Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ray Allen Fighting Age, Injury And His New Role

Another great service beat writers provide fans is humanizing the players, telling us about their personalities and their backstories. They make the players more than simply numbers on the field.

Could bloggers provide the same information if given proper access? Yes, certainly. But the more important question is whether they could afford the financial demands of daily access. It would be challenging enough for bloggers just to carve out the necessary eight-hour time slot to use that access at home games. Could they also pay the staggering lodging, travel and food expenses for 81 road games plus spring training?

about 3 years ago Thecheatsmoking_tiny The Cheat 39 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from South Side Sox

Juan Pierre: In Memoriam

Nov 2011 by larry - 84 comments

Lisa Dergan: In Memoriam

Jan 2010 by larry - 114 comments

Photo of the Day

Sep 2009 by larry - 133 comments

Meeting of the Minds

May 2009 by The Cheat - 181 comments

Mike MacDougal: In Memoriam

Apr 2009 by larry - 130 comments

Around SB Nation

On Snark

Jul 2009 from On the Banks - 1 comment

Comments

Display:

Are we?

I have more fun following baseball now than at any point im my life. I’ll go buy a magazine or book if I want something more in-depth than is provided through The Tubes.

And, as some of you have occasionally pointed out, I ain’t no little kid.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 26, 2009 12:25 PM CDT reply actions  

You mean, who do we (you are the lead - see your response to Gonzo yesterday) make fun of 15 x/day?

We’d survive. All the damn "Twitter"ing and such might fill whatever information gaps there are. You’d have a lot more stringers out there sending information to the dispatch office. Verification would be an issue, but so be it.

It’ll work. There will be disruption, but new relationships will evolve to replace the old ones if the information is highly sought (which it is).

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 26, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed, we're parasites on the beat writers content

If our 4 beats (Trib, S-T, Herald, and MLB.com) disappeared this site as we know it would die as well; or it would have to prove it could survive on its own…

If I knew I could get access, which isn’t something I crave or am even actively seeking, I would attempt to raise capital to make a go of it as a new type of beat writer for a year, online only obviously.

I can’t say for sure even what I’d do different… some thoughts.

  • I’d kill the inverted pyramid game story.
  • There would be no space limit, obviously
  • I’d develop a monthly SI-type (5,000 words) type piece
  • I’d skip many of the road trips (cost savings) Are quotes really necessary for a recap? Most of the time, no.
  • I’d add a couple of trips to visit the minor leagues, gathering video, scouting reports and personal pieces on minor leaguers of interest

The overall idea would be to leverage the ease of publishing online, the unlimited space, to provide a deeper coverage to the fans.

I don’t follow every team, and hardly pay attention to the non-chicago NL clubs, so I can’t say for sure that nobody has stepped up their coverage in this way (or others that I haven’t thought of/listed above), but I have yet to see it, Ringolsby included.

As important as the more in-depth coverage would be a rethinking of the way the content is delivered. An attractive, user friendly portal is essential.

And maybe most important would be the advertising. I’ve recently begun to think that the most effective ad style is the Hulu or Salon model. Obviously, large sites like Yahoo can’t get away with interstitial video, but if you’re offering the type of coverage I’m proposing (or even just your standard newspaper fare) I think it’s the best model.

You’d obviously still have the regular CPM ads on the site, embedded within and next to your content, but there would be a once-a-day type ad that you have to watch/sit through to get to your content.

by The Cheat on Mar 26, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

and that's what i wonder.

would a site that is online only get enough revenue to support a full-time beat writer type? i suspect it’s possible, given the evolution of things, but would there be as many writers covering a team? and, if i’m a current blog, why would i want to expand into beat coverage – why not just let someone else do that stuff for me and i just continue to steal their content? things would obviously have to change in how things are delivered etc. i note that you’re talking about skipping road trips. seems like that would cause the quality of coverage to decline overall. not necessary for recaps, of course, to have quotes but lots of shit goes down on 10 day road trips.

by larry on Mar 26, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was just thinking out loud

I actually thought about it this very subject while working out this weekend.

I don’t want to expand into beat coverage. I don’t like that stuff, and I’d probably want to kill myself if I had to churn some of that stuff out.

But what I was was thinking about the other day was the type of coverage offered and the way that coverage is provided and the way it probably should be… And I can’t picture newspapers being the ones to break the mold…

Somebody has to do it right, demonstrate proof of concept, until we get it from newspapers. That was my little thinking outloud exercise, which you quickly found holes in. I’m not sure what it would cost, what the revenues would be…

And truth is, you shouldn’t do your proof-of-concept with any other franchise than the Cubs, Red Sox or Yankees. Red Sox might be the best, since the Globe is one of the oft-speculated victims, and the Yankees have like 18 beat guys.

by The Cheat on Mar 26, 2009 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

which is also why I said "i'd raise capital"

Somebody, not necessarily me, has to do a one-season experiment to prove it’ll work

by The Cheat on Mar 26, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

There's no offense taken

I’m not deluded enough to think that I have the answer. I think as a fan and as a blogger I have better insight than most into what fans want and how to best provide that content, but I still have more questions than answers

by The Cheat on Mar 26, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

That is a great conversation

that I will peruse more intensely at a later time. Thanks.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 26, 2009 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nicely done

EVERYBODY PICK US FOR 3RD OR 4TH SO I DINK WE DOIN POOTY GOO
Sox Machine

by Sox Machine on Mar 26, 2009 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

if the money ever comes and you need a lackey to run around the minors for you

i’m in.

I can lead you to 4 Wisdom, but I can't free your brain from the evil of Punto.

by colintj on Mar 26, 2009 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’ll go buy a magazine or book if I want something more in-depth than is provided through The Tubes.

does BP/THT/BTB/FanGraphs/Sickels publish a daily paper and I don’t know it?

The greatest trick the White Sox ever pulled was convincing their fan base that "Ozzieball" ever existed.

by The Wizard on Mar 26, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

My point was perhaps a daily print publication is unnecessary.

And you guys are catastrophizing. Why reinvent the wheel? Why would Cheat need to be “the guy” to do it all? Why not employ stringers in various cities who love, love, love the Sox (you can take indications of interest from folks and have them submit pieces in order to evaluate talent).

Get creative! Fer Chrissakes, the old way of doing business is dead, and it’s because it hasn’t been priced properly AND because much of it is redundant and inane. There’s a reason sportswriters are marginalized as lazy, inefficient, free-loading slobs. You want information? Go get it. And get creative about it. But use the on-line community you’ve built – that is your greatest asset.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 26, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Which would mean you would need tto come up with answers

to the questions you and Cheat have posed. When you answer them to the tune of “here’s how we can make money” I’ll listen. Emphasis on “we”.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 26, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Interstitial ads

You can land on the portal page without having to view something, but to venture inside, it’ll cost you time/eyeballs. The problem being a site like this is too small to generate interest from advertisers, and even when you got them, at our current readership, it wouldn’t be but $20K/yr

When you scale it though, and I’m assuming access increases scale immediately, there’s 6-figure potential very easily, which is why I suggest any experiment start with Sawx or Cubs

by The Cheat on Mar 26, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good idea, though it's a large assumption.

Now come up with a business plan. larry can do one with you, I’m sure, as you are all right brain creative and he is left brain-ruthlessly efficient.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 26, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

so none of us has done any research into the kind of hits that Sox related posts on S-T get?

I can lead you to 4 Wisdom, but I can't free your brain from the evil of Punto.

by colintj on Mar 26, 2009 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

If 13 random people are doing it, then one person may as well be doing it.

 The amount of information those 13 random people will get is virtually zero.

All stringers can do is write the gamer most people seem to think is already past its time.

EVERYBODY PICK US FOR 3RD OR 4TH SO I DINK WE DOIN POOTY GOO
Sox Machine

by Sox Machine on Mar 26, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you have "a port in every storm" stringer

would you not save on overhead costs (travel, time, etc.)? That was my only thought. I do believe the converse of your statement, that one (overpaid, expensive) beat writer can have job divvied up amongst 30 piranhas (who, I’d hope, would be cheaper, hungrier, and more creative).

I don’t know your business – just thinking out loud.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 27, 2009 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

What do you want me to say?

Maybe the locals would work for MLB and every team would be covered by a couple of folks locally. Fer Chrissakes, somehow people manage other people who are not in the same office. My wife is managed out of NYC and somehow makes it work.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 27, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

mlb already does that. you know, scott merkin?

we already have people who question the independence of merkin and the other mlb reporters. doesn’t seem like a good idea to just rely on them.

managing 30 people v. managing one or two is a lot different.

by larry on Mar 27, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, somehow these Merkins came from somewhere,

and if you are going to expect folks to pay for content, either via advertising or subscription, 30 trusted independent contractors (and, yes, there would be a lag time in finding qualified, motivated, talented people to staff – like the local papers that are going BK?) you might expect to do a little more work.

(Lobs it back to The Shark.)

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 27, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

i'll simply incorporate by reference what i've written previously on this topic.

one person doing the job ensures quality, a better depth of knowledge about the team, and relationships with the players/management. some guy walking into the clubhouse to cover the white sox 6 games a year simply isn’t going to do the job well enough. is rick hahn going to talk to this guy? is the pitcher who got shelled going to talk to this guy? you’re in a job where the relationship matters. most jobs where you have to deal with people ain’t much different.

by larry on Mar 27, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's brainstorming. Work with me here.

Not all of us have the philosophical bent/interest to consider such topics with great care. And you don’t dis your potential angel investor.

Sweet, I better start upping the suck.
by homesickalien on Mar 24, 2009 4:52 PM EDT

by winningugly on Mar 27, 2009 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

i will gladly take all investments

But Frank Thomas was always his own guy, he always lived by some sort of code that wasn’t especially clear to anyone but him.

by U-God on Mar 28, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

"Humanizing the players"

I find that kind of funny. It seems like as often as they humanize the players, they also build up these players and hold them to (ridiculous) standards only to tear them down when they make a mistake (the whole steroids era being a prime example).

Thinking about it further, I’d imagine that the ‘humanizing’ pieces/stories take place much more often but because those aren’t anything out of the ordinary, I don’t make much of it. But when I see one of those “CRUCIFY HIM!” pieces from a writer who sat back said diddly-squat during the 90s (sticking with the steroids example), it tends to land on my radar.

by CWSKeith on Mar 26, 2009 4:15 PM CDT reply actions  

hasn't deadspin made a killing off the fact that the newsfolk have let so many

“human interest” stories slip through the cracks?

I can lead you to 4 Wisdom, but I can't free your brain from the evil of Punto.

by colintj on Mar 26, 2009 6:03 PM CDT reply actions  

also, isn't beat reporting for the young?

it’s rigorous and low paying. or probably should be.

I can lead you to 4 Wisdom, but I can't free your brain from the evil of Punto.

by colintj on Mar 26, 2009 6:21 PM CDT reply actions  

The new Washington Post reporter covering the Nationals baseball team would rather be writing about something else. Food, preferably.

"I don’t like sports—I am embarrassed that I cover them," Chico Harlan says. "I can’t wait to stop. It is a means to an end and a paycheck."

http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/people/capitalcomment/11866.html

by larry on Mar 28, 2009 10:03 AM CDT reply actions  

Interesting

I can see the up and downsides.

Alexander Hamilton shot Alexander Hamilton...

by Hazymania on Mar 28, 2009 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to South Side Sox! Please check our new standards and guide to FanPosts/FanShots before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Pair-rose-colored__szo0279_small
A Quarter for your thoughts?
Homersimpson_small
BMO 2027: The Sox Machine Cometh
Img_2130_small
RRRR: Lemon drops melting
Deadhorse_small
White Sox Minor League Update
Hippeavy5711_small
Condor Sounds

Recent FanPosts

Small
Reliever-to-Starter Conversions Update
Small
Is Nate Jones for Real?*
Pair-rose-colored__szo0279_small
CDM Challenge Update (Second Tier Status 1/5 in)
Small
30-team dynasty league-White Sox Available
Img_2130_small
An old RRRR

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Angry Condor: The Chris Sale Saga (beautiful work by SSE).

Recent FanShots

White Sox offer free tickets to CPD officers
Empty Seats
A true hitting guru can fix anything
Tweet from Jake Peavy
The White Sox's Black Hole Problem, And Other Observations From A Day Game
Get to the choppa!
Dan Rubenstein heads to Columbus, Ohio to meet Hall of Fame legends Ricky Henderson, Frank Thomas,...
Sox Are Shiftless MFers!
Jake Peavy, AL Pitcher of the Month for the April, is back to 2007 form. While outperforming his preseason projections, is he really up there with the best in baseball? Short answer: yes.

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
A 2 part podcast with Oney Guillen (Ozzie's Son)

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managing Editor

Tedlangue_small Jim Margalus

Editors

Deadhorse_small larry

Sealab_murphy_small colintj

Img_2130_small homesickalien

Omar_small U-God

Authors

10083hb_small KenWo4LiFe

Archerme_small Uribe Down