Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Sox Minor League Update: Hibernation Edition with Prospects Lists from John Sickels, Baseball Prospectus, and Deric McKamey

John Sickels released his 50/50 list to those who purchased his book.

 

Hitting Prospects

 

22)  Gordon Beckham, SS, Chicago White Sox, Grade B+

 

Pitching Prospects

 

16) Aaron Poreda, LHP, Chicago White Sox, Grade B+

 

Obviously, Beckham was not on last year's list; he is placed in the top third of B+ hitting prospects. For Poreda this represents a jump from #22 and places him in the middle of B+ pitching prospects.

 

 

For the overall list, no real surprises. Wieters and Price each #1.

SouthSideSox is a community driven site. As such, users are able to express their thoughts and opinions in a FanPost, such as this one, which represents the views of this particular fan, but not necessarily the entire community or SouthSideSox editors.

Comment 75 comments  |  16 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks!

Now back to sleep…

"A good cigar is like a beautiful chick with a great body who also knows the American League box scores. "
Klinger

by Chiburb on Jan 28, 2009 10:27 AM CST reply actions  

who was immediately ahead and behind both of them in the rankings?

thanks lare

Michael Phelps can swim faster than you can run. He can probably swim faster than you can break the sound barrier. If you and a friend are swimming, and Michael Phelps is coming to eat you, you only have to be faster than your friend.

Just kidding. Michael Phelps will catch up with and eat the shit out of both of you.

by U-God on Jan 28, 2009 10:27 AM CST reply actions  

21) Jordan Schafer, OF, Atlanta Braves, Grade B+
22) Gordon Beckham, SS, Chicago White Sox, Grade B+
23) Fernando Martinez, OF, New York Mets, Grade B+

15) Tim Alderson, RHP, San Francisco Giants, Grade B+
16) Aaron Poreda, LHP, Chicago White Sox, Grade B+
17) Jarrod Parker, RHP, Arizona Diamondbacks, Grade B+

by larry on Jan 28, 2009 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

dang

not bad company

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Jan 28, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions  

I saw that #15 Tim Alderson pitch in high school out here in Az many times

Kid threw 92+ with a nasty slider. And being about 6’7 high school hitters didn’t really stand a chance.
Hoytsstash noticed he only threw from the stretch in high school. Never once from the windup.
I think he’s only two years removed from high school…

Cuz I know everybody gives a shit….

"wow, yeah. cubs ST should be awesome. have a great time."
-by Larry on Jan. 9, 2009 3:09 PM PST

by Hoytsstash on Jan 28, 2009 5:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks

ordering his book this week.

"It just occurred to me that the White Sox could win the division."

by SuddenSam on May 22, 2008 9:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

" That just makes me want to puke all over your head, sir."

by Tdogg on Jan 28, 2009 10:37 AM CST reply actions  

Guillen hinted that 2008 No. 1 pick Gordon Beckham might be destined for a position change.

"Alexei Ramirez is going to be my shortstop for a while," Guillen said.

http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/2009/02/sundays-session-has-guillen-on-his-toes.html

by larry on Feb 1, 2009 3:37 PM CST reply actions  

ozzie likes aaron
Guillen loves Poreda’s eagerness and described an exhibition game where Poreda told his manager he was glad for merely having the opportunity to sit on the bench.

“Pretty soon, he’ll be in the big leagues and you will enjoy the way this kid pitches,” Guillen said.

http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports_hardball/soxfest-2009/

by larry on Feb 1, 2009 4:59 PM CST reply actions  

Goldstein's White Sox Prospects
Five-Star Prospects
1. Gordon Beckham, SS
Four-Star Prospects
2. Aaron Poreda, LHP
3. Brandon Allen, 1B
Three-Star Prospects
4. Dayan Viciedo, 3B
5. Tyler Flowers, C
6. John Shelby, CF
7. Jordan Danks, CF
8. Chris Getz, 2B
Two-Star Prospects
9. Clayton Richard, LHP
10. Brent Morel, 3B
11. Jose Martinez, RF

Just Missed: Dexter Carter, RHP; Jeff Marquez, RHP; Juan Silverio, SS

Ranking Challenges: Beckham is a first-rank talent who is head and shoulders above the others, and while Poreda has tons of potential, he also comes with a fair share of uncertainty. Allen received outstanding reviews from scouts, especially those who saw him as he was finishing up last season at Double-A Birmingham, and that gives him the edge over Viciedo, who brings both significant positives and negatives to the table. Flowers rates as an easy fifth-best, and slots six through 11 are more or less a toss-up of a half-dozen players of similar promise.



The Sleeper: Brent Lillibridge, also acquired in the Javier Vazquez trade, has seen his prospect star droop considerably over the past two years, but he’s still a speedster with some on-base skills who can play nearly anywhere on the diamond.

Top 10 Talents 25 and Under (as of Opening Day 2009)

1. Gordon Beckham, SS
2. John Danks, LHP
3. Aaron Poreda, LHP
4. Brandon Allen, 1B
5. Dayan Viciedo, 3B
6. Tyler Flowers, C
7. John Shelby, CF
8. Jordan Danks, CF
9. Chris Getz, 2B
10. Clayton Richard, LHP


I must admit that I went back and forth with Beckham and Danks at number one here. I wouldn’t put up a huge argument if someone wanted me to reverse this order; it just seems that Beckham doesn’t come with much risk, and as an offensive talent he has more impact potential. Needless to say, the White Sox are not a young team.

Summary: Once among the worst systems in the game, the additions of Beckham, Viciedo, and Flowers raise the organization’s spread of talent substantially, but it remains well below average due to a severe lack of depth. With an older roster that could run into issues with injuries and performance drop-offs, that could be a problem.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=8459

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 10:34 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

There is no way I would put Beckham above Danks

I don’t follow the minor league stuff close enough after the first few guys to have much to say other than that.

Semantics wise, I have a quibble with saying, “once among the worst in the game” and with an infusion of talent still “well below average”. Those two things imply basically the same thing.

I’d change it to just “still below average”.

But hey, who gives a shit.

by madvillian on Feb 2, 2009 10:40 AM CST up reply actions  

That's Jordan, not John.

;)

Seriously, are you serious? Becks is the real deal, at least in our system.

I would rather douse a newspaper in gasoline, wrap it around my penis and light it on fire then relive that experience
by armedpp on Aug 29, 2007 2:36 AM EDT

by winningugly on Feb 2, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

I think a 24 year old LHP that just put up a 139 era+ over 196IP

is about talented as it gets.

If Beckham puts up a 140 OPS+ in 550PA as a 23 year old adequate d 2B I will eat my hat. Then shit myself in joy.

by madvillian on Feb 2, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

I see he has Allen as a 4 star

Has Sickel upgraded him yet? I saw the discussion surrounding his rating.

"It just occurred to me that the White Sox could win the division."

by SuddenSam on May 22, 2008 9:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

" That just makes me want to puke all over your head, sir."

by Tdogg on Feb 2, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions  

I am actually a little surprised

to see Shelby still this ‘highly’ regarded. Kind of nitpicking, but I would almost certainly put Richard ahead of him and arguably Getz as well. Just not fond of the serious plate discipline regression this past year in a league where he was a tad old.

by jc2313 on Feb 2, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

he's got the tools

he plays up the middle and he hasn’t been through AA yet. it looks okay to me.

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Feb 2, 2009 5:14 PM CST up reply actions  

disclaimer

colin’s opinion of shelby could be very different in a half hour.

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 5:18 PM CST up reply actions  

if a couple people would recommend this post, i would appreciate it.

i got mckamey’s book on friday but have been quite busy and haven’t had time to post his stuff – will do that later today, hopefully, so you can look forward to that.

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 10:50 AM CST reply actions  

Thanks

for all these posts, Larry. Good stuff. Have others seen Allen play? Thoughts?

by palehose67 on Feb 2, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

some tidbits from the goldstein on the popular sox prospects for those who don't have a BP subscription.

keep in mind that goldstein spends a great deal of time talking to scouts and front office types for their opinions on players (both from those people’s own organization and others).

Scouts have issues with where Beckham will ultimately fit defensively. He’s an average-at-best runner who falls just short of big-league range, and he’ll likely need to move to second base by the time he’s ready, although that opinion is hardly universally held.

Poreda will be given a serious look in spring training, but current plans are for him to begin the year at Triple-A Charlotte. He should make his big-league debut at some point during the ’09 season.

Viciedo was often out of shape while playing in Cuba, and he had ballooned to somewhere in the neighborhood of 250 pounds at the time of his signing. He’s on a conditioning program this winter, and it will likely be something that requires constant attention; it could eventually move him off of third base. Scouts who saw him in Cuba noted that beyond the weight issues, he had a fondness for his cruise-control setting.

The Good: Danks certainly passes all of the scouting sniff tests as a tall, rangy athlete who oozes with projection. He works the count well and shows occasional pull power. Defensively, he’s nearly big-league ready in center field right now, with plus instincts, outstanding range, and an above-average arm.
The Bad: Danks’ longish, line-drive swing does not produce much power, prompting an interesting comment from one Arizona Fall League observer: “Didn’t the White Sox already have the big-time athlete who can’t hit for power? I already saw the Ryan Sweeney show, and I’m not really up for an encore.”

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 12:54 PM CST reply actions  

i really hope i'm there for poreda's debut

that’d be pretty cool

I think Bull Durham was overrated.

by U-God on Feb 2, 2009 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Boy, are you taking a page from colin's

SSS workbook? Something about all-time Sox SP’s…?

I would rather douse a newspaper in gasoline, wrap it around my penis and light it on fire then relive that experience
by armedpp on Aug 29, 2007 2:36 AM EDT

by winningugly on Feb 2, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

i've just gotten very lazy with school starting

no real excuses. should have some time this afternoon.

I think Bull Durham was overrated.

by U-God on Feb 2, 2009 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

If Ryan Sweeney could play a plus CF, I'd be happy with his .733 OPS there...

If Danks does that — posts a .350 OBP and plus defense in CF — at the major league level then it’s an excellent pick. And if he has the speed to steal 20 bases a year and shut up people with a SB leadoff fetish complaining the Sox lack a leadoff hitter for a couple of years I’ll be grateful.

by hitlesswonder on Feb 2, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions  

ah yes, the old "he's on cruise control"

Remember kids, make sure to never play on “cruise control”, even when you’re one of the most sought after players in the world.

Seriously that kind of thing is what I can’t stand about these reports. WTF dose that even mean. He doesn’t show emotion? He doesn’t run to first hard? If those are issues (and IMO the former isn’t even an issue) than just say that.

If he hit 320/400/550 during the week the scout saw him on “cruise control” but it looked like he might have lollygagged on a infield popup and over ran it at the end — does that mean he’s not a good player? Is that even worth mentioning?

by madvillian on Feb 2, 2009 2:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree, but the scout should just say that and provide examples right

I mean, look, maybe he really was lazy and disinterested and the scout saw concrete examples (like not running to 1st hard, lollygagging on a popup) and just didn’t bother to say that when he spoke to the BP rep.

So I’m just much ado about nothing here. But it sure would be nice if the BP folks could clarify what the scout meant (like press him in the conversation) when he said “he plays on cruise control”.

Because that phrase means nothing in and of itself.

by madvillian on Feb 2, 2009 2:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I guess if he hit 320/400/550

that would be worth discussing . . . but guys who put up mediocre numbers in the equivalent of less than AA ball and get that tag . . . that is a different discussion and should warrant some concern.

by jc2313 on Feb 2, 2009 2:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Not enough, it seems -

A MLB 4 year contract is pretty good for someone whi is “disinterested” and/or “lazy”.

I’ll go by the assessment of the folks who signed him and give them the benefit for now.

I would rather douse a newspaper in gasoline, wrap it around my penis and light it on fire then relive that experience
by armedpp on Aug 29, 2007 2:36 AM EDT

by winningugly on Feb 2, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

So, because he signed a contract

all concerns go away? I will trust the word of scouts that actually saw him play as well. However, that does not mean the Sox don’t feel that they can handle those issues. Obviously, they do and I am not stating they can’t or that it was a bad signing. But, there are concerns and/or issues. He is clearly talented, just a high risk/high reward type of signing, and I think it certainly helps to have Ramirez and Contreras on the roster.

by jc2313 on Feb 2, 2009 2:59 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought last year's stats

were fairly mediocre? I know he had a real good 2005-2006, but I thought 07-08 was average?

by jc2313 on Feb 2, 2009 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

deric mckamey's top fifteen

1. beckham
2. poreda
3. flowers
4. viciedo
5. danks
6. j. martinez
7. lillibridge
8. getz
9. richard
10. allen
11. ely
12. shelby
13. griffith
14. miranda
15. broadway

overall for baseball, beckham ranked 31, poreda 53, flowers 80, viciedo 86, and danks 88. overall, white sox system ranked 23 with a high ranking for hitting prospects but dead last in pitching.

i’ll post some of his commentary later.

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 1:37 PM CST reply actions  

Wow, Allen at 10

behind martinez, danks and lillibridge. That is quite the stretch. When you get in the 10-15 range, I think you have to start throwing in Carter, Hudson and Upchurch. I realize pitchers that far away are often deemed non-prospects, but I sure would take them over Miranda, Broadway or Griffith at this point.

by jc2313 on Feb 2, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

So the top 5 are basically the same everywhere?

Curious, any Santos Rodriguez.discussion?

"Jenks, who was never afraid to say "no" to a hamburger..."

by BobbySouthSide on Feb 2, 2009 2:26 PM CST up reply actions  

well, not quite.

this guy doesn’t like allen; some don’t like danks. i think there’s consensus on beckham, poreda, viciedo and flowers. some put one or both of the allen and danks in that mix and then say there’s a chasm between that grouping and the rest.

and, no. relievers who repeat rookie ball usually don’t merit discussion.

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks

D*mn, he repeated rookie ball? I thought there was some hoopla with the kid that he might be on the fast track to being a decent reliever?

"Jenks, who was never afraid to say "no" to a hamburger..."

by BobbySouthSide on Feb 2, 2009 2:40 PM CST up reply actions  

according to dante in the other thread, rick hahn loves him.

usually when you see a guy like him in a deal, it means someone in the organization had a hard on for him. rookie ball stats don’t mean much. never read a scouting report on him and never seen him pitch. your guess is currently as good as mine.

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 3:32 PM CST up reply actions  

The top 5 are usually the same, right Bob?

Like any poll, the top 5 of 20-25 that have enough pollsters rating/evaluating, and the information is all out there and been studied to death. Not a lot of secrets left.

I would rather douse a newspaper in gasoline, wrap it around my penis and light it on fire then relive that experience
by armedpp on Aug 29, 2007 2:36 AM EDT

by winningugly on Feb 2, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Couldn't you say 6-15 is a crapshoot?

"Jenks, who was never afraid to say "no" to a hamburger..."

by BobbySouthSide on Feb 2, 2009 2:39 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd imagine there might be a slight differing of opinion on 1-5 on occasion

if a guy values a hitter more than a pitcher (personal preference, perhaps, or maybe he/she thinks the prospect will create a bigger impact because of a bigger percieved need). But I’d think the top guys have been scouted to death.

I would rather douse a newspaper in gasoline, wrap it around my penis and light it on fire then relive that experience
by armedpp on Aug 29, 2007 2:36 AM EDT

by winningugly on Feb 2, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

True,

but as you know, a good amount of the time a lot of the experts are wrong (Joe Borchard and Brian Anderson come quickly to mind). Of all the publications and minor league talent evaluators, who should I put my money on being most accurate when it comes to ranking an organization’s prospects?

"Jenks, who was never afraid to say "no" to a hamburger..."

by BobbySouthSide on Feb 2, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions  

rankings are not all that meaningful.

read what is said about a player. as for whom to trust, don’t trust any single source. you can tell my bias from who i post – i stick with goldstein, sickels, and mckamey. i think baseball america is junk for the white sox because phil rogers is heavily involved. i think keith law is a dick and i don’t waste my money on espn insider so i ignore him generally. each of these have a somewhat different philosophy in evaluation. as you note, you’re going to find consensus 80% of the time on who the top players are. you should pay attention when there is some difference regarding that other 20%. and, after those top guys, it’s interesting to see who each ranks simply because you’ll get discussion of a lot more players that way.

as for “wrong”, i’m not sure that’s necessarily the best way to think about it. for example, goldstein, as you may know, uses a good/bad and so on structure. not everyone is going to pan out. and you’ll know what the risk is if you read the ‘bad’ part. again, reading the information is the important part. a guy who is ranked, say, a B by sickels could be a guy who is a safe bet to be a solid player or could be a high risk/high reward type. and you won’t know the difference if you just look at the ranking.

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the information - very helpful!

"Jenks, who was never afraid to say "no" to a hamburger..."

by BobbySouthSide on Feb 2, 2009 3:30 PM CST up reply actions  

It kind of reminds me

of hearing Roger Ebert say how he hated originally assigning stars to his movie reviews, but the newspapers insisted that he do so. It’s a good device to get a very quick snapshot, and it’s obviously something casual movie-goers (and advertisers) love. But it isn’t something for the serious fan. Same with these reports.

I’m intrigued by Allen, and I found some additional information here:

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2008/9/17/615756/white-sox-prospect-brandon

If nothing else, it demonstrates the fluid nature of these ratings.

by palehose67 on Feb 2, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Is the backup job his to lose at this point?

Anyone know if there was discussion about that over the weekend? I have a hard time believing they are willing to go with Corky Miller.

by jc2313 on Feb 2, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

KW said it in that briefing a while back

it was Miller or Stewart. Armstrong is lefthanded and has been raking of late. Give him AAA and Miller can take the occasional lefty from AJ.

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Feb 2, 2009 5:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Did not hear that

I imagine AJ must be thrilled. He might start 159 games this year!

by jc2313 on Feb 2, 2009 7:12 PM CST reply actions  

durability is AJ's best skill right now

might as well make the most of it.

Sober, I was appalled at the women. Drunk I was told I danced with them all.

by colintj on Feb 2, 2009 7:35 PM CST up reply actions  

But I think I pointed this out earlier…because they’re doing mathematical projections and seeing a kid they think is 17 playing in rookie ball, their projections might be skewed a lot more because they’re projecting mathematically based on that number, while someone with actual scouts eyes on the kid might think something completely different. Therefore, they might be particularly vulnerable to the type of manipulation that has been suggested to have occurred with these kids.

http://www.soxtalk.com/forums/index.php?s=&showtopic=69695&view=findpost&p=1829597

jesus christ. and these are the people who are administrators?

by larry on Feb 2, 2009 8:30 PM CST reply actions  

Backlash against sabermetricians, just like Wall Street bankers.

Saw on SI.com or espn.com somewhere last night referencing Joe Torre’s book, and the shots he took against cashman that Brian Cashman. Blogger’s assertion included Cashman is “overreliant on sabermetrics”, which is deemed a weakness. Now that everything new is toast and everything old is coming back in vogue (family, warm fires, reading, poverty) expect the “new” guard to be challenged.

I would rather douse a newspaper in gasoline, wrap it around my penis and light it on fire then relive that experience
by armedpp on Aug 29, 2007 2:36 AM EDT

by winningugly on Feb 3, 2009 8:15 AM CST up reply actions  

well, sure.

but my point was more 1) goldstein doesn’t use “mathematical projections” and 2) whether anyone uses mathematical projections or not is quite irrelevant because anyone, whether they’re using maths or “actual scout eyes” (where can i get a pair of those?), will consider age important when evaluating.

by larry on Feb 3, 2009 9:05 AM CST up reply actions  

I got your point (though sounded like an idiot in my post).

I offered another means of rendering the quote ridiculous. We differ in how the quote is ridiculous, is all.

I would rather douse a newspaper in gasoline, wrap it around my penis and light it on fire then relive that experience
by armedpp on Aug 29, 2007 2:36 AM EDT

by winningugly on Feb 3, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions  

Prospects Could Be Late-Round Steals
Jon Link, rhp, White Sox: The Padres drafted Link in 2005 in the 26th round out of Bluefield (Va.) College, but Link left the organization in 2007 when the White Sox traded Rob Mackowiak to the Padres to acquire Link at the trading deadline. Link, 24, was excellent last season for Double-A Birmingham, finishing with a 3.02 ERA in 56 2/3 innings as the Barons’ closer. Link struck out 66 batters, averaging 10.5 strikeouts per nine innings. Link throws three pitches for strikes: a 90-92 mph fastball with some sink, a slider and a changeup. Link goes to his above-average slider for strikeouts, but his changeup is more than a show-me pitch and is an effective third weapon. There was some talk of moving Link to the starting rotation because of his three-pitch mix, but the White Sox will leave him in the bullpen. He still has to learn to harness his control, as he walked 27 batters (4.3 per nine) last year, though he was better in 2007 in high Class A when he walked just 15 batters in 58 2/3 innings (2.3 per nine).

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=2159

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Feb 3, 2009 2:30 PM CST reply actions  

deric mckamey tidbits

so we can feel better about posting copyrighted material, go buy his book: http://www.baseballhq.com/books/mlba.shtml

marquez, potential is #4 starter; athletic pitcher with quick arm action that elicits movement to sinker and ability to change speeds. throws strikes but doesn’t miss many bats and was victimized by home runs. averaged slightly more than five innings per start, so needs to build stamina.

allen, potential is starting 1b; muscular hitter with good bat speed and power to all fields. BA could suffer due to poor pitch recognition, propensity to strike out, and his struggles against LH pitching. runs bases well despite below average speed and is a solid defender with arm strength and soft hands.

armstrong, potential is platoon catcher; strong/muscular catcher with solid bat speed and moderate power. tends to get pull-conscious and lacks plate discipline, so BA/OBP may always be on low side. below average speed/agility are problems, but has average catch-and-throw skills in halting running game (36% CS%).

lillibridge, potential is starting SS; wiry athlete with ability to put the bat on the ball, but lacks the bat speed to hit for power. will need to exercise more patience at the plate to improve OBP. has speed to produce steals and is an above average defender with arm strength and range, but lacks instincts.

nunez, potential is setup reliever/closer; tall/athletic pitcher moved to relief and improved base skills in nearly every category. quick arm action from a low 3/4 slot gives movement and velocity to FB and SL, which allows him to miss bats and generate ground balls. CU used infrequently and needs to build stamina.

by larry on Feb 3, 2009 2:35 PM CST reply actions  

some more tidbits.
flowers, tall/strong catcher with the bat speed and strength to hit for power. makes solid contact and discerns balls and strikes, which should keep BA respectable. shows arm strength behind the plate, but lacks receiving skills, agility, and the ability to halt the running game (27% CS%)

jon gilmore, potential power hitter with bat speed and a short stroke, but was done-in by poor plate discipline and being overly aggressive. speed/range are slightly below average which made move from 2b to 3b a necessity, and has the arm strength, but his bat will have to play-up to justify the move.

dan hudson, tall/projectable hurler with average repertoire, but commands plate and gets above average movement. pitches off FB, using SL for strikeouts, but does not have the CU to combat LH batters and will alter slot to deliver CB. low 3/4 slot makes him deceptive to RH batters.

by larry on Feb 6, 2009 4:09 PM CST up reply actions  

The 32nd Team: Even more prospect scouting reports
Starting in 2003, it has been an annual tradition here at BaseballAmerica.com to present what we like to call The 31st Team, a collection of all the scouting reports that are written for but don’t quite make it into the Prospect Handbook. Trades can cause reshuffling, and sometimes we just change our minds and revise our lists.

This year, as a premium for those who buy the Handbook directly from us, we included a No. 31 prospect to accompany the Top 30 lists we put together for every team. Eighteen of those 30 players were pulled off the cutting-room floor, and we created 12 new reports to complete that project.

So that’s what has become of The 31st Team, which no longer will exist as an BA.com feature. But don’t despair! We still have more bonus material to offer. There are still 17 extra reports that didn’t make it into the Handbook or the premium, so we present the first edition of . . . The 32nd Team.

Nine of the 17 members are White Sox farmhands. Phil Rogers, who wrote the White Sox Top 30, provided us with a few extra reports in case GM Kenny Williams had his typical offseason of trading prospects for veterans. Williams instead went in the other direction, dealing Nick Swisher and Javier Vazquez for six youngsters who pushed players off the original Top 30.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/column/2009/267491.html

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Feb 3, 2009 2:40 PM CST reply actions  

Clayton Richard, lhp, White Sox: If you throw enough strikes and keep hitters off balance with your pitch sequencing, you can have success at the minor league level. Whether Richard can replicate his minor league success into steady big league production remains to be seen. An eighth-round pick out of Michigan in 2005 who turned 25 in September, the 6-foot-5, 240-pound Richard is a physical pitcher without power stuff. His fastball velocity is average, though the sink on the pitch helps keep the ball on the ground. His changeup is his go-to secondary pitch, but his offspeed stuff is generally fringy. There are a lot of fungible fifth-starter types around the league that Richard will try to differentiate himself from, but by already reaching the big leagues, he’s made it farther than most eighth-round picks

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=2256

by larry on Feb 6, 2009 9:29 AM CST reply actions  

initial thoughts from reading sickels' book

both carter and hudson are listed as sleepers. he can’t figure out what the big deal with marquez could be either. called poreda one of the best lefty prospects in the game, noting that his command and control exceeded expectations last season. doesn’t think richard can make it as a starter but sees him as being more than a loogy. and for those who still follow the nevin griffith bandwagon, he says july is the projected return.

also, he discussed someone named “kenny williams jr.” – does anyone know if he’s related to the white sox general manager?

our schtick is old

by larry on Feb 9, 2009 8:07 PM CST reply actions  

more than a loogy means

something like easy heat right?

and thanks again for all the book postings

But Frank Thomas was always his own guy, he always lived by some sort of code that wasn’t especially clear to anyone but him.

by U-God on Feb 9, 2009 8:17 PM CST up reply actions  

that's what i meant

i was just using easy heat as a comparison. hoping richard turns out that good, not banking on it

But Frank Thomas was always his own guy, he always lived by some sort of code that wasn’t especially clear to anyone but him.

by U-God on Feb 9, 2009 8:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I think he might have Ron Villone's ceiling.

EVERYBODY PICK US FOR 3RD OR 4TH SO I DINK WE DOIN POOTY GOO
Sox Machine

by Sox Machine on Feb 9, 2009 11:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Interesting comp

as I could definitely seem him having a Ron Villone type career. However, I think his ceiling is higher than that . . . #3,#4 type starter.

by jc2313 on Feb 10, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought he was related

to Ken Williams of the St Louis Browns?

Anyway, nice to see Hudson listed, I think has become a little lost in the shuffle with many prospect rankings.

by jc2313 on Feb 10, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to South Side Sox! Please check our new standards and guide to FanPosts/FanShots before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: Counting of the heads (Meet-up 2012)
Avatarsing_small
2012 White Sox PECOTA
Archerme_small
RRRR: Oscars, wild.
Mrsparkleorig_small
Calling all new readers and lurkers: Open thread on Feb. 6
61y5zkwuutl__sl500__small
High and Tight on the Mendoza Line

Recent FanPosts

Rudylaw_small
Hitting Instruction
Small
Oswalt?
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: Dental dams and other reasons to kill people
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: HSALTP! SL. SLTP!
Small
My optimistically pessimistic 2012 White Sox Outlook

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

22 New Baseball Books Reviewed

Recent FanShots

Bill James: Open Letter To The Hall Of Fame
Keith Law says our minor league system sucks - hard.
Boom Goes the Dynamically Priced Tickets!
Does Mark Parent regret leaving the Reading Phillies? Because, man, if I'd known this was coming...
pete rose movie streaming on netflix: 4192, crowning of the hit king
AL Central at Detroit Tigers, Game 1
Win a Bill Melton jersey!
White Sox Sign Scott Olsen: MLB Rumors - MLBTradeRumors.com
Ventura participates in Blackhawks "Shoot the Puck" contest

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managing Editor

Mrsparkleorig_small Jim Margalus

Editors

Deadhorse_small larry

Sealab_murphy_small colintj

Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small homesickalien

Omar_small U-God

Authors

10083hb_small KenWo4LiFe

Archerme_small Teahenny Penny