Is Joe Crede painting the Sox into a corner?
With another 0-3 day in Arizona Monday, Joe Crede lowered his spring training batting average to .091. The poor play at the plate combined with his 4 errors (all throwing, I believe) have some wondering if he is as healthy as he claims.
From what I saw on the tube this weekend, Crede appears healthy, if just a little rusty. His swing mechanics look fine; the hands are high, there's no wasted motion. But it's not showing up in the results. He had a particularly terrible game against the Giants Saturday, which included an 0-3 on a number of hittable pitches and at least one 'Crede would have gotten it' moment. He couldn't have laid an egg against a more inopportune opponent.
And worst of all, we're not the only people to notice Crede's poor play. Jon Heyman quotes an unimpressed NL scout.
We posted about Williams posturing on the Crede situation yesterday. While I still think Crede gets traded, I'm beginning to see a scenario where the Sox get stuck with Crede.
For his part, Josh Fields has appeared just as unspectacular as Crede this spring, going 2-17 at the plate with 5 strikeouts and no extra-base hits.
0 recs |
145 comments
Comments
Joe does have some big time cold streaks
Given his outstanding 2005 postseason I don't think he's trying to turn the bat handle into sawdust, he just takes a while, sometimes a long while, to find a groove.
Unfortunately, now is not a good time - let's just hope he gets it before the July trading deadline (at worst).
by MarkD on Mar 10, 2008 9:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really think
It's sort of bad news for Fields, because if Crede does heat up during the season it will be much more difficult for KW to pull the trigger and trade him (assuming the Sox drop 15 games out almost immediately). And of course, if Crede doesn't heat up there won't be a market and the Sox have to keep playing him until he does heat up...
Glad I'm not the GM.
by hitlesswonder on Mar 10, 2008 9:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lets look at this offseason as it looks so far.
We resign snacks and cakes, then trade our number one trading chip Garland for OC to play SS. Then telegraph we need to move S&C, failing to do so.
We trade Carter for Quentin, not a player like carlos, but Carlos himself. You know the guy competing with Anderson for 4th OF. Oh why are they competing for the 4th OF, well thats because the bantam speedster who cant get on base was annointed by OG as our starter. The same manager who preached OBP this offseason.
Last year we burned Cunningham for Richar, who is another kid that will wind up in the minors.
So basically all the kids are getting sent down, except for the kid who can run fast. Well this makes perfect sense. Its the same team + swisher. Nice job guys. Way to give OG more toys to play with Kenny ( owens).
by southsideirish71 on Mar 10, 2008 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
by Shoeless In SC on Mar 10, 2008 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Fields is half empty as well
by southsideirish71 on Mar 10, 2008 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it could be worse.
There's still a small chance that BA gets a shot at starting CF a couple of times and actually PERFORMS. Wouldn't that be nice? A real CF? It's still possible that Quentin and Anderson pass Owens on the depth chart by the end of the season.
If you have guys like Quentin, Fields, and Ramirez playing AAA this year, maybe the Sox have some hope for the future.
by Raf on Mar 10, 2008 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
You know up until last Thur I was feeling somewhat optimistic - its quickly diminished. I see the same decisions being played over. (I really hope there actually will be some logic to this, but each day I think less and less so)
Where's Andy - we need another 3rd baseman, or is he an outfielder, no wait he played SS in the minors... or was that Mac who was the utility infielder... or was he a CF... Hey, at least 'dis kid is fast
by Brush Back on Mar 10, 2008 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see Tdogg reply to this brilliant post
by SSH2005 on Mar 10, 2008 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
right because "brilliance" is taking
by colintj on Mar 10, 2008 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Try to refute any of his points...
by SSH2005 on Mar 10, 2008 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Half the things he talked about
But if I can track down a response I made to Pete a thread or two back, I'll post it here so I can "refute" this.
by colintj on Mar 10, 2008 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You just can't see the forest for the trees then.
B.) Ozzie loves Uribe.
C.) Neither Owens nor Uribe will be starting.
A plus B does not equal C.
by SSH2005 on Mar 10, 2008 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're in dire need of metaphor help
btw, I dont know how to c/p with an iPhone and my laptops dead, so I'll just tell you that comment I made is in the Uribe Starting 2B post.
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to see Fields, Quentin and Richar start
Instead, we're now seeing rumblings that Fields, Quentin and Richar might all start the season in AAA.
by ChicagoPete on Mar 11, 2008 7:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its brilliant beause you agree with it?
The reality is many have been wrong way more often than right. Intelligent analysis involves seeing some actual things happening and then commenting. Intelligent analysis is taking real historical numbers, plugging them in- getting results and commenting on them.
Saying the same opinion based thing over and over again doesnt really mean a lot. (Example Swisher's place in the lineup. There is a math based argument with results and then there is your own Phil Rogers style math. Hmmmmm.
by Tdogg on Mar 11, 2008 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Owens getting more AB's than Swisher...
by SSH2005 on Mar 11, 2008 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats not what I said
Not to mention you still dont even know how many abs Owens will get. Unlike Swisher who has no job security issues.
by Tdogg on Mar 11, 2008 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
even if we get into the realm of predictions
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You never know with Ozzie...
by SSH2005 on Mar 11, 2008 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
toby hall back, as well
by larry on Mar 10, 2008 9:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I know it's just the backup C
I don't know -- maybe surgery last June would have essentially put him out for 2008. But if Sox want to gamble on Hall being healthy, shouldn't they have at least brought in a passable AAAA C? Last year they had Wiki Gonzalez. Say what you will, but I rather see him as option 1B than Lucy...
by hitlesswonder on Mar 10, 2008 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to Larry...
by SSH2005 on Mar 10, 2008 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right...I get that...
by hitlesswonder on Mar 10, 2008 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, it's pretty sad that we don't have one...
by SSH2005 on Mar 10, 2008 11:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ray liotta?
by The Deacon on Mar 11, 2008 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pence, Suzuki, Pedroia...
by Shoeless In SC on Mar 11, 2008 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
poreda has good outing
http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2008/03/mondays-recap-1.html
by larry on Mar 10, 2008 9:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So Larry...
Also -- when was the last time the FA Cup was so crazy? Or should I not be surprised that none of the 'Big 4' are left?
by CWSKeith on Mar 10, 2008 9:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
you should be surprised
this is a tough match to call. i think inter will win but liverpool will squeak through, possibly on just away goals. the clean sheet at anfield was critical.
by larry on Mar 10, 2008 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
at least masset won't be in the rotation ...
But there's one pitching decision that appears to be all but written in permanent marker: Nick Masset's move to the bullpen for Tuesday's contest in Surprise, Ariz., seems to indicate almost no chance for either of the two young starters being knocked from the rotation.
by The Wizard on Mar 10, 2008 9:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
cuts coming
Most of Guillen's anger was pointed at reliever Oneli Perez, who surrendered five runs on five hits and a walk in two-thirds of an inning. Perez's ERA swelled from 21.60 to 29.45 after Monday's debacle.
The timing can't be any worse, as the Sox will make their first round of cuts before Wednesday's game. The Sox will likely make 10 cuts and trim their spring training roster to 40.
by The Wizard on Mar 10, 2008 10:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why is our manager getting pissed off...
Meanwhile, Uribe can get fatter and put up a worse OPS year after year and he is Ozzie's front-runner for the 2B job. Yep, makes sense to me!
by SSH2005 on Mar 10, 2008 11:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't know
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oneli, like everyone else,
Needs a lot of work.
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wiz and SC
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 12:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSawGSqkTp8 (3:47)
by The Wizard on Mar 11, 2008 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huge mistake to keep Crede !
A big reason the Sox stunk last year was Crede's crappy season. Right now, he looks the same or worse than last year. Either he's very rusty or still unhealthy. Either way, he likely will play poorly and hurt the Sox season and then Kenny will end up dumping him for whatever it is that he can get now - maybe less.
Get it over with and dump him and get Fields squared away so that he can have a big season. This issue has the potential to really mess up the Sox this year and for what ?
It's not worth it. Dump him and move on.
by White Sox Randy on Mar 11, 2008 9:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Encouraging....
Quentin finished 2-for-5, and managed to play for ten innings in the loss to the Rockies. He should be in the regular lineup on Tuesday. "Am I there yet?" Quentin asked. "No, I'm not there as far as getting my timing down. But strength-wise, my shoulder feels even better."
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 9:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
so really
by The Deacon on Mar 11, 2008 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
his shoulder is healed
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quentin
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks guys
by The Deacon on Mar 11, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
statistically proven: 05 sox had 3rd most heart
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 9:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Now that was funny as hell
by Tdogg on Mar 11, 2008 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bruce LevineLine of ESPN 1000...
by SSH2005 on Mar 11, 2008 9:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Still Early
by BobbySouthSide on Mar 11, 2008 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mancrush.

by Shoeless In SC on Mar 11, 2008 9:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
supposed to be a reply to colintj
by Shoeless In SC on Mar 11, 2008 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did anyone happen to hear Owens on WSCR
by palehose67 on Mar 11, 2008 10:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ive heard him in the past
by Tdogg on Mar 11, 2008 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice guys finish last!
by winningugly on Mar 11, 2008 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He does sound like a nice guy...
by SSH2005 on Mar 11, 2008 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea, it's the specifics that get me
Now, not to rain on your parade, but to look at the humanitarian mission in a different (and off-topic) light. The whole going on a mission to promote baseball in other countries gives me mixed feelings. It's great that kids get a chance to be special for a day (at least) by meeting major leaguers, having someone take the time to play with them, and learn a new game, but I fear that these "missions" also have the purpose of turning these kids into lifetime consumers of the mlb "product". Shudder. The last thing a bunch of poor, underprivileged kids need is to have someone making them want to buy jerseys, baseball cards, etc. To give some perspective, there are a lot of people in Oaktown that need to have flashy things (rims, baseball jerseys, shoes), but have to steal or kill each other to get them, as evidenced by last summer's crime wave. This disturbs me. For people without sufficient disposable income, ie those in S. Africa, might it be better that they don't know what they're missing?
Sorry to get too off-topic / philosophical, if I have done so.
by rhythm on Mar 11, 2008 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're not off topic at all.
by palehose67 on Mar 11, 2008 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good line, PH
Or not. Either way, it's OK by me.
by winningugly on Mar 11, 2008 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I cannot GD type, sorry
by winningugly on Mar 11, 2008 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come to think
by palehose67 on Mar 11, 2008 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And he bunted the runner over...
Getteth them on, getteth them over, getteth them in... amen
by Hazymania on Mar 11, 2008 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
by ChicagoPete on Mar 11, 2008 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fall of the Grinder
The grinder said, "The game deceived me."
So the Oz said to the grinder, "Because you have done this,
"Cursed are you above all the outfielders
and all the infielders!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.
And I will put enmity
between you and the strike zone,
and between your fielding and hitting
To the grinder he said,
"I will greatly increase your pains in running;
with pain you will run.
Your desire will be for your extra bases,
and the throw out will rule over you."
By the sweat of your brow
you will only see bench
until you return to the ground,
since from it you were taken;
for dust you are
and to dust you will return."
by Brush Back on Mar 11, 2008 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Truly, A Seasone of Biblical Proportion
by ChicagoPete on Mar 11, 2008 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I concur
Hopefully OC, Quentin, or Swisher are nice guys as well so one of the three can bat first - ;)
by rhythm on Mar 11, 2008 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
by omnipotent grab on Mar 11, 2008 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You choose to look at it...
I think there are worse things we can do than show the third world that the U.S. is a respectable, rich, country built on democratic principles.
by Shoeless In SC on Mar 11, 2008 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a reply to Shoeless and WU
I'll leave it at that because I'm too busy today to really delve into anything too deeply. Thanks for offering your perspectives.
by rhythm on Mar 11, 2008 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
FYI - Tickets being mailed this week
by BobbySouthSide on Mar 11, 2008 10:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow - we suck
by winningugly on Mar 11, 2008 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question
Larry?
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 11:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
emails?
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
please do so
by The Deacon on Mar 11, 2008 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Stuff
From: BoKnows
Sent: Tue 3/11/2008 10:02 AM
To: Certain SunTimes Columnist
Subject: Crede vs. Fields
The following paragraph is seriously flawed.
Addressing the first part of that paragraph - Does the .091 ST average and the 4 throwing errors that Crede had yesterday confirm that?
The second part -
Fields had 12 winshares in 100 games last year. .12/game
In 2006, Crede's best statistical year, he had 20 winshares in 150 games. .13/game
It is pretty clear to me that the players are dead even (statistically) at this point in their careers. Once you take Crede's back problems, age, and other career numbers into consideration, it is clear that Fields has the potential to be a much more valuable player.
Can you please back up your statement with some analysis next time instead of just being a White Sox homer?
His response:
The rest is just gibberish. You are a moron if you are basing anything on Crede's spring numbers. C'mon, really? The guy hasn't played since June. There is an adjustment period that will take more than eight Cactus League games. And you are projecting Fields to be statistically even with Crede? Based on what? His terrible defense or his 393 major-league at-bats and .239 career batting average compared to Crede' 2,433 at-bats and .259 batting average? If the Sox were sold on Fields, they wouldn't have made such a strong push to get Miguel Cabrera.
You might be impressed with your analysis, but I'm not. Don't waste anymore of my time.
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 11:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
HAHAHAHAH
by The Deacon on Mar 11, 2008 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He called a reader
by palehose67 on Mar 11, 2008 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is he so impressed with BAVG?
Just ask certain stat gurus which they would rather have at the plate, Fields... or Crede.
I can live with Fields' glove. It's not Miguel Cabrera or Ryan Braun bad.
by Shoeless In SC on Mar 11, 2008 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus...
Fields + Prospects/Players gained from Crede trade >>>> Joe Crede
by Shoeless In SC on Mar 11, 2008 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cowley? Or Jaaaaaaaaaaay?
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chris De Luca.
cdeluca@suntimes.com
by SSH2005 on Mar 11, 2008 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And here I thought it was
by southsideirish71 on Mar 11, 2008 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's great
by shaftr on Mar 11, 2008 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The tone is hard to believe.
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Come to think of it, I'll call him Chris Lo Douche-a from now on.
Thanks for the entertainment!
by rhythm on Mar 11, 2008 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking as sports journalist...
What an jerk. But I guess it shows where the Sun-Times' priorities are.
by HulkSmash on Mar 11, 2008 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's why I wrote the editor
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
link
by The Deacon on Mar 11, 2008 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not say who it is?
Just what we need for a little site unity... a letter writing campaign!!!
by Hazymania on Mar 11, 2008 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha oops!
I still think we should flood his inbox hehe
by Hazymania on Mar 11, 2008 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I emailed the sports editor asking
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to oversimplify matters
In essence, the editor is his manager.
by Hazymania on Mar 11, 2008 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that and because I expect a much more intelligent
I did worry about whether or not this came off as tattling, but I didn't word it in terms of being offended, but rather that De Luca was symptomatic of an issue with the ST's sports editorials and why I didn't buy their products.
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why so?
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It wasn't an
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so what
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To each his own.
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would guess
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't that's the role I was occupying
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
who's fighting any battles for anyone?
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A hypothetical, Larry.
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You want to
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but why does it matter?
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I HAVE NO PROBLEM
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks, we've got that
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not irrelevant enough
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
its not like he gave me a harsh
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's telling me
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not demanding it, just suggesting it
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baseball is irrelevant, Larry.
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm finding it hard to follow
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gheezz...
I initiated the e-mail conversation by critiquing, in a not so kind tone, De Luca's argument. I wanted a response. He gave me one and was clearly put-off. He was condescending and just plain wrong in his analysis.
However, he's entitled to be a crappy sportswriter. As Bobby Brown says, "That's his prerogative."
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's an honor so often been bestowed upon me
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha....I'm not that big of a douche
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
a possibility, but a slim one
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And who cares about fighting battles...
Sure, that's a bit dramatic for this particular conversation. The point is that De Luca 1. is a moron and 2. is completely unprofessional 3. deserves whatever he gets for sending a reader in nastygram in response to his obvious lack of knowledge.
by HulkSmash on Mar 11, 2008 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I figured that Bo sharing it
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was 99.9% sure that
Do whatever you want with it. Sportswriters are allowed to write garbage and get away with it all of the time. That's why there are sites (firejaymariotti.com) that attempt to make writers accountable.
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The presumed appeal of ignorance
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't worry about it...
Probably won't even get a response.
by BobbySouthSide on Mar 11, 2008 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
De Luca
by The Deacon on Mar 11, 2008 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is wanting Miguel Cabrera on your team
by 3E8 on Mar 11, 2008 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it is if you are
by colintj on Mar 11, 2008 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Batting Average
I can't remember the guy who first threw BA into a boxscore ( err... 1890's or something ) but even he said something like 'This isn't great, but its okay for now'.
That was over 100 years ago. Please? Find a real stat.
by coffeepac on Mar 11, 2008 11:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's a sad day...
I guess his Fukudome baby-sitting job is over.
by SSH2005 on Mar 11, 2008 12:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ugh
by Winning is Fung on Mar 11, 2008 12:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Gotta be your new signature, Bo.
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 12:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha...I like it.
by BoKnows on Mar 11, 2008 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Me too.
by ballyb on Mar 11, 2008 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey! My sig line resembles that remark!
by Chiburb on Mar 11, 2008 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about a new post wiz?
by omnipotent grab on Mar 11, 2008 2:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
he still hasn't adjusted
by larry on Mar 11, 2008 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, no!
today, I logged on early!
by The Wizard on Mar 11, 2008 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But did you know
by Brush Back on Mar 11, 2008 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought you were joking
I guess the real question is did he play hockey?
by rhythm on Mar 11, 2008 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea
by Pollyhelp630 on Mar 13, 2008 8:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















