The Goose is in!
The Goose is the newest (and only) member of Baseball's HOF:
2008 Results
Player Total Votes Percentage Rich Gossage 466 85.8% Jim Rice 392 72.2% Andre Dawson 358 65.9% Bert Blyleven 336 61.9% Lee Smith 235 43.3% Jack Morris 233 42.9% Tommy John 158 29.1% Tim Raines 132 24.3% Mark McGwire 128 23.6% Alan Trammell 99 18.2% Dave Concepcion 88 16.2% Don Mattingly 86 15.8% Dave Parker 82 15.1% Dale Murphy 75 13.8% Harold Baines 28 5.2% Rod Beck 2 0.4% Travis Fryman 2 0.4% Robb Nen 2 0.4% Shawon Dunston 1 0.2% Chuck Finley 1 0.2% David Justice 1 0.2% Chuck Knoblauch 1 0.2% Todd Stottlemyre 1 0.2% Jose Rijo 0 0% Brady Anderson 0 0%
- Jim looks on Ryan Sweeney.
- BP on the Swisher trade. Thanks larry. Speaking of the Swisher trade, here's Mike Pindelski too.
- Tango looks on the HOF vote ballots.
- Hot Stove: Flubs/Tribe interested in Brian Roberts? Mariners/Reds/Tribe interested in Erik Bedard? BTW, the Tribe made an offer to Captain Cheeseburger.
- I'll link this again because it was awesome: FJM on Phil Rogers' team improvement evaluation system.
- Baseball-reference's PI has a free preview until Friday (1/11).
87 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
PI
seems what I wanted isn't available
[b-r]:
I Year G GS PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO HBP SH SF ROE GDP
SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS BAbip tOPS+ Year
+-+-------+---------+----+-----+-----+----+----+---+---+---+----+----+---+----+---+---+---+---+---+
-
---+---+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----+
1997 4 1 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 .000 .167 .000 .167 .000 -33 1997
1998 42 33 150 138 14 28 1 0 5 18 10 0 26 1 0 1 2 6
0 1 .203 .260 .319 .579 .213 90 1998
1999 69 61 279 254 34 67 12 3 8 40 22 0 26 1 0 2 3 6
0 0 .264 .323 .429 .752 .266 76 1999
The complete list is visible to B-R PI subscribers. Subscribe, for as little as $29/year.
Subscriber? Please login.
....
go here.
by Toonderstrook on Jan 8, 2008 7:13 PM CST up reply actions
I got it, I had to click to each year individually
I Split G GS PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO HBP SH SF ROE GDP SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS BAbip sOPS+ tOPS+ Split +-+------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+--+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+-----+- - ---+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------------+ 2000 71 65 294 266 38 81 17 1 11 49 21 0 41 6 0 1 2 13 0 0 .305 .367 .500 .867 .326 125 105 Away 2001 79 78 327 293 46 78 18 0 13 43 25 2 48 6 0 3 3 10 0 0 .266 .333 .461 .794 .277 112 86 Away 2002 77 74 321 289 37 92 15 0 14 50 24 1 37 4 0 4 2 8 0 0 .318 .374 .516 .890 .322 141 108 Away 2003 67 55 248 224 22 50 9 0 9 36 18 1 26 3 0 3 5 14 0 0 .223 .286 .384 .670 .214 80 90 Away 2004 77 75 312 285 33 68 12 0 12 47 25 1 61 1 0 1 2 14 1 0 .239 .301 .407 .708 .263 88 60 Away 2005 81 79 350 301 43 83 14 0 17 48 45 8 61 2 0 2 1 2 0 0 .276 .371 .492 .863 .293 134 91 Away 2006 72 71 308 263 45 84 13 0 14 51 35 1 53 5 0 5 1 9 1 0 .319 .403 .529 .932 .348 148 102 Away 2007 76 75 327 285 33 74 20 0 14 47 35 5 52 3 0 4 2 12 0 1 .260 .343 .477 .820 .269 119 95 Away
Is the drooling mandatory?
Let's say right up front that it's impossible to know if Erstad has anything left in the tank. He's 33 years old and hasn't played much the last two seasons. He hit .221 in 2006, .248 in 2007. His last really productive season was 2005. But in the reconstruction of the Astros, Erstad is exactly the kind of player Wade needs. He'll set an example in every way.
That's also true of Geoff Blum, Woody Williams, Ty Wigginton, Roy Oswalt and Doug Brocail. I don't know enough about some of the newcomers to know where they fit in or not.
Erstad fits in as a fourth outfielder and as insurance in center in case Michael Bourn isn't productive. He can also play first. He's no longer the kind of guy a lineup can be constructed around, but inside the clubhouse, his influence will be important. He's also a career .284 hitter, and given his age, it's possible he can still be productive.
"as insurance in center in case Michael Bourn isn't productive" should be "as insurance in center in case Michael Bourn is productive."
According to that link, they also invited...
white sox minor league pitchers traded by KW
2000
Mark Roberts
Brian Schmack
Aaron Myette
2001
Gary Majewski
Mike Williams
Orlando Rodriguez
Andre Simpson
Matt Dewitt
Derek Hasselhoff
Daniel Mozingo
Josh Fogg
2002
Matt Guerrier
Joe Valentine
2003
Eddi Candelario
Jason Aspito
Delvis Lantigua
Edwin Almonte
Royce Ring
Frankie Francisco
Josh Rupe
Tim Bittner
Scott Dunn
Jake Meyer
2005
Ryan Meaux
Daniel Haigwood
Gio Gonzalez
2006
Jeff Bajenaru
Javier Lopez
B.J. LaMura
Daniel Cortes
Tyler Lumsden
2007
Dwayne Pollock
2008
Gio Gonzalez
Fautino De Los Santos
http://whitesoxpride.mlblogs.com/inside_the_white_sox/2008/01/playing_with_nu.html
And his conclusion (as if you
"I guess my point is this. I don't think many White Sox fans have lost sleep over trading the pitchers on this list."
Eff this - Gerry Staley died! Gerry Staley! Chiburb/asinwreck/ballyb weep! (You old bastards/pensioners.)
;)
That's right
by hitlesswonder on Jan 8, 2008 10:20 PM CST up reply actions
its bullshit that the White Sox PR dept
That is bush league to say, "here's the shit we foisted on our trading partners." Aren't trades supposed to work out for both teams (at least that's what PR depts are supposed to say)?
Its bad karma too...
Can you get that in Chicago somewhere?
Bell's
by hitlesswonder on Jan 8, 2008 11:29 PM CST up reply actions
I think that might be the most
I saw this the other day
Of the players KW has traded (young players, i.e add Wells, McCarthy), the ones with the highest ceiling have exited most recently. Off the top of my head, ranking them by ceiling at the time of trade, I (extremely subjectively) go something like this...
Young
DLS
Gio
Carter
Wells
McCarthy
Reed
Webster (tons of tools, didn't come together. Still has his fans)
Sweeney (I had sweeney higher, but that was the sweeney of a year+ ago.)
Cortes (He could be higher, as he's toolsy still lots of potential)
Francisco
Cunningham
Rausch (his ceiling was significantly lower after the injury)
Lumsden
Morse
Majewski
Fogg
Haigwood
Guerrier
Ring
Myette
Rupe
I'm probably missing some, but you get the idea.... The previously traded pieces are firecrackers or m-80's compared to the sticks of dynamite he's begun to throw around in the last 26 months. There's one or two that are bound to blow up in his face, and when it's bigger ammunition you're increasingly more likely to lose the nickname "lucky" and pickup the nickname "stumpy"
True...
I was willing to bet that few of those pitchers were in our top 3. I know your claim is subjective, Cheat, so anyone have any real numbers on the highest rated prospects KW has dealt?
It'd be interesting to see. DLS, Gio, and Young certainly appear to be the best he's ever traded.
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 8, 2008 11:33 PM CST up reply actions
I weighted by ceiling
ah i see
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 9, 2008 12:06 AM CST up reply actions
very good
waaaaaaaaaait....
brian roberts a cub?
seems like a decent package for the orioles of gallagher, marshall and cedeno.
Is there any chance?
by Soulja Boy on Jan 9, 2008 8:27 AM CST up reply actions
nope
I like the trade...
for
A poster at Northsidebaseball.com said it best...
"You can make this trade look really bad for the Cubs.
Two of the Cubs biggest problems were offense at SS and starting pitching depth, particularly at the backend. So we solved this by trading our most MLB ready SS prospect and two starting pitchers for an admitted steroid user at a position that we were very set at."
oh well
In other news, SF paper suggests the giants going after crede.... new but old news.
I think the flubs gave up squat for Roberts.....
Where's all the media stories about how the Sox drafted Goose in the 9th round gave him his nickname and developed him into a closer and the stories of 5 years on the Sox ? Wrong side of town I guess so no parade.
by White Sox Randy on Jan 9, 2008 8:57 AM CST reply actions
I would much rather hope that the...
i just have
Aren't the Cubs still in need of a SS?
nope
as i've said before
I realize that the name
and sweet lou loves him
you're in a scrappy mood this morning
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 9, 2008 10:24 AM CST up reply actions
not unlike darin erstad!
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 9, 2008 10:29 AM CST up reply actions
yep
Rudy?
I don't see how
Cedeno has never hit well at the Major League level. He is younger and was a highly regarded prospect by some, but if contending is what you want the Cubs to do, then Theriot is the more valuable player for the present.
Cedeno may not be any better than Theriot...
Much better than Ronny Cedeno....
Assuming it's true.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jan 9, 2008 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
i'm not suggesting you hand the job to cedeno
that would
what i would go with is irrelevant
but, since you asked, i would go roberts and fukudome 1 & 2.
lmao
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 9, 2008 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
so what
theriot is garbage
Theriot is at least better than Izturis. God he was awful.
The Cubs are overloaded at 2B. They need someone who can play SS. DeRosa supposedly -can- or -used- to. I dunno if he can anymore.
DeRosa/Roberts would be nice.
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 9, 2008 12:41 PM CST up reply actions
true.
My buddy, a Cubs fan, has voiced to me that he would like Uribe. He is a very knowledgeable guy, a real stathead, and still seems to not mind his offensive tendencies. He likes his glove.
Uribe could probably do no worse than Theriot or Cedeno. Or could he?
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 9, 2008 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
so would i
uribe can backup all IF positions right?
when you're talking about
I'd like to send Uribe over to the Cubs for a reliever.
by Shoeless In SC on Jan 9, 2008 1:19 PM CST up reply actions
don't be drawn in by the siren of OPS
sure
at any rate, i thought SC was referring to who would i start at SS. theriot, hands down.
uribe vs. theriot fielding stats
Cub Rotation
Zambrano - now has contract will get as big as Colon and CC Sabbathia
Lilly - he will come back to earth
Hill - good upside
Marquis - cut from my 16 inch softball team
Dempster - Mr. Unclutch
The 4 and 5 starters are brutal, at best.
They will get out of the weak NL Central but will lose out to the Phils, Mets, DBacks or Rockies.
by BobbySouthSide on Jan 9, 2008 11:11 AM CST up reply actions
Kinda looks like ours
Yep
After Fukudome and now Roberts...what are they at?
Roberts is due $6.3m this year and $8m in 2009.
by BobbySouthSide on Jan 9, 2008 11:49 AM CST up reply actions
ugh
http://www.rivalfish.com/rivalroom/2008/01/top-five-trashiest-fanbases.html
Wasn't...
by BobbySouthSide on Jan 9, 2008 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
Boras on Ankiel who's headed for arbitration
I'ts amazing...
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Jan 9, 2008 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
Its not so amazing
Ruth's hot dogs = Ankiel's HGH
by Toonderstrook on Jan 9, 2008 3:32 PM CST up reply actions
Both lefties, sure,
Gotta add what God didn't put in, right? DNA has 3 letters. So does HGH.
Close enough. $8MM/year is the starting price.

by 
















