THT: Breaking Down the Draft: Jordan Danks
When you look at Danks as a whole: the length, the projection, the speed, the defense, the plate discipline, the power potential, and the propensity to strike out--one player that comes to mind is Rockies center fielder Dexter Fowler. The difference is that Fowler has officially broken out and has turned potential power into actual power production. Fowler's overall swing looks better and he's a better runner, but much of the same tools possessed by Fowler are also possessed by Danks. However, even if Fowler didn't develop any power, he would still make for a pretty good ball player because of the others things he brings to the table, specifically his defense and patience at the plate. So while the hope is that Danks will at some point develop power, he doesn't necessarily need it to be good ball player at the professional level.
over 3 years ago
The Cheat
39 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
What does "projectable" mean exactly?
"God created [Republicans] because He was disappointed in the monkey." -- Mark Twain.
it's sort of an amorphous judgment call
but it basically means that a scout, for whatever reason, sees the potential for x skill. in this case, scouts see the potential for danks to develop power and thus project him to do so. for power, it’s usually size or a type of swing or other attributes that lead to this projection.
"winning tacos for America was pretty cool too."
2008 Free Agent Landmines, by Dave Cameron
Orlando Cabrera, SS, White Sox
Cabrera’s one of those interesting guys that is simultaneously overrated and underrated – he’s not as good as his reputation with casual fans and teams who value batting average and clutch reputations, but he’s better than what the statistical community has generally noticed, combining just slightly below average offense with a solid glove at shortstop and staying remarkably healthy.
However, Cabrera turns 34 in a few weeks, and his power has been eroding for three years running. His ISO of .096 in 2007 was the lowest of his career until 2008 came along, where he posted a .089 – these are the only two seasons in his career where he’s posted an ISO under .100. During his heyday with the Expos/Red Sox/Angels, O-Cab had above average power for a middle infielder, and his combination of high average and gap power allowed him to be a fairly productive hitter, even with the low on base rates. Now, with the power eroding, he’s turning into a singles-only hitter, and that makes him a pretty volatile offensive player.
For a contender who needed a one or two year stopgap at shortstop, Cabrera could be a decent fit, but his reputation as a winner and clutch performer, plus the fact that he has the skills that are most often overvalued, will lead to him looking for a 3-4 year deal that will be an absolute killer by the end.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2008-free-agent-landmines/
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
That was actually posted in the Beckham thread...
How ya doin’ Wiz?
"God created [Republicans] because He was disappointed in the monkey." -- Mark Twain.
oops, didn't see it!
doing well chi, how about you?
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
ok, though I'm getting 'election fatigue'.
Wish it was over already.
"God created [Republicans] because He was disappointed in the monkey." -- Mark Twain.
twins won it?
:p
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by the way,
since i will not be visiting the maelstrom over at your fanpost (sorry for apparently destroying it), was i interpreting you correctly that you consider yourself a “white sox fan” and not a “baseball fan” these days? not sure if you consider it a good/bad thing either way but i certainly have experienced the same thing. too many things i can’t follow anymore with the same, let’s say, voraciousness as i did in the past. baseball and a couple other things are about it these days. and they seem to dwindle by the month.
"winning tacos for America was pretty cool too."
well, i'd say I'm still a baseball fan. not by your def, but...
if I didn’t love the game the White Sox would mean nothing to me. for example, I am NOT a football fan, therefore I can watch the Bears and be happy if they win and not care if they lose. Or substitute the Bulls, Hawks, and their respective sports…
so yes, I’m a fan whether you agree or not. Then there’s this aspect too (from Ken Levine’s blog):
Why bother investing two hours in a story you know you’ll fall asleep through before the climax? (I call this the "English Patient Syndrome") For the sake of being on in "prime time" networks kill the product.
"God created [Republicans] because He was disappointed in the monkey." -- Mark Twain.
i don't really care to debate the definition. seems pretty trivial.
i thought you were saying that but misinterpreted. thanks for the clarification.
on your prime time note, i do understand why baseball schedules the games at that time on weeknights. what i don’t understand is why they do it on weekends, especially sunday. note what time the super bowl is. ensuring that games end past 11pm on the east coast is beyond dumb.
"winning tacos for America was pretty cool too."
same here
the end is close thlough…
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
though I feel better after my $4700 haircut
:p
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
Emily Latella?
"God created [Republicans] because He was disappointed in the monkey." -- Mark Twain.
Good news everyone!
How good are the fans in evaluating fielding?
As per Tango, the FSR is as good a measure as anything else. This is a helpful notch in the “Alexei will be passable at SS” since he rated fairly well compared to other shortstops. He actually scouted out better than OC. I think this does help bolster the “bad positioning” argument. If his instincts and tools are good, why would he not be getting to some balls? Positioning is correctable.
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
btw, follow the link within the Tango post
and you’ll see the Sox’ expected DER per both stats and scouts was higher than actual, which I think also indicates we may have been less than optimally aligned (or just had bad luck).
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
optimally aligned?
what does that mean?
To be born an Englishman is to win first
prize in the lottery of life
you should be able to lay a rough probability of where the ball is most likely to be hit based on
the batter and pitcher. using that info, you should align your fielders appropriately. if ours were misaligned based on this info (or for that matter, we just got bad luck), we would underperform our expected DER.
are you familiar with DER?
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
yes
I have noticed that the Sox don’t seem to make as many outfield adjustments in the field as other teams. But they are all slow anyway, I think moving the players about in our case could be counter productive
To be born an Englishman is to win first
prize in the lottery of life
According to the Fans, our defenders aren't that bad.
Also, check out how definitively better the Rays are than everyone else.
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
is 0.006 a significant difference in DER?
Team statDER fanDER RealDER
CHA 0.694 0.696 0.688
http://lanaheimangelfan.blogspot.com/2008/10/evaluation-of-defensive-projections.html
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
multiply it times chances
and figure out the difference in outs. i forget what the outs to runs conversion is.
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
a chance = non HR batted ball
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
so...
[(AB – H – HR – SO – E) * xDER] – [(AB – H – HR – SO – E) * DER]
i think.
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
nope, that's wrong
it’s AB – HR – SO – E
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
what about a HR that just about clears an outfielder?
is that not also a chance? If he had taken a different route, or made the leap a split second differently.
To be born an Englishman is to win first
prize in the lottery of life
they're approximately negligible
think about how many HR are robbed every year.
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
not fucking many
when the White Sox are fielding
To be born an Englishman is to win first
prize in the lottery of life
BA would have had it
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
although it would be really interesting to see that looked into further.
you could use hit tracker to make a histogram of HR distance and apply an average park size to see how many clear by, say, 5 feet or less.
nothing gets ‘em wetter than infrequent postings on the city’s second favorite team
Oops! This link appears broken.
DNS error – cannot find server.
To be born an Englishman is to win first
prize in the lottery of life
must be my DNS server
I’ll try another
To be born an Englishman is to win first
prize in the lottery of life
Sharper at Third
The Mets hire Razor Shines to coach third base for 2009. How cool is that? “Razor sends the the runner, and he’s cut down at the plate! Not a shining moment for the third base coach!”
http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/029880.php
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
Will Carroll is right!
Will takes a tremendous beating in the blogosphere, a bit deserved, but most of it not. It is only fair to praise him with the same amount of emotion, and so, here is Will’s list of potential GM candidates from Jun 2008. You can cross #2 off your list.
1. Jed Hoyer (Assistant GM, Red Sox)
2. Jack Zduriencik (Scouting Director, Brewers)
3. Rick Hahn (Assistant GM, White Sox)
4. Mike Rizzo (Assistant GM/Scouting, Nationals)
5. Tony LaCava (Assistant GM, Blue Jays)
6. Mike Chernoff (Director of Baseball Operations, Indians)
7. John Ricco (Assistant GM, Mets)
8. John Abbamondi (Assistant GM, Cardinals)
9. Thad Levine (Assistant GM, Rangers)
10. Peter Woodfork (Assistant GM, Diamondbacks)
http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/will_carroll_is_right/
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
