Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: My First Fight: Diego Sanchez

I voted this week in the Minor League Update poll that Aaron Poreda would be a reliever, specifically a closer. I go back and forth on whether he's a starter or reliever but more often recently I've settled on a reliever.

I've not been on the "Clayton Richard is horsedung" one week and "Clayton Richard is awesome" another week ride that others have. He's probably a #4 starter.

I consider Adam Russell largely useless. Basically Masset.

Dexter Carter currently projects as a reliever. If he managed to develop a changeup, he could end up being a #3 / 4 type starter but his fastball is probably average-ish and his curve can be plus but is inconsistent due to his mechanics. Could all this get sorted out? Sure. But he's a long way from the majors.

And, since all of these guys are pitchers, there's the attendant increased injury risk over a position player.

So, the White Sox acquire a frontline starter under control for 3-4 more years for a bunch of guys who may not be much more than relievers or backend rotation types. Sounds good, right? Well, the potential problem with the deal is that Peavy's contract isn't good. By no means is it bad but it's not like he's being grossly underpaid. He makes $15M, $16M, $17M, and $22M ($4M buyout) over the next four years. His salary is quite reasonable this year but the Sox are going to be paying him for at least one month of touring North Carolina and training rooms and i'd say it's debatable what the Sox will be getting out of him after he returns from injury.

Essentially, the Sox traded for a guy being paid about what he'll be worth going forward and gave up some cheap parts who, no matter what their blemishes, are very likely will be providing some significant surplus value to the Padres going forward.

I don't hate the deal - and if Peavy comes back strong to close out this season I'd hate it less - but this isn't a slam dunk for the Sox, either. Kenny Williams is gambling again and we'll see how he does this time.

over 2 years ago Deadhorse_tiny larry 77 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good analysis as always Larry

One thing I think this trade does greatly simplify things going forward — like you said, the Sox basically traded a bunch of unknown quantities for one sure quantity. Now they have the rotation for 2010-2012 set. They can focus their attention on other areas.

There is something to be said for risk and risk management as well though. It’s almost like someone said, “I’ll give a guaranteed 5% yield and you give me your more volatile investment”

We’ll see if the surer thing turns out to be the higher yield investment here.

by madvillian on Jul 31, 2009 5:43 PM CDT reply actions  

well, peavy still isn't a sure quantity

as evidenced by this season. the sox are great at keeping guys healthy so they’re probably thinking they can do the same with peavy. but you get a season where peavy is out for half the year again and you’re blowing $9M or something on nada and that probably consumes most/all of any surplus value peavy has. another thing is that the “headliners” in this deal for the white sox aren’t exactly far from the big leagues so you’re not necessarily discounting the future for present (not to mention peavy’s current status). richard is a contributor now. poreda could be a contributor now and certainly next year. russell is shit so who cares either way. carter obviously is the potential huge upside for the friars but…eh. it will be interesting to see how it plays out. i don’t view any of the prospects as being sure things at this point so that certainly softens the blow.

White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry

by larry on Jul 31, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

RE: the health angle

That’s the organization’s MO with the starters. For the most part they’ve been successful with it.

Anyways, well said, again.

by madvillian on Jul 31, 2009 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty much with you.

My initial and later more analytical reactions are both neutral. I hope it works out.

by dantesox on Aug 1, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is a high risk/high reward deal.

The high risks are numerous – money, parl/leagueperfomance translation/prospect undervaluation. The reward is also potentially high -a former Cy who pitches like it under contract for 3-4 years. Rolling the dice is KW. We know how much he values prospects – trading chits (except when you’ve got a diamond like Becks), so this is consistent for him.

We’ll see. In the meanwhile, he’s back on the front page, having not only aced out the AL Central, but the crosstown boobs, too. Good work.

We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT

by winningugly on Jul 31, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

just saw his interview on mlb network

If he had any kind of foresight at all he would have known the Padres werent good, wouldnt have hurt his ankle for us, and maybe the Sox are in 1st place.

just saying.

The president was drinking Bud Light, Biden was drinking Buckler (a nonalcoholic beer), Gates was drinking Samuel Adams Light and Crowley was drinking Blue Moon.

by e-gus on Jul 31, 2009 5:53 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't hate the deal, but.........

Way to step out there big guy. Still waiting for wind direction?

Sox win, cubs lose.....what a wonderful world!

by picktoclick on Jul 31, 2009 5:56 PM CDT reply actions  

it's a fine deal.

one doesn’t have to hate or love a deal. there’s plenty in the middle.

White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry

by larry on Jul 31, 2009 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

But Rachel's quiet, reasoned intelligence draws more than Beck.

The lesson is that there’s room for thought out even-handedness… Or tha Larry should turn lesbian.

"Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand."

— Leo Durocher

by Chiburb on Jul 31, 2009 6:11 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Rachel. Please.

A man with a soft voice. And cute eyes.

We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT

by winningugly on Jul 31, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

You've never heard of them?

You’ll never write for a real blog.

"wordy and overly verbose."
by larry on Jul 3, 2009 3:43 PM CDT

by Black Sox Baseball on Jul 31, 2009 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

let me know when any of them win a CY YOUGN AWARD.

pEAVY IS THE greateest

White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry

by larry on Jul 31, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

The "rape" part is totally and literally accurate, though.

KW will have to hope that the Padres are too ashamed to go to the police.

by Dongfang Hong on Jul 31, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good analysis tells you the factors at play, and explains how they'll combine going forward.

Bad analysis declares an opinion and then justifies it. I’m not a big fan of criticizing analysis for “not stepping out there,” especially if the point of the argument was that the trade was a gamble that can’t really be declared great or terrible yet.

by Dongfang Hong on Jul 31, 2009 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with that whole-heartedly

Unless the “analyst” is a blow-hard with a superiority complex that enjoys ripping everyone else’s opinion but is afraid to offer one.

Sox win, cubs lose.....what a wonderful world!

by picktoclick on Jul 31, 2009 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

someon? wtf?

Sox win, cubs lose.....what a wonderful world!

by picktoclick on Jul 31, 2009 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dude you totally pwned him

larry must be a Cuban, so fucking stupid.

The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.

by Ozzie Montana on Jul 31, 2009 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol.

you know, if you’re going to rip on another poster’s spelling, you may want to check your own. especially when it’s in the same thread.

White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry

by larry on Jul 31, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

nah, u-god is on that

Sox win, cubs lose.....what a wonderful world!

by picktoclick on Jul 31, 2009 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

the biggest problem here is definitely

Peavy’s health vs. the size of the contract.

THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY

by colintj on Jul 31, 2009 5:58 PM CDT reply actions  

His injury is an ankle

It’s not like he’s coming back from Tommy John surgery or what Count had

by Duck99 on Jul 31, 2009 6:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a tendon in his ankle. Not exactly a splintered finger.

I understand you’re saying the injury isn’t terrible, but it’s bad enough to be cause for concern. I’d hate to see him re-injure it after what larry just said about money and down time.

"wordy and overly verbose."
by larry on Jul 3, 2009 3:43 PM CDT

by Black Sox Baseball on Jul 31, 2009 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

He’s had elbow issues in the past, and his mechanics put him at higher risk for future elbow/shoulder problems.

But it’s nice to add a pitcher who, when healthy, will provide 4-5 WAR over the course of a season. Surplus value is nice, but so are more wins when you are paying fair for them just what they’re worth

by 3E8 on Aug 1, 2009 2:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Count me as seeing it Kenny's way.

Peavy actually has a side session tomorrow, and could be rehabbing in 2 weeks. While the future is the real deal, I think there will be benefit to this team by late August.

"Baseball is like church. Many attend, few understand."

— Leo Durocher

by Chiburb on Jul 31, 2009 6:06 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

it all comes back to Massett

with larry

"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jul 31, 2009 6:14 PM CDT reply actions  

also, can not be created or destroyed

"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick

by Where Triples Go to Die on Jul 31, 2009 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

as one approaches the speed of light, one acquires infinite masset

These events have me frightened and on the verge of evacuating my bowels.

by thatshortkid on Jul 31, 2009 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I feel the Padres should give us Richard back

Their fans keep calling him Richards. He deserves better.

by Grinder in Training on Jul 31, 2009 6:19 PM CDT reply actions  

My initial thoughts

Mark, Jake, Gavin and John? God the future looks bright.

I’m a very happy man. Even if he does cost a grip. At least Jerry is showing he’s willing to pay

by Option27 on Jul 31, 2009 6:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Clayton would have had 10 starts from here to finish?

and we get 5 replev and 5 Peavy starts in return? Clayton is about a 5 FIP, replev is 6. So if Peavy gives us a 4 FIP, we break even from a wins perspective.

THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY

by colintj on Jul 31, 2009 6:20 PM CDT reply actions  

not even factoring in the likelihood of skipping the 5th with off days.

someone quoted KW? saying there should only be 3 5th starts til Peavy can go.

by Trooper on Jul 31, 2009 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

well that would be nice.

i could definitely see the Sox going to the pseudo 4 man down the stretch again.

THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY

by colintj on Jul 31, 2009 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

i don't think

Richard is a good fit in SD. He seems to do well exclusively in gun-to-the-head situations…SD is not exactly a pressure cooker.

by Andronicus on Jul 31, 2009 6:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Anyone find Peavy's interleague splits?

Seems they would be appropriate, but my limited internet searching skills can not find them.

fucking dome

by vince_ on Jul 31, 2009 6:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I like

Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity

by OznCoop on Jul 31, 2009 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

woah!

neat.

member of a "solid community of fans" and "a meathead."

by thecip on Jul 31, 2009 6:41 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Since 2006 vs the AL he's:

3.21 ERA/1.23 WHIP/4.1 K/BB in 56IP

and vs the Cubs: 1.88 ERA, 1.13 WHIP

by Andronicus on Jul 31, 2009 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks, Larry.

1. Health.

2. Sox don’t throw big money around regularly. They must like Peavy lots. And their financial projections indicated that it was a go.

But what about F-I-E-L-D-E-R-S?

by ballyb on Jul 31, 2009 6:30 PM CDT reply actions  

The problem wasn't pitching

it’s hitting. We are averaging just over 3 runs a game over the past 12 games. I’m not knocking the Peavy trade, love it, but our offense still sucks. If we make the playoffs you have to really like our chances.

by striker on Jul 31, 2009 6:30 PM CDT reply actions  

ffense is coming - in 2010-2011.

Pitching always keeps us in the game, and it won a WS for us. Tough to argue with that level of success.

We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT

by winningugly on Jul 31, 2009 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

ugh, I don't know

Colon, Contreras, Garcia….

Now we have Jake Peavy, but…WHERE WILL HE PLAY?

by shaftr on Jul 31, 2009 6:43 PM CDT reply actions  

leadoff, duh

These events have me frightened and on the verge of evacuating my bowels.

by thatshortkid on Jul 31, 2009 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

center field?

Sox win, cubs lose.....what a wonderful world!

by picktoclick on Jul 31, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

well,

leadoff and center field are the same position.

by shaftr on Jul 31, 2009 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, I had some time to digest. The reason I was rubbed wrongly was mostly Richard...I recently took a liking to that big-toothed, big-game guy. Also, the want for something NOW is strong within me. :)

But like Chi told me, one team doesn’t have to lose for another to win.
If Peavy is good to go in September, he could very well seal the deal in the Central (assuming we’re still in it); and at least makes our rotation for 2010 and beyond, stellar.

On the other hand, who knows how he’ll pitch fresh off of injury and in a new league.
Definitely a risk, but I am still goddam happy that KW did something.

And more importantly than something, BETTER than the Tigers and Twins.

He is a mad scientist, that KW.

by homesickalien on Jul 31, 2009 7:04 PM CDT reply actions  

What about the fact that Peavy doesn't want to play for the Sox???

Doesn’t that factor in peoples’ analysis that Peavy was hoping to pitch for the Cubs or Dodgers???

by LVSoxFan on Jul 31, 2009 7:33 PM CDT reply actions  

nope

while i’m sure he likes to bat in the NL, i think he knows playing for ozzie and, above all, a winning team, is a no brainer. i really think the sale had to be made primarily to his wife who was not about to leave sunny SD at the drop of a hat.

by Andronicus on Jul 31, 2009 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Peavy is a valuable player

and San Diego deserves to get value in return. I’ve got no problem if Richard or Poreda turn out to be solid mlb pitchers, I wish them well.

I like the trade. Sox have a lot of surplus payroll room next year, and they converted unknown pitching into known pitching at a cost of $$$ which they can afford to spend. Looks like a win/win to me, solid trade.

"It was like everything was slow motion," Wise said. "I stuck my hand out so slowly and was able to make the catch."

by ChicagoPete on Jul 31, 2009 10:12 PM CDT reply actions  

So, it's obviously risky

For it to be a win:
a) Peavy has to stay healthy and pitch well
b) His contract can’t prevent the team from acquiring needed talent elsewhere on the field (the Texas A-Rod syndrome)

I’m hoping that the budget allows the Sox to put some money into the an OF still. I guess we’ll see. I wonder, though, if doesn’t mean both Thome and Dye have to be gone in 2010.

I also, I liked Richard — he definitely changed my mind about his ability to be a major league pitcher. I think he’ll do well in SD.

On the plus side, it’s impressive to see the Sox make a big-league move to win (even it’s in 2010 moreso than 2009). They aren’t selling off, they are trying to build a good team for several years.

As long as the contract doesn’t significantly constrain the budget, I’m OK with the trade. As if anyone cares.

by hitlesswonder on Jul 31, 2009 10:27 PM CDT reply actions  

I like it but...

I love that Kenny has the sack to make these moves. Trading a few prospects and one suspect for a proven winner is typically a good idea. The only think I wonder is what we it look like if we kept these guys and used the $16M in free agency instead. In a way the player(s) we could have signed with the Peavy money needs to be considered as part of this deal. Assuming the Sox don’t add $20 in payroll that opportunity cost is real.

Sarasota Sox Fan

by boot2112 on Jul 31, 2009 10:35 PM CDT reply actions  

The opportunity cost is real either way

Could the Sox have signed Lackey to a 3 year deal at something like $17M or $18M per year instead?

I don’t know…Williams is not an idiot, so they undoubtably considered that. The answer must have been that they thought NYM, NYY, LAA or BOS would offer more years for the premium pitchers and I think they are probably right. The Sox cannot really compete with those teams for the top free agents, especially pitching in that they can’t afford the risk entailed by a big contract that runs 5 years.

by hitlesswonder on Jul 31, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Sox aren't going to sign a pitcher like Peavy as a FA

They’ll never win in a bidding war vs NY or BOS or LA, look at the Torii Hunter nonsense. Plus they’d give up first round draft picks for signing him. A trade like this is the only way they’d pick up a player of this caliber.

"It was like everything was slow motion," Wise said. "I stuck my hand out so slowly and was able to make the catch."

by ChicagoPete on Aug 1, 2009 5:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

that is certainly true

both in terms of annual money and deal length.

White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry

by larry on Aug 1, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

The only "bidding war" they've won in similar contracts

has been with the guys already on the team – PK, MB,etc. Teh Torii, et. al. spurn us.

We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT

by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to South Side Sox! Please check our new standards and guide to FanPosts/FanShots before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jacksoncloseup_small
BMO 2021: When Buehrle closes in on 300/3000
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: Counting of the heads (Meet-up 2012)
Avatarsing_small
2012 White Sox PECOTA
Archerme_small
RRRR: Oscars, wild.
Mrsparkleorig_small
Calling all new readers and lurkers: Open thread on Feb. 6

Recent FanPosts

Rudylaw_small
Hitting Instruction
61y5zkwuutl__sl500__small
High and Tight on the Mendoza Line
Small
Oswalt?
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: Dental dams and other reasons to kill people
Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small
RRRR: HSALTP! SL. SLTP!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

22 New Baseball Books Reviewed

Recent FanShots

White Sox Sign Fukudome
Cespedes to Athletics.
Brooks Boyer Defends 2012 Slogan
2012 Chicago White Sox Consensus Top 36 Prospects
Top 101 Baseball Prospects
Marlins Make Offer to Cespedes
Bill James: Open Letter To The Hall Of Fame
Keith Law says our minor league system sucks - hard.
Boom Goes the Dynamically Priced Tickets!
Does Mark Parent regret leaving the Reading Phillies? Because, man, if I'd known this was coming...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managing Editor

Mrsparkleorig_small Jim Margalus

Editors

Deadhorse_small larry

Sealab_murphy_small colintj

Digital_booklet_-_in_rainbows_01_small homesickalien

Omar_small U-God

Authors

10083hb_small KenWo4LiFe

Archerme_small Teahenny Penny