Blame AL Dominance on the Republicans
Just as this talent haul began, something else broke in the AL's favor: the Tax Reform Act of 1986. This act, which was aimed at simplifying the tax code, was also expected to curtail the public financing of stadiums. It limited the amount that tax-free stadium bonds could be financed by team rent payments. But the law did not make public officials any less eager to subsidize new stadiums. To accommodate the law, they just charged teams little or no rent -- making it more attractive than ever for teams to demand new parks. "It's a major economic advantage," says Andrew Zimbalist, an economist at Smith College.
While 10 NL teams played in ballparks built in the 1960s and 1970s that were once the envy of baseball, there were more AL teams playing in older parks that needed replacing. In 1992, the Baltimore Orioles moved into Oriole Park at Camden Yards, which inspired a wave of retro-style, baseball-focused ballparks in downtown entertainment districts. Thanks to improved attendance, a favorable lease and the stadium's abundant luxury seating, the Orioles turned an operating profit of roughly $25 million in its first season.
about 1 month ago
winningugly
11 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Oversimplified analysis, in an election year?
Surely you jest!
by rhythm on Jul 11, 2008 11:12 AM CDT 0 recs
so, before 1986 teams used their rent payments to finance building their stadiums but the 'tax reform act' stopped that?
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by The Wizard on Jul 11, 2008 1:47 PM CDT 0 recs
I assume the city/state borrowed against the future rent payments
Now they borrow against tax increases, correct? That’s why cities vote on referendums to increases taxes to finance stadiums, iirc.
by joewho112 on
Jul 11, 2008 2:00 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I love the caveat where the author mentinons league dominance is cyclical
But hey uhhh don’t forget about all that previous gold I wrote!
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 11, 2008 2:36 PM CDT 0 recs
I liked that, too
“Everything I just said is BS, but I kept your attention for 7 minutes. Joke’s on you!”
CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.
by winningugly on
Jul 11, 2008 3:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
simply because something is cyclical does not mean that it's a product of randomness.
"What'cha gonna do brother when Ozunamania runs wild on you?"
by larry on
Jul 12, 2008 12:36 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Right - cyclical nature of things means
there is some predicability – ebb and flow – not the product of singular, non-recurring events (like the tax law change of 1986).
PS How was Wiggly Field? Did you take a Bible with you to ward off the evil?
CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.
by winningugly on
Jul 12, 2008 2:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
did you and i read the same article?
didn’t the guy cite, like a half dozen reasons?
"What'cha gonna do brother when Ozunamania runs wild on you?"
by larry on
Jul 12, 2008 3:56 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Uh, no
1. DH
2. Money
3. Luck
4. Stupidity re: long-term contracts
5. Cyclicality
Dh/Money/Luck seem to be the big ones. So DH (structure) and money (tax reform/stadium funding) are the biggies other than the business cycle.
Maybe we interpreted the article differently.
CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.
by winningugly on
Jul 12, 2008 11:02 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Bipartisan
Democratic congress, Republican president.
We can work together!
Coffee is for closers.
by vince_ on Jul 11, 2008 7:22 PM CDT 0 recs
Good job, v
CWS: Slashing negative expectations since May, 2008.
by winningugly on
Jul 11, 2008 8:25 PM CDT
up
0 recs

















