Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ellenberger vs. Sanchez Heats Up, Hughes Talks Retirement

Brushing Up On Joe Blanton

Blanton is an interesting pitcher.  As his charts show, he, seemingly, has no above average pitch.  He's got the lowest K rates across the board that I've seen so far and he survives in large part on smarts.  For example, check out his 1-0 counts, 2-0 counts and 2-1 counts against LHB.  Blanton is basically pitching backwards here.  Counts where he'd normally have to bring the fastball, you've got about a 50-50 shot on 1-0 and 2-0 and, on 2-1, it's only 1/3 fastballs.  The result, here, is that he is often able to get weakly hit outs (he's managed a ~ .100 ISO in '07 and '08 with the pitch) or, also importantly, yet another pitch in a more favorable count.  It's safe to say that the change is his most important pitch for getting lefties out.  And it mostly works.  BP's projected RHB/LHB split is .264/.319/.402 vs..271/.341/.410.  The difference in the projected walk rate is notable, but it hasn't come to fruition.

Against RHB, he's a fastball-curve-slider pitcher and it's all about his curve.  While the BABIP on pitches is going to take a while to come to rest at a reasonable rate, the ISO is no joke.  It's 0 so far and last year it was .143.  In other words, this is how Blanton gets his groundballs.  It isn't on his meh fastball, with a .247 ISO to RHB, nor is it on the slider, which has little going for it.  It's telling, I think, that he throws the slider for so few strikes and he's still giving up a .223 ISO on the pitch.  His confidence in the pitch is apparently low; the usage rate dips significantly once he gets into 2+ ball counts.  And it makes sense, it's a hittable pitch. That's usually not something you want to throw while behind.

So what's the approach?  For RHB, you must (MUST!) lay off the curve.  No good will come from swinging at it.  It's better to think of it as an outstanding sinker.  Unless it's elevated and you've seen it already and you as a hitter have some aptitude for hitting curves, don't touch it.  The fastball and slider, OTOH, are very hittable.  The key is to get the right one.  He doesn't nibble with the fastball and without the luxury of the changeup, it comes more or less undisguised. 

LHB have their work cut out.  The fastball is imminently crushable and if it's on the inner half, it's probably a fastball.  With a change up pitcher, I think it's best in the first time through to try to go the other way and cover the plate while seeing as many pitches as you can.  I think this is the best way to convince the opposing pitcher to try to get back inside and, hopefully, abandon the change a bit as a result.  For once (and this will no doubt screw him), I like AJ's chances.  He's great at going to the opposite field and his open stance, I think, allows him to recognize the change up better.  Thome has a chance to do well; he's already hit 3 HR on change ups this year.

Given the run scoring environment, I like our chances to put up a crooked number against Blanton.  He's a smart pitcher and should be fun to watch because of it, but he's the kind of guy who's going to thrive with Oakland's pitching-and-defense oriented team and ballpark.  Because of the sheer number of batted balls he allows, in the Cell, this is a backwards approach.  Lay off the curve and he's got plenty of pitches that White Sox hitters can put loft on.

 

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

speaking of the treadmill to nowhere


Louisiana passes first antievolution “academic freedom” law

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080627-louisiana-passes-first-antievolution-academic-freedom-law.html

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jul 4, 2008 9:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Scary shit

“Unfortunately, it’s remarkably selective in its suggestion of topics that need critical thinking, as it cites scientific subjects “including, but not limited to, evolution, the origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.”“

“Lining up to promote the bill were a coalition of religious organizations and Seattle’s pro-Intelligent Design think tank, the Discovery Institute. According to the Louisiana Science Coalition, Discovery fellows helped write the bill and arranged for testimony in its favor in the legislature.”

by 815Sox on Jul 4, 2008 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

What's scary?

Show mercy. I get to watch the Rangers.

by Tim from Texas on Jul 5, 2008 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

allowing the school board to use hocus-pocus stuff instead of rigorously tested and proven scientific theories

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jul 5, 2008 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah I saw an episode of Nova on that yesterday

Basically trying to reestablish some semblance of the church back in school. Not cool.

How do you fuck a nut?!

by omnipotent grab on Jul 5, 2008 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes basically

The thing that pisses me off is the tactics used, we have a clear seperation of church v state, which is included in our public system. No reason to try to confuse the issue with this bullshit.

Its like these evangelical kids that used to hand out flyers for “raves” (I was in high school when the rave scene was very popular… well popular for the second time) which we Christian events.. these flyers would never mention it though. I never went.

As for the “real” ones… well no comment but I’ll let you guess… haha

by 815Sox on Jul 5, 2008 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Does this take evo beyond the theoretical?

Maybe some states are just plain lower on the evolutionary scale.

by tommyjoepeters on Jul 4, 2008 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

what's really too bad is either how stupid or manipulative the people who were pushing for this have to be

either they know their “science” is bullshit and they’re fucking with kids educations or they literally believe that this shit can supplant real science.

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jul 5, 2008 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow. You guys seem to be as certain

on what is today’s scientific fact as those that claimed the earth revolved the sun was fact hundreds of years ago. I’d be cautious, even Darwin shook up what was felt to be scientific ‘fact’ at the time. What’s wrong with discussion?

Show mercy. I get to watch the Rangers.

by Tim from Texas on Jul 5, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

...from Texas.

once we actually get some scientists, and not politicians and theologians, who are questioning scientific theory, let me know. until then, i think i’ll stick with not wasting taxpayers dollars on junk.

If there's a baseball equivalent to "never fight a land war in Asia," Vizzini might tell us "never buy the decline years of a player."

by larry on Jul 5, 2008 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem is "Intelligent Design" is not being promoted at the scientific front

It is being promoted as a religious tool. We don’t teach religion in public schools, it’s bullshit. If parents wanted kids to learn creationism, they could enroll in Christian schools or go to Sunday School via church.

I agree that dismissing a theory is not the right thing to do. Evolution can’t be proven as indisputable fact, but then again many things in science are not 100% foolproof, that’s the nature of the subject, to encourage more investigation into things. What the religious zealots in this country have done, is mangle the subject with discussions of religion for no real reason.

by Ozzie Montana on Jul 5, 2008 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

nothing's wrong with discussion

the problem is that it isn’t just discussion

people elect school board members that decide how the children of the general population will be taught how life evolved
these people put their religious beliefs first and ignore what has been proven by scientists

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jul 5, 2008 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

you mean you don't agree that this could be your great-grandfather?

If there's a baseball equivalent to "never fight a land war in Asia," Vizzini might tell us "never buy the decline years of a player."

by larry on Jul 5, 2008 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Merkin's nails it in his headline


Buehrle’s bad day sinks White Sox

http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/news/gameday_recap.jsp?ymd=20080704&content_id=3067135&vkey=recap&fext=.jsp&c_id=cws

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jul 4, 2008 11:29 PM CDT reply actions  

from jim's minor league froundup
Spotlight on… Jason Bourgeois

Normally I try to reserve this spot for legitimate prospecty prospects, but Bourgeois’ emergence from a two-month slumber makes the idea of keeping Pablo Ozuna on the roster even more questionable.

Bourgeois hit a whopping .393/.442/.592 over 116 at-bats in June, with seven doubles, two triples and four homers. He’s quickly catching up to his quality 2007 numbers, during which he set career highs in most categories. The only area where his performance is lacking is basestealing, as he finished June only 10-for-18, after going 38-for-47 between Birmingham and Charlotte last season.

To my knowledge, he has played only second, center in left in the White Sox organization, but he has prior experience playing the left side of the infield. If Ozzie Guillen would play Juan Uribe at third, we’d finally know if Ozuna could be expunged from the system once and for all.

http://soxmachine.com/blogs/soxmachine/archive/2008/07/04/13316.aspx

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Jul 5, 2008 12:47 PM CDT reply actions  

if you say so, Han

are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM

by colintj on Jul 5, 2008 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to South Side Sox! Please check our new standards and guide to FanPosts/FanShots before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jacksoncloseup_small
BMO 2021: When Buehrle closes in on 300/3000
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: Counting of the heads (Meet-up 2012)
Avatarsing_small
2012 White Sox PECOTA
Archerme_small
RRRR: Oscars, wild.
Mrsparkleorig_small
Calling all new readers and lurkers: Open thread on Feb. 6

Recent FanPosts

Rudylaw_small
Hitting Instruction
61y5zkwuutl__sl500__small
High and Tight on the Mendoza Line
Small
Oswalt?
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: Dental dams and other reasons to kill people
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: HSALTP! SL. SLTP!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

White Sox Sign Fukudome
Cespedes to Athletics.
Brooks Boyer Defends 2012 Slogan
2012 Chicago White Sox Consensus Top 36 Prospects
Top 101 Baseball Prospects
Marlins Make Offer to Cespedes
Bill James: Open Letter To The Hall Of Fame
Keith Law says our minor league system sucks - hard.
Boom Goes the Dynamically Priced Tickets!
Does Mark Parent regret leaving the Reading Phillies? Because, man, if I'd known this was coming...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managing Editor

Mrsparkleorig_small Jim Margalus

Editors

Deadhorse_small larry

Sealab_murphy_small colintj

Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small homesickalien

Omar_small U-God

Authors

10083hb_small KenWo4LiFe

Archerme_small Teahenny Penny