South Side Sox: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

White Sox Bandwagon Doesn't Leave USCF

Blame the bullpen. Alright. But nobody's perfect.

Blame Ozzie. Miss the mark. He he made the right move. The players failed.

Blame the offense. Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!

The White Sox have dropped their last 7 road games. 4 of those games came on walk-off HR. All told, the Sox have thrown a total of 22 pitches in walk-off situations over those 7 games. 4 have gone over the wall. 4 HR in 22 high-leverage pitches is absurd, especially when you take a look at the bullpen's stats as a whole.

Meanwhile, the offense batted just .234/.283/.320 in the first 6 of those games. (Baseball Musings updates their DB in the morning. Click the previous link and alter the endpoint to get the proper 7 game total). They've gone just 7-for-53 with one extra-base hit with Runners in Scoring Position over that span (full 7 games -- I did the math), slugging .153 in their own high-leverage situations.

In other words, the Sox 7-game road losing streak has been made possible only through the teamwork of two incredibly unclutch forces. Had either the offense or bullpen been able to perform with the hanging in the balance, the Sox might be looking at a .500 or better stretch on the road.

Instead we're forced to confront the fact that the Sox appear to have the deadly combination of an explosive offense that appears above average on paper, but one that's prone to prolonged droughts especially with runners on base, and a bullpen which appears great on paper, but in practice is prone to give up game-winning bombs. It's the perfect combination to appear like a good team, one that ends up ranked #3 in BP's hit list and #5 in THT's Dartboard Factor, thanks to their phythagorean record loaded with blowouts on one night followed by close losses the next.

Pythagorean record is a nice system for judging the true talent of a team, but it's not without flaws. And we've seen enough teams on the south side that have nice pythagorean records get outperformed by "lesser" teams.

So just as many of us felt that loss coming when the Sox were unable to plate Nick Swisher after his leadoff double, which made Ozzie pull Danks after 6, which put the bullpen in early, which, well, you get the picture, I feel like these stretch of eminently winnable games -- both the 9-game stretch against sub-.500 clubs, and the overlapping 7-game road losing streak -- are a harbinger for the Sox blowing a mediocre division ripe for the taking.

Playoff teams don't have two losses in which they allowed ZERO earned runs before the All-Star break (No team has lost more than 2 in the last 10 years). Playoff teams don't have all of their complete games go for losses (Sox are 0-3 in CG). Playoff teams don't have stretches were they get walked-off 4 times in 7 road games while slugging .151 w/RISP. The Sox aren't a playoff team. They're a .500 club in a terrible division. And that terrible division is the only reason they're in first place right now.

0 recs  |  Comment 241 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Why Dotel over Danks
By Mark Gonzales – 6:19 p.m.

White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen quickly responded to a question why he pulled John Danks after allowing one run in six innings in favor of Octavio Dotel, who gave up home runs to Derrek Lee and Aramis Ramirez in the seventh that tied the game at 3-3.

“If I thought about it, I would have kept [Danks] there,” Guillen said after Danks threw 85 pitches. “We have our game plan, and the seventh and eighth inning is for Dotel. Thank God, we got to pinch hit for [Danks], and Dotel threw well. He just got hit twice. He just threw the wrong pitch to the wrong guy."

http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2008/06/why-dotel-over.html

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jun 20, 2008 6:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I didn't think swapping Dotel for Danks was at all a bad move

I didn’t think much of it at the time. Middle of the order was coming up and outside of a couple of mishaps, Dotel has been pretty awesome this year.

Apparently there’s a lot of teeth gnashing about Ozzie’s moves today over at ST. I’m not really sure why… Seems to me the Sox got incredibly unlucky today. The combination of things that went wrong for the Sox - Quentin and Cabrera each missing homers by about a foot, the stranding of runners, the inability to get either Anderson or Swisher over to third - is an absurd amount. Then again, I think I’ve said that several times over the course of this season, so maybe it’s gotten past the point of being just bad luck and is actually something of a trend.

by CWSKeith on Jun 20, 2008 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well said

i agree with you completely. if Q or orca had gotten one of those out, we would likely be singing a different tune, but im pretty sick of saying that myself. certainly a disturbing trend to say the least.

by parkermo on Jun 20, 2008 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't blame Ozzie for anything either...

but this luck bullshit has got to go. How many leadoff men on base did the Sox fail to knock in or even advance? We have seen this garbage before.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's where I am

This is a team whose greatest skill is their ability to underachieve their phytag… This comes from a variety of skills…

Hitting that only comes in bunches…
Lack of hitting with RISP… Specifically when getting good pitching. (It’s not like we’ve seen many blowout losses)
Good starting pitching keeping every game close
Inability to productive out their way into free runs (especially in close games)
Insanely fluky number of walk-off HR per walk-off opportunities.

Just as with the D’backs last season and Angels this season, it’s important to point out why the Sox have underachieved their phythag by 4 games… The D’backs got blown out in 5th starter games and had a poor backend off the bulpen. The angels have a ridiculous “close” record thanks to a solid pitching staff, shutdown closer, batting average driven lineup, and an ability to manufacture runs. The Sox are 4 games under for the reasons mentioned above…

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Angels

30-13 in “close” games according to THT—13-17 in others.

Sox on the other hand are now 15-20 in “close” games and 26-12 in games the rest….

At first glance it looks like the Sox are the better team, just unlucky. But if you watch everygame, see how and when the teams score/prevent runs, the Angels appear both better suited to make the playoffs and make a run once they get there.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh

Honestly… we have been hosed by the umps all year long. I am not saying that every call has to go our way, but if half of the games we’ve played were called evenly we would have about 5 or 6 more wins. I think it is a combination of bad luck and terrible umping against us. I know that is a lame excuse and I am usually not one to criticize an ump because I ref football and basketball and I know what it’s like to have Little Johnny’s dad all up in your face, but I feel that we have had the short end of the stick on about %75 of close plays, pitches, and check swings. Plus the Angels have that laid back dude who just doesn’t care if he wins or loses.

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ladies and gentlemen, hawk harrelson.

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 5:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seems a tab over the top

Ya win some ya lose some. Go get them tommorow. This team has flaws, but as Joe Morgan says: there are no perfect teams.

by madvillian on Jun 20, 2008 6:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

that's dr. joe morgan

:p

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jun 20, 2008 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

as of now...

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 5:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's no overreacting

I’ve thought the Sox were a .500 club all year long… The only time I really raised those expectations was following the 7 game win-streak, but I hedged my bets by saying I’d wouldn’t be full “on the bandwagon” until I saw how they did on that 9-game stretch preceding the Cubs game… 4-6 record later…

I still think they’re a .500 club. The division just sucks.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well if we keep beating up on the division we'll be in good shape

In ‘05 we were just 6 games over outside the division (before playoffs of course).

by 3E8 on Jun 20, 2008 7:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

cause for hope

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure if you looked hard enough...

...you could find a 7 game road stretch from 2005 and cherry pick stats that made that team look really bad.

I’m not saying this team is as good as 2005, but I don’t think it is as dire as you make it out to be. The whole home/road balance has been skewed across the league, not just with the Sox. Predicting the rest of the season based on a week or two of games is ridiculous.

Both feet on the bandwagon.

by vince_ on Jun 20, 2008 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

How many teams have winning records on the road? Not many. Granted.. you could argue that the “road” status doesn’t matter as much in Chicago.. but I think thats bullshit. There are Sox fans at every away game.

The Cubs got lucky today more then anything…. I agree our offense has been having some troubles on the road but that happens.

We are going to the playoffs, we may not go far, but I don’t see anyone in our division catching us. Not saying we are going to win the whole thing.. but remember nobody picked us in 05.

In baseball… possibly more then any other sport, its about who is hot in October.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I need to clear this up

“In baseball… possibly more then any other sport, its about who is hot in October.”

Basically meaning that in baseball… when it comes to the playoffs, its more about who is playing well and hitting a hot streak at the right time.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

just looked

and… not really. the sox in 05 never had more than a 3 game losing streak on the road, and even a bunch of those were games in which the sox scored 5+. the sox road record in 05 seems to more illustrate cheat’s point that “playoff” teams are teams that go on the road and win close ones. in a quick scan, i count 30 road wins in which the losing team was within 2 runs of the sox. that seems like a lot, and im not sure if it proves them to be more “clutchy” than this team, but they certainly never had a strech like this. also, the 05 team outperformed its pythagorean by 8 games, so i dont think it really helps much to compare this team with them. but, regardless, i agree with both you and cheat in a way; this stretch of road play is bad, offensively, and needs a remedy… yet im not sure it is time to get worked up about it, with the sox being in first place, bad road performance around the league, etc. It sure would be nice if the sox had pulled out a few of those, as I would be the first to point out that champions win those types of games on the road, e.g. 2005 white sox haha

by parkermo on Jun 20, 2008 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, i didnt mean to say i agree with the notion

that playoff teams go and win on the road. just using it in the general abstract way in which its used by talking heads on tv. i of course agree that a playoff team is a team that wins, period.

by parkermo on Jun 20, 2008 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm looking at it myself now

Kinda fun to look back on it. August was def a scary month.. we lost 7 in a row. September was iffy as well.

Anyways, I’m just not ready to jump ship yet. This team has gone far beyond my expectations already. Remember what we were saying before the season started?

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, true

but, its not like i havent watched the 2005 dvd enough times already ;)

by parkermo on Jun 20, 2008 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

:)

I hear that…

I’ll never forget the first time I told my friends that I thought the sox were going to win it. We were sitting in a bar when I made the declaration. They (all cubs fans except for one Indian fan) all said “your crazy.. first round and out”.

I can’t tell you how nice it was to be right.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Guaran - fucking - teed

Ozzie wouldn’t have lifted MB or Vazquez if they were pitching like Danks.

Pitching, defense, health.

by ballyb on Jun 20, 2008 7:28 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think I agree with your comment...

but I still don’t blame Ozzie for the loss. This one is on Dotel and the pathetic “can’t advance a leadoff runner to save their life” offense.

The only way they were going to score those runners was via a longball.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i just don't understand why they couldn't get anybody over.

the guys didn’t hit homers to get on base, right? is it all approach?

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What is so hard to understand?

Hitting homeruns is great but when your offense is almost entirely dependent on it, do you just pray for a homer a la Farmer everytime the Sox hit a leadoff double? A bunt and a groundout / sac fly score that runner.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not what i'm asking.

i’m asking for the cause of the inability to get it done. obviously, the sox put balls in play, other than home runs, that do not result in outs (see leading off 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th innings today). so what is that results in being unable to hit singles or doubles after that? the conventional wisdom on here is that everybody swings for the fences. if so, do they only do that when runners are on? were the guys leading off the 6th-9th trying to hit home runs and fell into singles and doubles instead?

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 7:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

crickets

i guess no one actually wants to address the underlying reasons for what they whine about. rather typical.

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

perhaps it's a product of skill sets?

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 5:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

to some degree

as noted, they’ve hit very few line drives this year. if hitters can’t control their BABIP to a large extent, i don’t see why we should expect that to continue. we don’t hit a lot of ground balls, which is very good.

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 21, 2008 5:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i figured toonder's comment/question was more about approach than it was quantifiables.

so obviously none of us could truly answer it.

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 5:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

which is why i proposed skill sets.

maybe sox hitters try to hit homers because they wouldn’t succeed in getting runners over consistently and would sacrifice the homers trying to do so. the higher level players i’ve known have generally tried to develop a ‘launching’ swing so that if they do hit something on the nose it goes out. then, their approach at the plate is to just try and hit everything as hard as possible.

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 5:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if i recall correctly

the double by anderson and maybe the double by swisher (or it could have been someone else) hit off the wall deep in the outfield….one could argue that they were swinging for the fences then but just resulted in doubles

either way, i further rest my case that the offense lives and die with the home run and their ability to ‘manufacture runs’ via singles, moving the runner over, bunting, sacrifice etc is poor

by The Scoper on Jun 20, 2008 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

they both hit middle to high off the wall in center if i remember correctly

to be honest, it seemed that fukodome could of had a play on both of them if playing back enough. they definitely werent balls that were barely missing the basket. it was fukodome’s first start in center this year and i wonder if it had anything do with it.

regardless, both of the balls were well struck so made it harder for him to make a break back on them if he wasnt already playing the batter deep

by The Scoper on Jun 20, 2008 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i'm trying to uncover

whether they were high fly balls, which would indicate uppercut ima waveland this shit swings, or not.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i couldnt determine from my vantage point on the television

how high the fly balls were. all you saw was that it was struck and then fukodome running back, the ball hitting off the wall, and then bouncing back beyond fukodome and him retreiving the ball

by The Scoper on Jun 20, 2008 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how relevant is that? you guys are griping but not giving the context or the underlying cause.

when you lose a lot of games by a little, the tendency is to feel disappointed and cnsider the possbility of victory. if you lose by a lot, then you suck. but this team doesn’t suck. and we’re trying to figure out how good we are. I think losing a lot of close games indicates that we’re good. our flyball tendencies as a bullpen are part of the HR issues, but in the long run it isn’t as big a deal as the game makes it out to be.

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 20, 2008 9:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is what I would have said

Just because it has happened so far doesn’t give me why we should expect it will continue.

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 20, 2008 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get it

I’m a sox fan from England and I watched the game on MLB.TV, and there are fans from the White Sox all over the place, right in the middle of the Cubs fans!!! This would never happen in English football, they would be lucky to make the local hospital with out a horrible scar. How come you are so tolerant to your biggest rivals??? why do want to lick the arse of your rival? makes no sense to me

by hoodlight on Jun 20, 2008 7:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Fuck off. We're mourning ; )

Pitching, defense, health.

by ballyb on Jun 20, 2008 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

beautiful.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cuisine?

Or do you like haggis?

You POS.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

shits nasty

Everyone would order it because of the name…

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Having been to both English Soccer Games and Crosstown Classics

The atmosphere is totally different. I hate to say it but you guys simply outshine us in your fandom. Its way more intense over there. This has positives and negatives.

Of course the occasional fight breaks out, but you must understand that we are mainly all from the same area. I have way more friends that are Cubs fans then Sox fans. We give each other shit, but its all in good fun.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

I sat in the vistors section during the Macedonia v England nation game two years ago, when they tied 0 to 0. Needless to say we hauled ass out of there.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

how many oscars did that guy win again?

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's just laundry.

Never trust a big butt and a smile.
Sox Machine

by Sox Machine on Jun 20, 2008 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will expect more outrage from you guys...

if the Sox lose a Contreras vs. Marquis matchup.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 7:37 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Lilly

Looked pretty shitty today… some of our batters looked worse though

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the matchup shouldn't matter.

if the offense is terrible, what’s the difference who’s pitching for the sox, right? and marquis has outperformed lilly this season.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 7:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Regardless of season stats...

We both know who the better starter is between Lilly and Marquis. Plus, Lilly is a lefty and the Sox struggle against lefties. If they don’t beat up Marquis tomorrow, more people will be pissed.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're probably right.

i just don’t see the matchup to be any more favorable than today’s.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do...

Marquis is a righty and he throws junk. If the ball isn’t sinking for him or if they lay off the low crap, they can tank his ass. I guess we’ll see.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hopefully it'll be an '06 repeat.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you argue just to argue.

that statement is ridiculous.

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"more" outrage?

is that possible?

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes we have football

and my country is hopeless, but I just laughed tonight when i saw the fan shots, all mixed together with the Cubs and the Sox, and you are supposed to be the big rivals, would never happen in an english soccer game

by hoodlight on Jun 20, 2008 7:41 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

if i had a choice

i would sit with only my sox-fan friends, and that would be as far away from my cubs-fan friends as possible. unfortunately, i can only choose which section my seat is in, and nothing more.

by parkermo on Jun 20, 2008 7:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

And yes I’d rather only sit by sox fans.

We should point out that the stadium is segregated like they are over in the UK.

When I was over there I found that strange though… so its all perspective.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fuck

“We should point out that the stadium is segregated like they are over in the UK.”

I mean our stadiums are not segregated.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

but if they were...

boy would that be embarrassing for the rays when the red sox/yankees/cubs/basically any other team with an existent fan base came to town

by parkermo on Jun 20, 2008 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

our stadiums are segretgated

because if they didn’t the fans would beat the crap out of each other, you lot are very very calm!!!

by hoodlight on Jun 20, 2008 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

My sister got stuck in a riot in Italy… she said it was fucking scary.

But Parkermo is right… look at the poor Brewers fans when the Cubs come to town.

I would just skip those games, I’d hate to deal with asshole cubs fans the whole time.

Also hoodlight, fights do happen. We just don’t have these crazy organized “firms” and “ultra” groups like you do.

But I will say it again, you guys are more intense about it over there. The first match I saw when over there blew my mind.

I lived in London btw.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't it kind of different, though?

When I watch English football games, doesn’t the visiting team usually have a designated section of the stadium for its fans to sit in? I don’t think I’ve ever seen the type of ‘mixing’ that you typically see at any American sporting event.

Also, there’s the apples and oranges comparison of football against baseball, where one game doesn’t mean nearly as much in baseball as it means in football (not to say their seasons are short, just that they’re not as long (games wise) as baseball).

Don’t get me wrong - English fans seem to have a bit more ‘passion’ (or whatever you want to call it) than your average American fan (and that’s an interesting topic in and of itself, regarding why that is) - but I don’t think the comparison is completely apt.

by CWSKeith on Jun 20, 2008 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trust me

Being there at a game is a completely different experience then watching it on TV. In Europe they have “watch lists” which prevent certain fans from entering countries/games.

Oh yeah, we also don’t have a history of organized “sports holliganism” either. We don’t have massive groups of fans meeting up to fight before the games.

Not sure if it still applies but some of these “hooligan” groups became big criminal organizations as well

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

re: "we also don’t have a history of organized 'sports holliganism' either."

815Sox, meet the Ligues. Ligues, 815Sox

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 7:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not the same

Get a large group of Ligues’s together and you have some “firms”

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mean

We’ve never in the US had a fanbase that was entirely prohibited from attending games. Thats happened over in Europe.. with at least the English. Also these “firms” and “ultras” tend to take either extreme right or left political positions. I remeber

Look at this shit:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfF3JygsW4o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlPo6k6m6p8

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not a hooligan!!!

and thanks for getting involved on my drunken post!! but what I saw on MLB.TV on the suposed big town cross matchup, jesus it was very weak, come to England for a big football derby game and see some proper fan passion.

by hoodlight on Jun 20, 2008 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not saying you are mate

I don’t know how you got that idea.

I’ve been to big games in England, Arsenal, Manchester, Chelsea and National Matches

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

When the EPL picks up a 162 game Shedule (sic on purpose)

even the hooligans would get complacent

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good point.

if there was another football team in chicago, it would be bears-packers to the nth degree.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 8:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh my god

That would be fucking nuts

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha

yup, 162 games would blunt most blades

by hoodlight on Jun 20, 2008 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jesus

I was just pointing out that you guys have way more sports related violence over there… which you do.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A while back I read a bit about those on Wiki

I’d be interested in your take on why the passion seems to be so strong in Europe (specifically England). Is it because soccer is the only top sport they have over there (or am I wrong with that assertion, too? are the English cricket and rugby leagues equally as good as the EPL is, relatively speaking?)? In case I’m not being clear enough… personally speaking, I not only root for the White Sox, but also for the Blackhawks, Liverpool FC, the Bears, Marquette basketball and (to an extent—they’re last on this list for a reason) the Bulls. This may sound silly, but there’s only enough ‘passion’ to go round.

Another observation/question that picks at the topic a bit… it seems (as an outsider) that English fans root for the team in the city they were born in. In other words, a person from Liverpool won’t root for Man-U, a person from London won’t root for insert-non-Arsenal/Tottenham-or-any-other-London-team. Does that hold true (for the most part)?

by CWSKeith on Jun 20, 2008 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If i could answer

that, I’d be some big shot journalist I guess!! and you are right people are very passionate about the local cities football clubs (which is why I started this ‘fans sat together, rivals’ never happen ever where I live)
but I love baseball, I think it’s a fantastic game, and I love the pale hose too, but I’m afraid you lot wouldn’t last five minutes supporting an English Football team.

by hoodlight on Jun 20, 2008 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

OR maybe

No offense but maybe we have better things to do then wander around drunk before and after the games looking for rival team fans to beat up???

And I keep telling you there are fights between cubs fans and sox fans… we just don’t fucking organizer ourselves into “supporters clubs” and “firms” and “ultras” and shit like that

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also

You are only the second British person that I’ve heard say they like Baseball. Most of my friends over there hated the sport. Said it was boring. Then I’d say but what about cricket or fucking “bowls” or whatever that shit is called.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

(Inhales from his bowl, deeply)

Everything is a bowl to you, 815.

;)

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Badum Chish

Good one.

I would love a bowl as well… but I haven’t puffed in a month. Need to piss clean in case I get a drug test for whatever job I’m applying for.

Now the restaurant that I currently work in doesn’t give a shit… but I’m so sick of that place.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

so that's why you can't spring for MLB.tv

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 20, 2008 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

priorities.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

College football is a far more proper analogy. A friend/blogger had a friend with crutches get assaulted in Columbus.

tOSU and the SEC are highly comparable.

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 20, 2008 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hoodlight

go away for good.

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I appear to be in the middle of it once again

sorry everyone. I’ll be in France next weekend and as such won’t be around much so please, put up with me for seven more days.

by CWSKeith on Jun 20, 2008 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice.

France is nice for the most part. What area are you going to?

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he's not going to nice.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh snap

Good one.

Nice is very Nice though

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Strasbourg, mainly -- checking out the EU

Just got an email from the director. We’ll also be going to Heidelberg, Germany.

by CWSKeith on Jun 20, 2008 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have fun

I want to go back to Europe but its going to be awhile I think.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LARE?!

Yeah, but somebody else doesn’t… I just don’t remember who

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

'burb?

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Burb was def not liking the

Jamband/Headshop talk yesterday

or my quitting smoking talk

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

HE HAS A DAUGHTER IN SEATTLE TO THINK ABOUT

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 20, 2008 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who's got a man.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

colin is channeling himself some positive k right now...

“what’s your man got to do with me? i ain’t tryin’ to hear that, see?”

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

believe it or not, i've already used that on her.

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 5:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Soccer... yes.

American football and the NBA is a no-no.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jesus Effin' Christ, calm down

larry’s earlier post (“aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh..etc.) sure as fuck fits here. Cubs have had the best record in the majors after June 1 – 1st time in 100 fucking years, so it’s meaningful. We lost in the botom of the ninth on the road to this team. We didn’t score every time we could. We didn’t advance runners every time it would’ve been prudent. Jesus Christ, that’s baseball. We lost by a hair to the best record in tha majors on the road (where no one is fucking winning this year – greenies anyone?). Our bulpen failed to hold a lead. OK – there are 3 games in the last 2-3 weeks we’ve lost like that – Tampa on the road (where the Cubs were just swept) in the bottom of the 10th, Detroit on the road via a Miggy Cabrera walk-off (yes, he sucks a lot – almost like BA hitting it), and today.

I am a pessimistic bastard when it comes to the Sox (I took the “under”, remember?) but we are not a .500 team – we, before today, had around the 4th best record in the AL. We are still over .500 by 9 games the last time I looked. So lighten up, already. The heat gets hotter when we play the Cubs, but don’t fucking unravel when we don’t win, especially when it looked like we should’ve.

Let’s grow up here, take it like a man, and play ‘em tough tomorrow. Fer Chrissakes.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't fuck with Mickey

He’ll eat out the ass of your Honey Badger, especially if you infringe on his patent.

You POS.

;)

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good post

Kinda what some of use are getting at.

Very few teams are playing well on the road right now. Its not just the sox.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it really is quite hilarious

you know, a neutral observer would probably look at this series (and the next one) and this game and say “wow, these teams are pretty evenly matched; i’d expect it to be a close game; i’d also expect the home team to have the advantage. i think i will posit that the likely result is two wins for the home team in each series and thus an overall even 3-3 record over the six games.” but i guess neutral observers tend to be a little more rational and a little less in the moment than fans.

and, as a sox fan, i’ll say the sox are fucked.

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I bet almost everyone had the same feeling...

That it was going to be a loss once Dotel gave up the lead and it was tied. And that’s because everyone knew that the offense was going to fail, even when they got the leadoff guy on each inning. Even though it was a close game, it had a very predictable ending due to the futility of the offense.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd take that bet.

It’s exhausting to point out the obvious flaws in your assumptions.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not Monsignor Non Sequitur for no reason dang nabbit

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 20, 2008 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

okay, hawk.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I stand by my post

I don’t think I’m doing any unraveling here…

And if anything it has far more to do with the Sox last 7 road games and the lackluster 9-game stretch against sub .500 teams… This is a reaction to a trend, a series of too often repeated events, not a single game.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 8:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Small. Sample. Size.

WTF did you do in ‘05 during the dog days of summer? Did you predict the end of the world, the loss of our division? (Not rhetorical – I wasn’t on the site then.) Goddamn, we hit 2 homers, we had great starting pitching, we lost by one run to a goddamn good team on the road, and we live to fight another day.

I again point out that road victories, for any team (witness the fucking Scrubs this week) are few and far in between. Danksy settled down, looked good, and we were a hit or two away from busting it open. Knife’s edge, you know?

Get a grip, folks. You don’t have to be onthe bandwagon to see we are very competitive, exciting, and in the thick of it. So strap it on. It ain’t easy, and it’s great. These ain’t the Pirates, and we won’t score or win at will. Grow up.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's sort of funny

just about every year we hear about how “no team that ever did/didn’t do this that or the other thing has ever made the playoffs.” and then that team promptly does. while i understand the concerns of some people on here, i’m having a little trouble worrying about some of these rather random statistics that are being cited. perhaps i’m stuck with the picture things a little more and am missing some important trees. we’ll see.

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i don't think cheat was doing his best chicken little...

but surely some people on here are and do consistently. if i am missing some important trees in not believing that the sky is falling quite yet, at the very least i will have a much more enjoyable summer.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 8:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No - you had goddamn better be tethered to this site

all fucking summer long. Goddammit.

Are you in or are you out?

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

after the lunacy of today (and other losses)

i’d be out. there’s only so much bemusement i can derive from reading other people go ape shit over a baseball game. perhaps it’s back to back reading of gamethreads by me, which i deliberately avoid for this very reason, but it seems to be spilling out from those.

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Take a break, bro.

You are too valuable to go the Chicago Pete way. Go nail the wife, take a trip on the Rhine, stretch out. But in your gut you are a Sox fan, you magnificent bastard, and you need to be here. This is the most intelligent place to commiserate with your brothers and sisters.

God help us.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it certainly is the most intelligent

but that gap seems to be diminishing.

AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH IT'S OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's like the Presidential election

Gotta vote, or you can’t bitch, even when there are warts on both candidates. The perfect is the enemy of the good…

Besides, if you wait for a site that has 100 larrys, you’ll be a lonely Sox fan.

And if there was such a place, I’d employ all of my out of work Dago cousins to put it to sleep.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't leave.

We need your even keel around here.

Both feet on the bandwagon.

by vince_ on Jun 21, 2008 1:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i want larry gone

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

war, dammit.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the neocons lost

They are some sneaky fucking bastards though

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Uhhh-ohhh...

The Negative Police!!!

Larry must want this place to be more like WSI.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he is the nba and whatever else you said police,

but not the negative police. all he said was he wouldn’t spend as much time on the site.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which is ridiculous...

If you are worried about “Dark Clouds”, I hear WSI is a great message board.

Being surprised that White Sox fans are negative is like being surprised that some Wrigleyville trixie is going to get drunk tonight and screw some random guy.

It’s just the way the fan base is.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think it's a good post...

cheat’s just pointing out what has been killing us in these past road games…those detroit games were all winnable…the TB games were winnable except for when kazmir shut us down…and today’s game was winnable…the offense has got to execute when leadoff guys get on

the bullpen has been brilliant for the most part except for when games are tied late in games on the road or when the winds blowing out…dotel hung a curveball today and left two pitches out on the outer half on the plate that lee hit out and that cabrera hit out last week…linebrink will be fine 2 walk off homeruns given up by him it happens…

the offense just has to step up and move a guy over every now and again…thome swinging at the first pitch after the BA double…terrible today…all he had to do was hit a groundball to the right side then OC can hit a sold ground ball or a fly ball instead of pushing for a base hit

the small things have killed us and will continue too if the crew can’t learn to execute

'08 all star game--vote early vote often....for pablo ozuna...he could be a late inning defensive replacement...

by furby2056 on Jun 20, 2008 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

isn't saying that the games were "winnable" kind of a good thing?

has anyone taken a look at the last time this team was blown out? or how many times they’ve been this season? how many more of these “winnable” games do people want the sox to win? 30%? 50%? all of them?

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i want larry to stay

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My bitch is that the term "execute" seems like it is tied to

“at will”. Goddamn, the game is tough. You can’t “execute” all the time. Why are the numbers so fascinating in baseball? Why do (especially you VORPers) we think we are making sense if we can attach a statistic to an event?

Someone asked me today what the stock market is going to do over the next 2 months. Like I know, right? 1/3 of the time no one has any earthly idea what makes a stock move in either direction. I think baseball, with all of the statistical measures, is kind of like that. You make your best guess predicated on certain stats that have no earthly way of incorporating all the possible variables affecting the outcome, and gnash your teeth when all your models don’t work.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i can understand your point on that man

but when you have the leadoff guy on 4 innings in a row and can’t do anything with that…it’s pretty bad

'08 all star game--vote early vote often....for pablo ozuna...he could be a late inning defensive replacement...

by furby2056 on Jun 20, 2008 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes it is frustrating

But we are still in first, still winning at home, still played a decent game today.

I just think its a little early to throw in the towel.

Do I think this is the 05 team? No, not really? Will it be a fun year? Yes. Do I think they will make the playoffs? Yes.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

stocks are efficient, move only with properly disseminated news and are eminently predictable.

i can’t believe you didn’t know that. all you have to do is watch cnbc for one day to find that out.

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 5:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was panicked in late in '05

But there was something special about that season that always left you with a little extra hope… And they were outperforming their pythag that season… You can’t take wins off the board. So even though the BPs of the world treated the Sox like a 90-win team, they felt better than that.

I seem to remember uttering the phrase “They’ll write books about this team” a number of times. —Here’s one turned up by search after Freddy’s 1-hitter loss…

They will write books about this team. One way or another this team will be remembered for a long time. They are either going to the be the second coming of the hitless wonders, making a postseason run with an offense straight out of the dead ball era; or they are going to be the biggest collapse in baseball history, the ‘69 Cubs would have nothing on us. It could go either way at this point. (Though I think you have a pretty good idea where I think this one is headed.)

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank god

they didn’t go the collapse way

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you nailed it, as is your wont.

And it was special. And I think folks expect the same kind of things to happen because it did in ‘05, so we know it can/should, goddammit, happen again. And that magic don’t come around very often. This year is special to me because I had no earthly idea we’d weven have a shot, so 9 games above .500 is pretty fucking good in my world.

You always have fantastic predictive abilities, and I am not taking issue with your conclusions. We’re not a great team – we are above average in a league that seems to have a lot of disappointing teams (guys are getting fired because of it), and we’re lucky that there are some major injuries to strategic personnel while we’ve been (relatively) unscathed.

But rather than get pissed or scared that we are going to fritter our slight advantages away, let’s have some goddamn fun. We got another shot at the fuckers tomorrow. We looked decent against a pretty good lefty today – how strange is that? We were in the game all the way. No one choked. We’re OK. We’re not great, we may not win the pennant (I’d stroke out if we did) but we have a great shot. Isn’t that what it’s about? Good game, shake hands, try and kick ass tomorrow.

Unless you are a Brit hooligan.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

crazy old man.

AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH IT'S OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by larry on Jun 20, 2008 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup

Before this season started some people and talking heads were predicting that even KC would be ahead of us at this point.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tell you what

Lets prove hoodlight wrong and show him that “we could last more the 5 minutes supporting an english team”

lets all meetup outside of Wrigley and walk around in a massive group looking for subs fans to beat up.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hell yeah!

Let’s see if Bleed Cubbie Blue is just an expression!

by ReservoirDog on Jun 21, 2008 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

one of our best hitters has pretty much been injured all year.

Think back to spring of 05’, we thought we would be ok then Thomas went down. When Thomas came back we were world beaters. We would have won 120 game with a healthy Thomas in 05’. The balance of our team was incredible. We were not “great” in any one area except (maybe) defense. I see a lot of that same overall balance in 08’. The difference is some of our older players were in their primes in 05’.

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Looking back at late '05

There are some great parallels… Some of my blowup posts…

I’ve written, deleted, and rewritten the first paragraph of this post at least a dozen times already. I don’t know if I can capture how dire the White Sox situation currently is without coming off like a chicken little.

Anyone who has watched this team since the beginning of August can tell you they’re going nowhere. But they’re still the same group of guys who raced to the best record in baseball the first two months of the season.

Can they regain the swagger they had in the first half of the season? Will they be able to hold off the surging Indians?—I don’t know, but there is still time to turn around this thing around. We can right the sinking ship.

  • Pablo Ozuna gets to second base with nobody out in a one-run game. Jermaine Dye fails to get him over. Aaron Rowand and Juan Uribe fail to get him in.
  • Paul Konerko pops up a meatball of a pitch while representing the winning run to end the game.
The Sox losing a Santana-pitched game doesn’t, in and of itself, send me searching for the nearest tall building. No, it was the way they lost this particular game that has me raiding the medicine cabinet for those extra sleeping pills.

  • 8th inning – Runners on 2nd and 3rd, 2 out - No runs
  • 9th inning – Bases Loaded, 1 out - No runs
  • 10th inning – Runners on 1st and 2nd, 1 out—No runs

Pushing across just one of those runners would have resulted in an unlikely victory for the Sox. These are the situations that “Ozzieball” was supposed to fix. These are the type of situations where playoffs teams find a way to score. The Indians, Yankees, and Red Sox easily would have scored given those opportunities. Even the Angels would have found a way. But the White Sox, they’re stuck in clutch hitting purgatory.

That I expect a loss in every game Santana starts, rather than hoping for a victory, probably says all you need to know about this offense.

I write this for me…. And sometimes I need to blowoff steam. I try to keep an even keel, but sometimes situations get the best of me…

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In all sincerity, it's good to see the main man get caught up

in it once in awhile. Numbers are great, but it’s in the heart where you feel it, not the head.

You’re a fan. Embrace it. It’s refreshing – I’m smiling. Thanks.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why do you think the site is worth, what, $154K?

Without “swagger” it’s $90K. Without AEG, it’s $85K. Without larry, it’s $75K.

Without SSH and WTGTD, it’s $249K.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hey!

where the fuck am I? blowing my dick myself?

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jun 20, 2008 9:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you have to ask, i'm guessing no.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 9:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or hung like a hamster, perhaps

;)

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

my contributions to this site are priceless.

They're gonna give daddy the Rain Man suite, you dig that?

by MarketMaker on Jun 21, 2008 6:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You POS, you

It’s 7:00+ PST on a Friday. You’re in SF. Get the fuck off this site and go get some.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Uncle Sugar never sleeps

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those are great to read

and thanks for sharing them.

Those Cleveland victories at the end of the season were a little extra special for me, because one of my best friends is a big Indians fans.

Also… he was talking massive amounts of shit this year. He had them winning the World Series against the Cubs.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh god

My Cub fans friends just called me and said they are playing beer pong… I said no thank you.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Is that like “Twister”?

I’m so old…

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

google

teabagging and get back to us

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get it, you know?

it’sa joke. Inhale and giggle, already. Grab some chips.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yikes

maybe I should start smoking again

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe?

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You'd like that wouldn't you

Are you like the old guys at my school that ask me if I can “score them some “weed” for there brother in law”?

;)

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because

I don’t drive drunk like they do. I don’t like slamming shit beer and I don’t feel like getting shit from them all night.

I’m just chilling with my Arcadia Ale IPAs and my 2 dogs.

Maybe a little GTA 4 to get rid of the aggression.

Plus like I keep mentioning its day 3 no cigarettes for me and walking into there would be like walking into a smoke pit.

... and what toonderstrook said

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sound like a big pussy to me...

i am hoping i can wake up for the game tomorrow.

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If being a "big pussy"

Keeps me from getting a DUI charge then so be it.

However, I did end up going out last night. I just had a friend pick me up. I didn’t however go play beer pong with my cubs fan friends. I don’t think I’ve played that game in 4 years.

by 815Sox on Jun 21, 2008 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

in reference to an earlier post that this series is meaningless to the fans

one only has to look at the reaction of this board to realize that is a bit more than meaningless, if only a little bit

by The Scoper on Jun 20, 2008 8:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Def.

I find it hard to believe any fan of either side that says these loses don’t sting even a little bit more then usual.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Arcadia is good

Used to get that all the time back in school at K College.

People love to pick the 2005 team as some bellweather of what a playoff team should look like. I hate to say it but that team won 99 fucking games on career years from half the guys on the staff. 99 games is pretty fucking hard to win and the Sox got lucky to get such great pitching all year long.

Don’t get me wrong, that team was fucking awesome, but not all good teams look like the 2005 Sox.

This team has problems, notably that the offense has too much suck—but they can still very easily win 90 games and take the division.

I’m not sure why Cheat is so focused on the shitty division—you play teh games that are on the schedule. Perhaps in some crazy KW mindfuck he knew the division was going to suck and so he traded the farm to win 90 games this year and roll the dice in teh playoffs.

or maybe not. But anyways this is fun again after the horror of 07.

by madvillian on Jun 20, 2008 8:53 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good point

And like I said earlier, with baseball, teams can come into the playoffs just playing better then the rest… even if they have less “talent”

who knew that the 05 team would lose only one game in the playoffs. Shit, I didn’t see one “anaylist” pick them to win it.

And yeah Arcadia is good. But if your up in KZoo then its all about Bells IMO

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well the division is shitty

and there are two teams who were picked to win 90 games pre-season. I wouldn’t be saying anythign if we were, say, 4 games better. An 8-game lead would feel pretty good. But those two teams (and even the Twins) can easily catch the Sox if they’re unable to get more consistent offensive production. I’d like some games in the bank.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Cleveland is done

They are going to start unloading soon.

D-Town is the only team I’m worried about, but I just don’t see it with there pitching.

Just my opinion of course.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 9:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how many losses have the sox had greater than three runs?

EIGHT

if you want a silver lining in all this. they have 32 losses and only EIGHT were by greater than three runs.

and of those eight…three losses were by four runs which one can argue that they were within one-half inning of all but FIVE of their games (btw one loss was by five runs)

so as we know, the pitching is keeping us in games and i imagine the pitching will still be there come september/october. the string of walk-off road losses seems to be just unlucky and as long as they continue to give themselves a chance in ballgames they should be fine

sox just need to win a few more of these close ones to solidfy themselves as dominant team in league. however, its not all doomsday. they are only 4 back in loss column for best record in mlb and 3 in al

by The Scoper on Jun 20, 2008 9:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice job

Is it too long to be your new sig? ‘Cause I think we need a constant reminder. Until we really do suck.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe it's just because I'm a pessimist

But that’s kinda what I’m getting at… The Sox have won a bunch of games, and they’ve been close in most of the others. But it’s those others that get me. A number of those should be victories. A good team puts a few extra of those in the W column.

And like I said in the comment above. I want some games in the bank. Konerko’s 15-day rip isn’t going to be the only injury we see this season, and I would have liked to have seen a bigger cushion to go along with those favorable numbers which come in large part thanks to the overall health of the club.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i hear ya

but its nice to know that the team is just one or two plays away from winning those close games and can only hope that it turns our way the later part of the season.

by The Scoper on Jun 20, 2008 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the Sox are a good team

You win some, you lose some.

Look at the Subbies loss to the Rays yesterday. Shouldn’t they have won that?

But I do hear what you are saying. Some of these games are really frustrating this year. Especially games like today.

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to be pollyanna-ish

or pile on, but I actually think that these are kinds of the games that good teams do lose—close games on the road and/or to (generally) good teams that are not pissed away through errors, bad baserunning, etc. The only game that has been truly upsetting to me through this “bad streak” was the first game of the Detroit series, where I did think we pissed the game away (and had a great chance to step on Detroit’s neck and blew it). The others have, for the most part, been well-played by the Sox.

Honestly, I remain hugely optimistic. This is an Earl Weaver team, and damn I love Earl Weaver teams.

by The Actual El Guapo on Jun 20, 2008 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And, equally as entertaining,

we have an Earl Weaver manager.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

'Zactly,

was just thinking that too.

Though somehow I doubt that Ozzie will sponsor any computer baseball sim games when he retires.

by The Actual El Guapo on Jun 20, 2008 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I loved listening to the recordings of Earl

and the umps. Hysterical. When is Ozzie gonna get mic’ed?

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where can I get me some of that?

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 21, 2008 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the season half way point has yet to be crossed

we should probably find out if that’s true

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 21, 2008 1:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

Rays just lost to Houston, the losers of 7-8 in a row, at home, 4-3. Yes, 4-3, a familiar score to many of us. I guess that means they suck. Cubs sweep be damned.

Per. Spec. Tive.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Damn

San Fran topping KC 8 to 4 in the 7th

The NL is clearly better then the AL this year

by 815Sox on Jun 20, 2008 9:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Holy Crap

Just returned from drinking to recoup and stopped in for a bit. When did Cheat transform into SSH2005?

“A good team puts a few extra of those in the W column.” Naw. A great team does. They are a good team and there is time left. Tough loss. I was pissed at Oz for taking out Danks but I guess I understand.

Cheat calm the fuck down. By your definition and rant there are like 2 good teams period. And I’ll take the Sox over the Angels all freaking day and would love that 1st round match up.

The SSS motto should be the answer to "What is our deepest fear?". Or maybe just Prozac.

by Tdogg on Jun 20, 2008 9:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL, big time

When did Cheat transform into SSH2005?

Tell it, brother. Tell it. But give the man a break. He’s a man – he’s just a man. He’s not a king. He’s just the same..as anyone I know.

He scares me so.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:35 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

you know you stepped to close to the line when you read that…

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 9:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that reminds me.

something you might be able to conjure in your head. noticed the other day how much steve winwood on the blind faith album sounds just like ian gillen in jcs.

Half Dome is my bitch. Shasta is next.

by Toonderstrook on Jun 20, 2008 9:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely

Stevie was hot in the day. man, “Can’t Find My Way Home” is one of my alltime faves. And JCS wasthe first full LP I’d ever listened to. man, the Catholic parents sat up and took effin’ notice on that one. I think “Judas’ Death” put them over the top.

Funny (to me) – my Jewish wife, 6 years younger than me, told me she was singing along to Yvonne Elliman’s “I Don’t Know How To Love Him” on JCS on her stereo when she was twelve or so when her Mom came roaring into the room.

That LP was a protest album for many of us in the day.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, my chance to be optimistic

I expect this team to contend into September. I think I’ll stick with my recent pick of Minnesota to win the division (cause I already picked them and I’d hate to be flip-flopper). But I wouldn’t shocked if the Sox (or Detroit) won it either. Maybe it’s a cripple-fight, but I’ll be entertained.

Moreover I think the Sox are actually better than a “true” .500 team, even if not by much. The fact that they have lost so many close games implies that with a little luck, they be significantly better record-wise.

Finally, look at how Williams acquisitions of younger players have worked out:

1) Danks is having a legit all-star season so far.
2) Q! has a .921 OPS
3) Swisher has shown he can play CF and is an excellent bet to post some .900 OPS seasons in the cell
4) Ramirez, whom no else wanted I guess, has a .748 OPS and can play SS
5) Floyd is coming back to earth with a rising HR rate, but I believe he’s a legit starter in AL
6) Even Brian Anderson, as a holdover, has shown signs of being a very good bench player

While it’s obviously a veteran heavy team, Williams has injected significant younger talent into the club. Enough that you can have hope for the near-future, even if they fail to kae the playoffs this season.

by hitlesswonder on Jun 20, 2008 9:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You had me until "kae"

Tourette’s?

;)

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spasm while typing, "kae" = "make"

I must still be jittery after today’s game. Maybe it’s time to finish off the bottle of Shiraz…

by hitlesswonder on Jun 20, 2008 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hit my Cab earlier

Calms…things…down.

CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.

by winningugly on Jun 20, 2008 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

woo-hoo

I met Drew Curtis back in ‘03 or so… talked to him a little about Fark.com, which I no longer visit. Back then he said he used to push the political discussions in particular far right or far left… He wasn’t doing his job, as far as he was concerned, if he wasn’t unfairly characterizing one side.

Discussion drove the site. Even if sometimes it got outta hand….

/Pretending I learned something

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Jun 20, 2008 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fark.com

Pretty fun site. I never really participated the in the discussions… but damn the political ones got heated during the bullshit Iraq invasion and when the idiots reelected Dubya.

I wish I could go back and say “told you so” but whats the point. We are all fucked now.

Anyways good night

and oh… no way the Twins win this division. Like I said before, D-Town is the only threat and there pitching sucks. I’ve seen no evidence that shows that the Sox are not the best team in this division.

by 815Sox on Jun 21, 2008 1:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be honest, Cubs is THE better team.

I wish them to sweep Sox twice this year, but lose in the World Series to Red Sox. Heartbreaking for the Cubbies. It is really end of world for them. Sox, this year, by my observation, no chance. Still wating for their 4th title.

by zj-uic on Jun 20, 2008 10:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Put me in the wu, larry tdogg camp

Don’t get too high, don’t get too low. It’s just one game. And I’m pretty sure I was one of the few folks who remained positive down the stretch in ‘05. And no I didn’t do the research (I’m too lazy today). Let’s get ‘em tommorow and if we lose tommorow lets get em the next day. And hang in there larry.

by bhoov on Jun 20, 2008 10:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

05 is special year. No one including GM and the owners, the fans, even sox players expect to win it all.

08 is different. Sox in the race. So everyone expects them to win something. They probably won’t. Don’t compare to 05 any more. Sox won’t win anther title any time soon. This Sox is small team with a cheap owner. Only the other Sox team can.

by zj-uic on Jun 20, 2008 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What?

Uhh.. do you remember the predictions most of us were making before this year? Shit, some so called “analysists” were saying we would do worse then KC.

For me (and I suspect some others) this season so far has been pretty great. Who would have though we would be so far ahead in the division at this point of the season. Just enjoy it.

And no we aren’t the 05 squad… but so? We are getting it done for the most part. I think we will make the playoffs. I don’t think we will win, but still I’m having way more fun this year then I thought I would.

by 815Sox on Jun 21, 2008 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Photobucket

"I would rather have a battalion of German soldiers in front of me than a platoon of French soldiers behind me."

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jun 21, 2008 4:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not much to be positive about tonight...

The Sox lost to the Cubs, the Twins won, and the Indians are winning 2-0.

Sox lead down to 3.5 games.

by SSH2005 on Jun 20, 2008 10:36 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

DET lost

Fun fact: Fernando Rodney’s 2008 ERA is currently Infinity. The ESPN box score didn’t indicate if it his ERA is countably infinite (like the set of integers) or uncountably infinite (like the set of real numbers), but it presumably is the former.

by hitlesswonder on Jun 21, 2008 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow...

Dodgers making the big comeback against the Indians. Borowski is very close to blowing this one.

by SSH2005 on Jun 21, 2008 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

CLE scored 2 in the 10th

For my best friends sake I hope they win. This has been a painful enough year for him.

Though he did say he thinks the tribe could still win it. I disagree.. they are going to unload soon IMO

by 815Sox on Jun 21, 2008 1:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Making the terms Tdogg's bet to larry

Will you take the over on 86 wins for the Twins?

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 21, 2008 3:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would say 85 wins for the Twinkies...

but all of you guys also had and still have the Indians finishing ahead of the Twins.

by SSH2005 on Jun 21, 2008 8:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

based on what?

A hot streak? They have given up the most runs in the division, the twins wont be anywhere around at the end of the season. The Tigers will be ahead of them.

The SSS motto should be the answer to "What is our deepest fear?". Or maybe just Prozac.

by Tdogg on Jun 21, 2008 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Returning to this thread after some much needed alcohol at the bar.

I still stand by my earlier post.

This is not a great team. But they are a good team, and to look at a single stretch of 7 road games to define the season is ridiculous. If you only look at the last 10 or 12 home games, the Sox look like world-beaters. You could read off a bunch of stats from those games and make a case that the Sox are the bestest team to ever play. That isn’t any more the case then looking at the last 7 road games and saying the Sox are doomed.

The fact is the Sox only need to be good enough to make it into the playoffs and then get hot (see 2006 Cardinals). In a weak division, this is easily possible. The only real threat right now are the Tigers. I’d say we’ve exposed the Twins – they are who we thought they are. The Indians are probably too injured to be a real threat.

Part of me wonders if Cheat is just pulling an Ozzie here to get us riled up and snapped out of our game thread funk. Even if unintentional, it seems to be having the desired effect.

Both feet on the bandwagon.

by vince_ on Jun 21, 2008 1:27 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It looks like larry, WU and toonder are all on the same side

from my experience here, that usually means that that side is right. in the very least, it should mean the other side hasn’t made its argument fully.

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 21, 2008 5:31 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Question

Doesn’t it seem to be a little over the top to be criticizing a team for not putting away a division before July in a season that expectations were blah?

I agree with Vince, Cheat just went Ozzie on us. Step up the commentary folks!

The SSS motto should be the answer to "What is our deepest fear?". Or maybe just Prozac.

by Tdogg on Jun 21, 2008 8:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

So I gather its not over the top to you

Yep division should now be put away on June 21st.

The SSS motto should be the answer to "What is our deepest fear?". Or maybe just Prozac.

by Tdogg on Jun 21, 2008 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How many teams have put away divisions at this point? What would that look like?

And will you for once explain your reasoning for why the Twins are good?

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jun 21, 2008 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago White Sox.
Start posting about the White Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Frank_thomas_small
Do The Right Thing
Georgia1_small
Beckham is not only good, but classy
Deadhorse_small
White Sox Minor League Update: I just want to say one word to you - just one word.... 'prospects'.
Stash1_small
Buerhle might wanna take a drive down Lake Shore Drive next slump

Recent FanPosts

Img_0161_small
This is probably old but whatevs, Twins get new uniforms
Small
Three way deal for Gonzalez?
Belle-thomas_small
Will we all be disappointed this offseason
Aroldis_chapman_small
A letter from a Cuban fan inside Cuba
Dead_horse_4_small
Why the nickname bacon sucks and why you should all stop using it.
Bear_down_small
Ozzie Joining FOX For World Series

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Tim Lincecum Hearts WHIP, Tells Greinke To Pound FIP
ESPN - OTL: Field of Schemes?
Top Ten BR sponsorships
Zack Greinke hearts FIP
Beginning Wednesday, street light banners commemorating a series of special events in Chicago are going on the auction block for charity.

Some of the banners were shown off Tuesday, including those featuring Pres. Barack Obama both before and after his election.

A White Sox World Series Championship banner, signed by pitcher Mark Buehrle, is also being sold, as is a Blackhawks playoff banner signed by Denis Savard and Stan Mikita.

The bidding starts at 12 p.m. Wednesday at Daley Center. Money raised goes to help the Chicago Anti-hunger Federation and the Greater Chicago Food Depository.
John Danks is a MLB scout
Yankees' key to financial success
Buehrle wins Gold Glove
Dotel & Dye are Type A Free Agents
Jim's Off-Season Sox Schedule...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SPONSORS

South Side Sox on Facebook

Managing Editor

Thecheatsmoking_small The Cheat

Editors

Deadhorse_small larry

Sealab_murphy_small colintj

Scenemissingsss_small thecip

Dog_small homesickalien

Omar_small U-God

Authors

Headerrock_bigger_small shaftr

17258_0003_small The Actual El Guapo