .373 .476 .849
+----+-----+-----+----+---+---+---+----+----+---+----+---+---+---+---+---+-----+-----+-----+-----+
102 431 348 89 25 0 16 55 65 5 78 6 1 3 2 6 .256 .379 .465 .844
by The Cheat on Jan 9, 2008 12:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
so pretty much his career average
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 9:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure there is -
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 11:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Que?
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 1:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
PS
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 1:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
why would one have waited until december
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 1:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
October, then
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 1:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
why would one have waited until october
i'm being a bit facetious, of course, but the trouble was already rearing its head earlier this year - i never quite figured out why no one (well, there were some, of course, like goldman) was drawing the connections between subprime and mortgages and banks etc. long before the "crisis" hit. irrational exuberance, perhaps?
at any rate, i'm not a big-time trader. i've shorted oil (the commodity) but i'm still relatively long overall in energy. moved some money into russia of late. nothing really all that interesting to report considering i've just taken money off the table because i think a recession is coming - but i'm not sure whether it will necessarily make the stock market do much other than tread water, in general.
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 2:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not exuberance - inertia
I've been long gold/oil for 2-3 years in most portfolios and am looking to take profits, but the damn stock market keeps falling and commodities keep going up. I think hard assets are the place to be for the next 3-5 years vs. paper assets.
Get ready in 6-12 months to start accumulating real estate (REIT's, etc.).
Agree w/ direction of the market, recession or no. Sloppy.
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 2:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i'd put it
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 2:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So we'll agree on the "12" part
If CRC goes out, that'll help.
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we can agree
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, if I'm a soverign fund
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 3:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
anyone who has cash is digging this
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Guys who can get Sox box seats
;)
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 3:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm sure some distressed investors
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 3:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
12-18 months too early, at least
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 3:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i'd apply the same analysis to the sox
by larry on Jan 9, 2008 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
didn't take long for that prediction
by larry on Jan 10, 2008 9:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's played.
by winningugly on Jan 11, 2008 8:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well
by larry on Jan 12, 2008 10:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
by hitlesswonder on Jan 9, 2008 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
*tough*, not touch, GD
by winningugly on Jan 9, 2008 2:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















