Brushing Up On Joe Blanton
Blanton is an interesting pitcher. As his charts show, he, seemingly, has no above average pitch. He's got the lowest K rates across the board that I've seen so far and he survives in large part on smarts. For example, check out his 1-0 counts, 2-0 counts and 2-1 counts against LHB. Blanton is basically pitching backwards here. Counts where he'd normally have to bring the fastball, you've got about a 50-50 shot on 1-0 and 2-0 and, on 2-1, it's only 1/3 fastballs. The result, here, is that he is often able to get weakly hit outs (he's managed a ~ .100 ISO in '07 and '08 with the pitch) or, also importantly, yet another pitch in a more favorable count. It's safe to say that the change is his most important pitch for getting lefties out. And it mostly works. BP's projected RHB/LHB split is .264/.319/.402 vs..271/.341/.410. The difference in the projected walk rate is notable, but it hasn't come to fruition.
Against RHB, he's a fastball-curve-slider pitcher and it's all about his curve. While the BABIP on pitches is going to take a while to come to rest at a reasonable rate, the ISO is no joke. It's 0 so far and last year it was .143. In other words, this is how Blanton gets his groundballs. It isn't on his meh fastball, with a .247 ISO to RHB, nor is it on the slider, which has little going for it. It's telling, I think, that he throws the slider for so few strikes and he's still giving up a .223 ISO on the pitch. His confidence in the pitch is apparently low; the usage rate dips significantly once he gets into 2+ ball counts. And it makes sense, it's a hittable pitch. That's usually not something you want to throw while behind.
So what's the approach? For RHB, you must (MUST!) lay off the curve. No good will come from swinging at it. It's better to think of it as an outstanding sinker. Unless it's elevated and you've seen it already and you as a hitter have some aptitude for hitting curves, don't touch it. The fastball and slider, OTOH, are very hittable. The key is to get the right one. He doesn't nibble with the fastball and without the luxury of the changeup, it comes more or less undisguised.
LHB have their work cut out. The fastball is imminently crushable and if it's on the inner half, it's probably a fastball. With a change up pitcher, I think it's best in the first time through to try to go the other way and cover the plate while seeing as many pitches as you can. I think this is the best way to convince the opposing pitcher to try to get back inside and, hopefully, abandon the change a bit as a result. For once (and this will no doubt screw him), I like AJ's chances. He's great at going to the opposite field and his open stance, I think, allows him to recognize the change up better. Thome has a chance to do well; he's already hit 3 HR on change ups this year.
Given the run scoring environment, I like our chances to put up a crooked number against Blanton. He's a smart pitcher and should be fun to watch because of it, but he's the kind of guy who's going to thrive with Oakland's pitching-and-defense oriented team and ballpark. Because of the sheer number of batted balls he allows, in the Cell, this is a backwards approach. Lay off the curve and he's got plenty of pitches that White Sox hitters can put loft on.
0 recs |
25 comments
Comments
speaking of the treadmill to nowhere
Louisiana passes first antievolution “academic freedom” law
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by The Wizard on Jul 4, 2008 9:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Scary shit
“Unfortunately, it’s remarkably selective in its suggestion of topics that need critical thinking, as it cites scientific subjects “including, but not limited to, evolution, the origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.”“
“Lining up to promote the bill were a coalition of religious organizations and Seattle’s pro-Intelligent Design think tank, the Discovery Institute. According to the Louisiana Science Coalition, Discovery fellows helped write the bill and arranged for testimony in its favor in the legislature.”
by 815Sox on Jul 4, 2008 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's scary?
Show mercy. I get to watch the Rangers.
by Tim from Texas on Jul 5, 2008 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
allowing the school board to use hocus-pocus stuff instead of rigorously tested and proven scientific theories
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by The Wizard on Jul 5, 2008 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I saw an episode of Nova on that yesterday
Basically trying to reestablish some semblance of the church back in school. Not cool.
How do you fuck a nut?!
by omnipotent grab on Jul 5, 2008 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes basically
The thing that pisses me off is the tactics used, we have a clear seperation of church v state, which is included in our public system. No reason to try to confuse the issue with this bullshit.
Its like these evangelical kids that used to hand out flyers for “raves” (I was in high school when the rave scene was very popular… well popular for the second time) which we Christian events.. these flyers would never mention it though. I never went.
As for the “real” ones… well no comment but I’ll let you guess… haha
by 815Sox on Jul 5, 2008 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does this take evo beyond the theoretical?
Maybe some states are just plain lower on the evolutionary scale.
by tommyjoepeters on Jul 4, 2008 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what's really too bad is either how stupid or manipulative the people who were pushing for this have to be
either they know their “science” is bullshit and they’re fucking with kids educations or they literally believe that this shit can supplant real science.
are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM
by colintj on Jul 5, 2008 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow. You guys seem to be as certain
on what is today’s scientific fact as those that claimed the earth revolved the sun was fact hundreds of years ago. I’d be cautious, even Darwin shook up what was felt to be scientific ‘fact’ at the time. What’s wrong with discussion?
Show mercy. I get to watch the Rangers.
by Tim from Texas on Jul 5, 2008 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
...from Texas.
once we actually get some scientists, and not politicians and theologians, who are questioning scientific theory, let me know. until then, i think i’ll stick with not wasting taxpayers dollars on junk.
If there's a baseball equivalent to "never fight a land war in Asia," Vizzini might tell us "never buy the decline years of a player."
by larry on Jul 5, 2008 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is "Intelligent Design" is not being promoted at the scientific front
It is being promoted as a religious tool. We don’t teach religion in public schools, it’s bullshit. If parents wanted kids to learn creationism, they could enroll in Christian schools or go to Sunday School via church.
I agree that dismissing a theory is not the right thing to do. Evolution can’t be proven as indisputable fact, but then again many things in science are not 100% foolproof, that’s the nature of the subject, to encourage more investigation into things. What the religious zealots in this country have done, is mangle the subject with discussions of religion for no real reason.
by Ozzie Montana on Jul 5, 2008 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
nothing's wrong with discussion
the problem is that it isn’t just discussion
people elect school board members that decide how the children of the general population will be taught how life evolved
these people put their religious beliefs first and ignore what has been proven by scientists
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by The Wizard on Jul 5, 2008 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you mean you don't agree that this could be your great-grandfather?

If there's a baseball equivalent to "never fight a land war in Asia," Vizzini might tell us "never buy the decline years of a player."
by larry on Jul 5, 2008 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
From the Canadian side no doubt
Show mercy. I get to watch the Rangers.
by Tim from Texas on Jul 6, 2008 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Merkin's nails it in his headline
Buehrle’s bad day sinks White Sox
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by The Wizard on Jul 4, 2008 11:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Cox
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by The Wizard on Jul 5, 2008 12:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Alexei with dear old dad.

How do you fuck a nut?!
by omnipotent grab on Jul 5, 2008 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they're trying to figure out how to say "why the fuck is juan uribe playing"
how long before john and jordan danks sit atop the brothers home run list?
by furby2056 on Jul 5, 2008 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
from jim's minor league froundup
Spotlight on… Jason Bourgeoishttp://soxmachine.com/blogs/soxmachine/archive/2008/07/04/13316.aspxNormally I try to reserve this spot for legitimate prospecty prospects, but Bourgeois’ emergence from a two-month slumber makes the idea of keeping Pablo Ozuna on the roster even more questionable.
Bourgeois hit a whopping .393/.442/.592 over 116 at-bats in June, with seven doubles, two triples and four homers. He’s quickly catching up to his quality 2007 numbers, during which he set career highs in most categories. The only area where his performance is lacking is basestealing, as he finished June only 10-for-18, after going 38-for-47 between Birmingham and Charlotte last season.
To my knowledge, he has played only second, center in left in the White Sox organization, but he has prior experience playing the left side of the infield. If Ozzie Guillen would play Juan Uribe at third, we’d finally know if Ozuna could be expunged from the system once and for all.
The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.
by The Wizard on Jul 5, 2008 12:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sortof nervous about tonights game
I have a bad feeling about it…
by 815Sox on Jul 5, 2008 3:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if you say so, Han
are you trying to use stats around here? what the fuck do you think this is? - MM
by colintj on Jul 5, 2008 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
NEVER TELL ME THE ODDS.
Never trust a big butt and a smile.
Sox Machine
by Sox Machine on Jul 5, 2008 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















