Peavy Deal Makes White Sox Contenders Beyond '09
It's no secret that I've been openly rooting for the White Sox to do nothing at the trade deadline. There's a simple explanation for that stance. The Sox are competing against not one, but two mediocre opponents in a mediocre division. I covered most of this in my ill-timed The Sox Mum At The Deadline piece. Seriously, I hit publish and literally seconds later I saw the first tweet about Peavy, and had it posted as an update 3 minutes after the original posting time.
A quick summary of my position before the trade: The Sox are a mediocre team which has ably filled holes to keep themselves competitive in a mediocre division. They haven't been able to put .500 out of their rear view mirror and have virtually no shot at the Wild Card. But that being said, they are still in the thick of the division fight, even though they've never hit on all cylinders this season.
That last line is important, because they'll need to stay in that fight without Jake Peavy, who won't even begin a minor league rehab assignment until mid-August and has tentatively targeted the NY/Bos trip at the end of the month for his return to the majors. The Sox will utilize their off-days to rejigger the rotation and minimize their exposure to the 5th starters spot, which they will apparently need only 3 times in the month of August, according to Kenny Williams.
And that's why you won't find me jumping on my internet soapbox to dismantle this trade. I may have openly stated my preference for a stand pat deadline, but more accurately I didn't want them to throw away their future for a less than 50/50 shot at the division title; no prospects for rentals might have been a more accurate motto.
Peavy is anything but a rental. He's signed through 2012 with an option for 2013. This move is more about next year, about 2010 and beyond, than it is about this year, when Peavy is likely to make no more than 7 starts.
About That Contract
We'll ignore 2009. The Sox have obviously decided they can take his contract on. They'll pay a pro-rated portion of his '09 salary. And since the only other trades can be made after passing through waivers, which is pretty rare, it's not likely to affect the Sox decision making for the rest of the season.
- 2010 -- $15M
- 2011 -- $16M
- 2012 -- $17M
- 2013 -- $22M option vs. $4M buyout
Peavy's next three years are at essentially market value. He gave the Padres a home team discount of maybe a $1+M a year, so it's not like the Sox are getting a huge bargain. But what he does give the Sox is 4 very good starting pitchers under control for the next two years, and 3 for the three. (See White Sox Payroll Spreadsheet)
And even though that contract would seem to preclude the White Sox from making some moves in the off-season, the payroll spreadsheet shows them with only about $60M in salary obligations on the books next year. That figure will get bumped to something like $75M when you factor in the major arbitration eligibles (Jenks, Danks, and Quentin) but still leaves plenty of room for them to add pieces (a mercenary CFer, Matt Holliday?) to their offense.
I feel like I'm getting ahead of myself here. But the fact that Peavy won't even be available until the end of the month should tell you where the focus of this deal lies. I wanted the Sox to focus on the future, and that's exactly what they did. I can't complain in the slightest.
* * * * *
There was a game Friday too. It was pretty fun to watch (after the first inning). That is my recap.
Monthly social media links: Become a fan on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter @SouthSideCheat, @SouthSidelarry
0 recs |
230 comments
|
Comments
It's too bad it didn't happen in May
but chances are that without the injury to Peavy, he doesn’t waive his no trade.
I think Cameron would be a good guy to sign in the Offseason, until Danks is ready.
The 7th inning today was a blast, can you believe that this team has stolen home Twice?
by shaftr on Jul 31, 2009 11:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
and Getz involved both times
One catch (and 1 hit) does not make you a major league player... or does it?
by Brush Back on Jul 31, 2009 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i love him as a baserunner
I just hope he can be a .350+ OBP guy along with it.
by shaftr on Jul 31, 2009 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was a pretty nice day.
1. Sox on TV up here in East Dakota.
2. Game was awesome.
3. Sox made probably-good trade.
by Dongfang Hong on Jul 31, 2009 11:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Very well written
This makes the White Sox the favorites in the Central for the next couple years.
You can argue it’s the best rotation in baseball once he returns.
by Option27 on Jul 31, 2009 11:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
best playoff rotation yeah
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 12:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I made my long post in larry's thread instead of waiting for this one
But to sum up: it’s risky (Peavy needs to be good and the contract can’t be crippling). But it’s awesome to see the Sox attempt to build a very good team instead of accepting mediocrity or rebuilding.
The more I think about it, the more I like. Honestly, the Sox wouldn’t get a pitcher of Peavy’s caliber for 3 years (+4M buyout) in the free agent market. So, this was a rare opportunity, even if Peavy isn’t great in the Cell/central (as long as he’s good).
If Cheat is right and there is money to fill the OF and DH holes, it’s a very good gamble.
by hitlesswonder on Jul 31, 2009 11:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The latter point on peavy is key
the only other way to get a pitcher of his caliber is to develop one from within. I think it’s safe to say the Sox don’t see any of the pitchers they traded reaching those heights, certainly not in the lifetime of peavy’s current contract
Twitter: @SouthSideCheat
SouthSideSox on Facebook
by The Cheat on Aug 1, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is exactly the point that made me turn the corner on liking this deal.
Even though first glance suggests that the haul was “too big”, realistically the odds of more than one of those pitchers being a solid, contributing major leaguer were long, and the odds of any of them being as good a pitcher as Peavy were much longer. So long as the money doesn’t prevent them from doing things they need to do, this move was a good one, and I retract my initial dislike of it.
Ed Farmer: "Is it raining in here?"
Steve Stone: "I've made an egregious mistake."
by RWShow on Aug 1, 2009 3:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coming into the series I wanted a split
after tonight, though, it’s tough to not get a little greedy and ask for three of four, especially with Danks and Buehrle (albeit against Burnett and Sabathia) taking the mound for the next two.
Agreed with hitless, too. There is a good amount of risk with Peavy, but Kenny is one clever off-season away from building a team that’s on-par with the three behemoths in the East. They’ve got some real tough yet interesting problems ahead — bring back Contreras on a one year deal, push Hudson or go another route? Deal or keep Jenks? Dye and Thome? CF and 2B? It’s comforting to know that the Sox — even with the Peavy acquisition — appear to be in a good financial spot heading into the winter, especially if prices for the second-tier of talent stays (somewhat) suppressed.
by CWSKeith on Aug 1, 2009 12:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea of Hudson to replace Jenks
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't
they should give him every opportunity to be a starting pitcher. They have the resources to not have to do something like that. And besides, they still have Jenks.
by Daniel Berlyn on Aug 1, 2009 1:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
who's arb eligible and racking up saves.
you could definitely send him to a top end team in need of a closer. he’ll be cheaper than kerry wood.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Challenge trade: Bobby Jenks for Scott Kazmir.
by CWSKeith on Aug 1, 2009 1:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
now you're thinkin, Keith.
that would be fun. Kazmir in a total low pressure situation as our fifth starter and if it’s not working, we can move him into the pen to have him go double barrel lefty action with Easy Heat.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd actually rather see Kaz moved to the pen to become a closer
I live in Tampa and I’m not sure he has it anymore
Good Guys Don't use the reply button
by stanleygoober on Aug 1, 2009 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm in Orlando and thought that last year.
I’ve watched him for a few years now and it looks like he has a hard time getting past the 5th. He has it in short spurts, though he sure can be wild.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kerry Wood was supposed to be good. I don't know what the perceived value of Jenks is. It might be worth it to keep him.
You just can’t assume there will be a team willing to give up something worthwhile in return. I’m not one for salary dumps.
They have a lot of guys they can bring up to relieve, too… I just don’t know so much who.
by Daniel Berlyn on Aug 1, 2009 1:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm making up possibilities
i can assume whatever i want. it’s not totally unreasonable to think Jenks might be valued by other teams.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They need to have a good bullpen or all of this is moot.
Might as well go with your best guns.
by Daniel Berlyn on Aug 1, 2009 1:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
which can't be Dan Hudson and the return for Jenks?
fuckinaye.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Besides, it isn't like you can predict who would take over for Jenks in the bullpen. They're going to have to make a decision on Dotel.
Linebrink isn’t getting better.
by Daniel Berlyn on Aug 1, 2009 1:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thornton, Hudson, Link, Pena, Linebrink + LOOGY
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still don't get why it has to be Hudson.
He has a plus slider already. I imagine it’s going to look a little different than this. Maybe Nunez and Link, I dunnah. Kind of pointless to pick this stuff out now.
by Daniel Berlyn on Aug 1, 2009 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm dreamin' on Hudson
Thornton was worth a league average starter last year and may well do the same this year. He’s taken over as Bobby’s declined.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Relievers can be shaken out of trees.
Aardsma is locking it down for SEA, even The Arsonist is doing OK for WSH. We might need a change of scenery guy but unless you have Mo Rivera, Hoffman (not the post-40 version), or Papelbon they all seem pretty fungible. Bobby’s greatest asset is that he’s been fairly predictable and reliable. Hasn’t had the Lidge-type mood/performance swings. Consistently above-average.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Decline probably isn't fair
he’s gotten help. His peripherals have rebounded this year, but he’s been pretty maddening for “predictable and reliable”.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No kidding
even thinking about Hudson in the bullpen (permanently) right now makes no sense. If he breaks into the bullpen at some point next year, that is different. But long term, you have to be thinking rotation with him . . . and I am sure they are.
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
by jc2313 on Aug 1, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if the sox get to the playoffs here is your rotation buehrle peavy floyd
by sox1 on Aug 1, 2009 12:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
you use 4 starters so danks would be in there too
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 12:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am very excited.
I think we can win this year and next year and the year after that. I don’t think that Carlos Torres will be that much worse than Clayton Richard was. If we can sneak into the playoffs this year, and we can run out Peavy, Buehrle, Floyd and Danks…. I think we could beat any team in the league.
Kenwo4life=ratings
by KenWo4LiFe on Aug 1, 2009 12:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well said,
I think Torres could easily replace Richard’s production . . . I just find it hilarious that a week and a half ago no one could stand Richard and wanted him out of the rotation at any cost . . . and now, how in the world are we going to find someone to replace Richard. Almost everyone here is bipolar, holy fuck.
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
by jc2313 on Aug 1, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We currently own a winning record against the AL east
who knew?
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 12:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
amazing considering 1-6 vs. toronto
"if it aint broke, dont break it"
by babyeater26 on Aug 1, 2009 12:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Betemit, Bobby, Pena, Q!, Danks and Wise are all arb eligible?
I assume Betemit is going to be traded for a bag of baseballs. Wise will probably get his to some degree at this point. Pena won’t be a backbreaker, but Danks, Q! and Bobby have to be more than 10 by themselves though, right? I think $15M is a better guess. That leaves ~$20-25M to play with 4 holes: DH, RF, CF, 5th starter.
The easy solution is to use most of it to pay Thome, Dye and Contreras in 1-2 year deals. Kenny has shown a tendency to reward his guys and they’re all decent bets for repeat performances in ’10. That leaves a couple mil for yet another stop gap CF solution while Mitchell and Danks have at it, not to mention backup catcher. There should be enough bullpen between Pena, Thornton, Jenks, Link, and Linebrink. Might need a LOOGY.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There'll be some options for CF
I think larry mentioned Ankiel — he seems like a guy to go after. He’s a second tier guy who I doubt will command all that big of a deal. He’s been hurt this year but the past two years he’s put up a (SLG heavy) 120 OPS+. I don’t think he’s any great shakes defensively but he’s certainly better than most everyone we’ve played out there this season.
I don’t know if anyone saw Peavy’s press conference on MLB Network but during it I’m pretty sure he makes mention of Mike Cameron. I think everyone here is pretty gah-gah (myself included) over Cameron — he’d be a pretty wonderful addition (at the right price, of course), so hopefully Peavy could do a little legwork*.
I believe you and I are in agreement w/r/t Dye and Thome both coming back (under the assumption that Thome comes back on a cheap cheap deal, which for reasons I’ve stated before seems pretty realistic). If Thome gets hurt or finally reaches the cliff’s edge you’ve got a reasonably decent backup plan in Flowers.
*Re: Cameron — I seem to recall a story about Cameron leaving the organization on not the happiest of terms because he found out that he was traded through the TV, not through a phone-call from his agent/the GM. Has anyone else heard something like this?
by CWSKeith on Aug 1, 2009 1:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i definitely like Ankiel as a buy low, solid upside guy
he looks like he can be around -2.5 UZR/150 in center, his bat determines how above or below average he’ll be.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about we sign both, ditch Thome, DH JD
and have Flowers on Alert 5 if Ankiel goes down.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love Thome, but I really think the Sox are playing with fire if they bring him back
Unless they can get a nice hometown discount, I don’t really want to roll the dice on him yet again.
by madvillian on Aug 1, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think he should resign JD to a 2 year deal
DH JD, and see if we can acquire a lefty corner outfielder. I haven’t really looked at the FA lists for 2010 so maybe this isn’t possible. But I think JD is a safer bet than Thome right now, and certainly has more value since you can still put him out in the field occasionally (like, during interleague).
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marlon Byrd, Rick Ankiel, Johnny Damon and Abreu
look like the only lefty OF bats.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Crawford was a FA at the end of the year?
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's got an option according to Cot's
i didn’t check what kind.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Byrd is righty and under control, I believe
by Daniel Berlyn on Aug 1, 2009 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the former is true, the latter i got off cots.
they could be wrong.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 1:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but they're not.
White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry
by larry on Aug 2, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Abreu took $5MM to go west with a contender.
Jim would take $5M to stay home. You guys are nuts to think otherwise. JR may pay him more because of 163, but he’s staying home. Wait until you are nearer retirement age, or talk to guys who are close to retirement. If no one fucks with them, if they are allowedto do their jobs without interference, they do NOT retire if they have any sort of work ethic. This is not about money or stats – he can still hit HR’s. And, shit, we signed KGJ so he could hit 600 with us and we had no earthly reason to do so out of loyalty for past service.
Book it. If he is healthy, he’s staying.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just dont think they can or should
keep Dye and Thome . . . and regarding loyalty, certainly Dye has the advantage there.
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
by jc2313 on Aug 1, 2009 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should, arguable.
Can, incontrovertable. Of course they can.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i mentioned ankiel like 2 months ago.
and nobody gave me the time of day.
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 2:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
turns out i was against it at the time... whoops.
but at that time they were both hitting crapily, and the same holds true now. the only difference is that ankiel has at least some SLG
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 2:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
set you up for that one.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 3:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it was deserved i suppose
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 3:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great link -
since I was the first one to hop all over that. I’d take him over anything visible on our roster for this year and next all day long.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i also realize it was only just over a month ago
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 2:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pena is arb elgible?
i thought we traded Allen so we would get a pre arb dotel for a couple of years
I like this trade even less now
i'll delete your SSS existence in a second. there is nothing that allows SSS posters, at any one moment, to keep posting, but the mere pleasure of larry.
-larry
by blackoutsox on Aug 1, 2009 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if i read Cheat's Payroll doc right.
which isn’t a guarantee. i can’t translate eastern time to central.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but i'm pretty sure it'll be more or less negligible
arb can’t be that much for a middle reliever.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What was Vizcaino's when he signed with the Yankees?
Maybe it wasn’t arb. But his contract was steep. And Dotel/Liney’s contracts, if used as a template sure aren’t cheap.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
dn, but i just spent some time browsing Cot's
$1-2M? we need to sign him out if we want a discount.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep
that gavin signing looks good right about now too
i'll delete your SSS existence in a second. there is nothing that allows SSS posters, at any one moment, to keep posting, but the mere pleasure of larry.
-larry
by blackoutsox on Aug 1, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kenny Williams. Fuck it. Going deep. Nothing new.
That they can absorb this contract should mean that they can go a little beyond this year’s payroll. They should be able to muster a fifth starter sans Contreras, but we’ll see what happens with that. I don’t know what will happen with Thome and Dye, the Sox depend on those guys a lot and it will be intriguing to see if they re-sign them both. I think they should be able to scrape at least one more year out of Dye and Thome, maybe Contreras and even Podsednik. They may even want to bring Dotel back. But that’s a long way off, especially considering how this team operates.
Fun contract structuring by Axelrod. The 4 mil buyout means that the Sox will have to decide whether they want Peavy for 18 million in 2013 after going from 15 to 16 to 17.
by Daniel Berlyn on Aug 1, 2009 1:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Peavy
He’s looking forward to pitching with Scott Linebrink and hopefully win a World Championship.
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 1:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
the jp deal works on so many levels.
b/c it provides the team tremendous flexibility going forward.
make the playoffs this year and you have a monster rotation that can compete with the best of them in a short series.
miss the playoffs and, depending on the economic outlook of baseball during the offseason, you can deal jake for a small loss, if economic circumstances dictate as much.
this move was very forward looking but also, given the division as is, could payoff in 2009 as well.
i imagine the negotiations happened something like this:
3:58 — your division rivals made some moves, are you sure you dont want JP?
3:59 — nah, i’m waiting to see if the ‘other team’ in town makes a move. if they don’t, get back to me. i may be willing to make a splash and buy some goodwill around here.
3:59:22 — doesn’t look like they are.
3:59:33 — what more do you want?
3:59:43 — throw in the jew.
3:59:50 — texting jerry now.
3:59:53 — and???
3:59:59 — consider it done.
by explodingpinwheelsforfunandprofit on Aug 1, 2009 1:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
throw the jew down the well
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 2:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
more like EPFFAP
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 2:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Either Thome or JD will take a pay cut next year.
Kenny is praying it is Jermaine. He has shown absolutely ZERO signs of decline both with the bat and will the glove. I think Kenny takes advantage of this economy and gives JD a 3 year deal worth around 20 million(like 6.3 a year) and throw in some incentives. Jermaine is going to have a very hard time finding a place that will pay him the money he is worth. Just ask Bobby Abreu and Orlando Hudson. I see Thome having a very hard time finding a job. If they Sox fail to get a corner outfielder this off-season, then they could give Thome a one year deal worth jack and have Dye man right field for one more season.
For CF, I really hope the Sox go get Coco Crisp. He is the ideal leadoff, quick CF the Sox need. Should cost less than 6 mil a year.
Lastly, trade Jenks for that 5th starter. Not a very popular move, but he will be demanding alot since he is arb eligible and there are better options to be had. He can get you a decent 3-4 SP, possibly a 2 guy and have Thorton close or sign one of Mike Gonzalez or Rafael Soriano as Atlanta won’t keep both.
I believe half of what the Sox would of had this off-season now goes to Peavy. Luckily MLB doesn’t have a salary cap, so if Kenny wants something, Kenny will go get it.
Phew, well that is my off-season in a nutshell.
by No Pressure on Aug 1, 2009 2:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dye 12M Option
Dye has a $12M option for next year. I wouldn’t expect him to erase that for a 1 yr pay cut. Maybe a 3yr deal at a lower rate.
by metasox on Aug 1, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's a mutual option so it's not his choice alone.
White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry
by larry on Aug 1, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd think JD would rather take a 3yr contract over the 12mil option
I like that better for the Sox as well, especially if its around 8 mil per
Good Guys Don't use the reply button
by stanleygoober on Aug 1, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not sure if this was shared earlier today, as i havent really been around much. (and/or drink)
but here is peavy on the deal.
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 2:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i didnt watch the game
but i just wathced the daily recap, and it looks like me made the yanks look stupid, but while doing so, playing really well at the same time. w00t.
i hate the yankees. just barely less than the twins.
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 2:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Okay i'm on board
Let’s Peavy this thing
I lept into the air like a little girl when Getz dropped that hit
¡signature!
by billyok on Aug 1, 2009 3:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
having just taken a look at the free agent crop
I would resign JD and Thome. Not much out there that will replace them.
I think your best option for center field is putting Alexei out there. He won’t have to do much thinking…just run down the ball and hit the cutoff man. Nix would then move into the starting infield (at ss or 3rd i guess)…. or you could sign Melvin Mora to hold it down for Viceido and leave nix as backup infielder.
If you trade Bobby for a starting pitcher, bring back Dotel. if you keep jenks, bring back contreras.
I think the sox are still going to win this the central this year…but this peavy deal brings me joy to look ahead to next year.
Kenwo4life=ratings
by KenWo4LiFe on Aug 1, 2009 3:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No reason to resign Thomer
I love the guy and he has given us some great years but I think he is going to retire after this year.
Let him go enjoy his privately stocked fishing and hunting lands and do some charity appearances for White Sox Charities.
by 815Sox on Aug 1, 2009 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he is quoted somewhere wanting to play another 1-2 years
but I agree with not resigning him next year.
"Jenks, who was never afraid to say "no" to a hamburger..."
by BobbySouthSide on Aug 1, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way he retires after this year, he wants to get to 600
…unlless we win it ALL, then he’ll retire.
Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity
by OznCoop on Aug 1, 2009 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if we win it all, he'll stay with just the sox for one or two years if we offer a cheap deal
kind of a wind down as he gets to 600
i'll delete your SSS existence in a second. there is nothing that allows SSS posters, at any one moment, to keep posting, but the mere pleasure of larry.
-larry
by blackoutsox on Aug 1, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He lives in Peoria, he's a family guy and fits well on the team,
he’s in a homer-happy park, andthe fans love him. He is not giving up the paycheck if he’s close to 600 and he’s healthy. If his back gives him much grief then he’ll retire. Not before. This team is getting to be fun. I bet he likes Getz/Becks and their enthusiasm. Kids do that to old guys – remind them that the game is fun. If the team sucked he’d be gone.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thome DH
Tough thing about Thome is his being a dedicated DH. Team loses flexibility. Unable to play him in NL parks and unable to rotate players like Quentin and Dye into the DH role when they have injuries. They may want to go in a diff direction.
by metasox on Aug 1, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I’d rather have JD at the DH, maybe move CQ to right, and then pick up someone with +defense like Carl Crawford
Good Guys Don't use the reply button
by stanleygoober on Aug 1, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
who dosent want carl crawford????
You cant have your your cake and eat it to. besides its good for thome when interleague comes around becouse he gets to rest his old ass bones. But like WU said their is no way he leaves chicago. too many factors. THOME,DYE,Q! STILL SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF ANY PITCHER THEIR FACING.
by G-E-T-Z GetzGetzGetz on Aug 1, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
interesting.
Cheat says:
I covered most of this in my ill-timed The Sox Mum At The Deadline piece. Seriously, I hit publish and literally seconds later I saw the first tweet about Peavy, and had it posted as an update 3 minutes after the original posting time.
‘’By the way, I write my [Internet blog] to Venezuela, and I say, ’We’re going to go with the same team.’ All of a sudden, two minutes later, I had to come back and say, ‘We just made a trade.’’’
could be a segment on one of those commercials for the ‘mysteries of the unknown’ books from the 80s.
by Trooper on Aug 1, 2009 3:48 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
cheat being ozzie would also explain some of the questionable english/writing skills on the front page.
Cashing checks and having sex.
by MarketMaker on Aug 1, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Does Ozzie have another spanish language blog other than what is posted on the official MLB site (orgullosox.com)?
I’d be more than willing to poke around his blog and post updates if there is anything interesting. No need to do that for orgullosox since his columns are all translated.
A half-hearted search for Oswaldo Guillen and related terms on Google Venezuela came up empty.
Go Sox!
by luzinski on Aug 1, 2009 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i have a weird feeling we are going to be giddy at the end of the deadline.
i dunno what it is, but i think KW has something up his sleeve for this season…
by BoeJouma on Jul 29, 2009 9:25 PM CDT to parent
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 3:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You apparently have a little WTGTD in you!
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If WTGTD is in you,
you can bet it’s only a little. Biology.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
zing!
brndnprkns: I'm pretty sure the "badass" value of your life is closer to Gigli than The Dark Knight
by whitesoxmatt on Aug 1, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wat?
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm -- not a particularly grand idea to enter a 440 person poker tourney at 1:00 a.m. expecting you'll be out shortly. Here I am at 5:00, still alive.
I’ve made a huge mistake.
by CWSKeith on Aug 1, 2009 4:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A healthy Q! please
That starting rotation, nice. And a core of Beckham, Q! and Tyler Flowers, all of whom have the talent to post a .900+ OPS, nice.
You can build a very solid team around those pieces, and there’s lot’s of room in the budget to fill in around it. Good time to be a Sox fan woohoo! next few years should be fun.
"It was like everything was slow motion," Wise said. "I stuck my hand out so slowly and was able to make the catch."
by ChicagoPete on Aug 1, 2009 5:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Peavey - great signing
Home: 779 K, 212 BB, 51 HR in 728.1 IP, 2.83 ERA
Road: 569 K, 223 BB, 84 HR in 614.1 IP, 3.84 ERA
Coors Field: 36 K, 24 BB, 8 HR in 51.0 IP, 4.59 ERA
Chase Field: 81 K, 34 BB, 17 HR in 78.0 IP, 5.77 ERA
Non-thin-air Road:452 K, 165 BB, 59 HR, 485.1 IP, 3.45 ERA
==> For those who don’t like math, that’s a 9.0 K/9 rate,against a 2.9 BB/9 rate. Road rates (even including the rough parks) are 8.3 K/9 and 3.3 BB/9. Oh, and he’s getting better, with a 10.1 K/9 rate in 2009!!!
For the record, the typical Home/Away split in the NL is 0.50 ERA (4.47 to 3.97 in 2009). Clearly, Peavy has had some problems in Chase Field and Coors Field, but there are no thin air parks in the White Sox division, and only a few games per year in Texas. And any Petco pitcher is going to obviously have a larger-than-typical Home/Road split. But, if you compare the non-thin-air stats (3.45 ERA) to the average road ERA in the NL, Peavy has been a full run better than average (3.45 to 4.47). That’s a Pythagorean win% of .627. The average road win% is .447, so Peavy is .180 better than an average pitcher on the road, a fantastic advantage.
by hoodlight on Aug 1, 2009 6:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
where's this from?
brndnprkns: I'm pretty sure the "badass" value of your life is closer to Gigli than The Dark Knight
by whitesoxmatt on Aug 1, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's written by a disgruntled Cubs fan
I think he’s a bit jealous
http://www.baseballdailydigest.com/blogs/2009/07/31/are-white-sox-fans-defective/
by hoodlight on Aug 1, 2009 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks
brndnprkns: I'm pretty sure the "badass" value of your life is closer to Gigli than The Dark Knight
by whitesoxmatt on Aug 1, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somehow not mentioned in this
is the coupof getting him (finally) when the Cubs oveted him. Was mentioned often in May, but should not be underestimated. Kicked the Cubs off the front page (and the AL East, for that matter). Gotta think “revenue”, too. His first year’s pay has been paid for already just with the signing news.
Now if his ankle stays fucked up we’re in trouble. And he did have elbow issues, IIRC, so hopefully he’s using this time to get everything healthy. THAT’s the risk. We don’t need Carl Pavano’s medical history after shelling out for a large contract.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And this from
ASK THE BASEBALL EXPERT
By Tony DeMarco
NBCSports.com contributor
Winners
blah, blah, blah………………..
Losers
blah, blah, blah………………..
Chicago White Sox: Kenny Williams isn’t afraid to make a mistake, and in this case, he’s made it twice. He’s dealt for an injured pitcher in Jake Peavy, who probably won’t be back until late-August, and will be moving out of the National League in general and the safe-haven of Petco Park in particular, and headed to a home-run-heavy park in the better-hitting league.
Even without the injury/long-term concerns, Peavy’s numbers are going to inflate. And the Sox reportedly are taking on all of the rest of his enormous contract ($52 million left after this season). This is a buyer-beware situation. He already turned down one deal to go to the south side of Chicago — although says he feels differently now. And while waiting for Peavy’s return from the disabled list, the Sox have weakened their immediate rotation options by dealing Richard and the Aaron Poreda, the best of the four-pitcher package.
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/32245552/ns/sports-baseball/
………………….
But what about F-I-E-L-D-E-R-S?
by ballyb on Aug 1, 2009 7:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Baseball Expert? Never heard of this jamoke
The injury isn’t much of an issue in my book. It is an ankle injury…not like he has been having arm/shoulder problems. This isn’t a rental type deal – this is a long-term deal. The goal is to ride the wave and stay competitive in the division, even without a legit #5 until Peavy comes back, hopefully in early Sept. or earlier. Sox have been riding the #5 starter wave all year anyways, so not too much of a risk. Baseball expert point number one = garbage.
His second point of an NL pitcher going to the AL and especially the Cell is somewhat thrown out of context. Sure his numbers will probaly inflate, due to pitching in a better league and getting out of Petco…but to say the sox bet the farm on this is a joke. Peavy is a legitimate 1 or 2…sox at best gave up a 3 and 4 for him…..at best.
I don’t see this as much of a Huge Gamble as a lot of the writers are saying. I think we all know Richard isn’t going to turn into an Ace pitcher and in my opinion he probably will be pitching out of the bullpen in the future. I also haven’t seen anything from Poreda that says he can be a dominate 1 or 2 starter. I think he looks more like an arm out of the bullpen or a middle rotation guy, if he can develop some of his other pitches. Carter is more of a wildcard to me…I have to trust larry’s judgement on him in his fanpost.
Yeah, the contract is large – but as mentioned by Cheat, it shouldn’t handcuff the Sox in a major way going forward.
I see this move as solidifying the rotation for the next two years and still gives the club flexibility to deal with the other major position holes they will face….all in all I am happy with the move. We didn’t give up Beckham, Viciedo, Flowers, Danks, Mitchell, Hudson, etc. Future looks bright….
"Jenks, who was never afraid to say "no" to a hamburger..."
by BobbySouthSide on Aug 1, 2009 7:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As conservative as the Sox are re pitching
I’m sure they had to be very, very certain that this guy is going to be healthy for the term of his contract. You don’t get many chances to grab a legitimate #1 starter, and we just got one – nuff said. And we didn’t give up anything that’s going to hurt us (like two #1 picks for a Class A FA), all it basically cost was money.
"It was like everything was slow motion," Wise said. "I stuck my hand out so slowly and was able to make the catch."
by ChicagoPete on Aug 1, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ankles are delicate things.
As someone who sparained mine 3 times in one week in college, it was never right after that. And even though it’s not his, tell me pushing off/landing is not important in the throwing motion. I don’t claim to know the injury’s depth, but I can see this backfiring, sure. We had signed Grant Hill wheile he had ankle issues that were supposed to resolve themselves, andhey never did while he was with us. Different type of injury, sure, but I’m just sayin’.
And his agent taking the very large step back means “I want absolutely no liability if this guy does not come back at any time at full strength”.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
all he needs to do is stretch more.
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
somehow I don't think the Sox make decisions based on agent's words
The risk is the money. Its not a huge risk for the Sox. Some franchises yes. The huge gamble angle is overblown to sound important.
"Oh well back to work"
by Tdogg on Aug 1, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
problem, of course
is that the agent probably has a bit better of an idea of the condition of peavy. probably tempest in a teacup but that quote doesn’t inspire confidence.
White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry
by larry on Aug 1, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
fuck tony demarco.
it is what it is......
by BuehrleMan on Aug 1, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
who?
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"the aaron poreda"
that would involve a whole bunch of skull fucking.-BoeJouma
by furby2056 on Aug 1, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i read a different artice that said the sox were the winners at the deadline.
knocked his fucking dick in the dirt! - BuehrleMan
by BoeJouma on Aug 1, 2009 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yesterday
For about 30 seconds, I remember sitting at work “working” (aka paying attention to the trade deadline, my supervisor is a baseball fan so she understood) and thinking “I wonder what is going on with Peavy, maybe they will try that again…. nooo that is pretty stupid”
Then a little while later while doing a home visit with one of my clients I get a text “Sox trade for Peavy”. I was pumped.
I like this trade because it has to potential to improve us this year, but is more about the future. This always was and still is a rebuilding year. We just happen to be in a shit division. These next few years are going to be great. That is another thing I like about Kenny, when we rebuild we get it done in about a year.
by 815Sox on Aug 1, 2009 8:32 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i don't know how a fan of the Whitesox could not like the chances for this team within the next 2-3 years
The infield is basically set, with time it will improve both offensivley and deffensively.
The rotation is stacked, and will be set with a possible 5th starter pickup or callup
The pen, looking at the numbers SHOULD be one of the best in baseball but who knows
The outfield is really the only area in need of an upgrade, obviously in center.
Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity
by OznCoop on Aug 1, 2009 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This reminds me of the trade to get Garcia
Didn’t really help much that year but looked pretty good the next. Obviously since Garcia was technically a rental when we acquired him, it didn’t cost as much, but KW wouldn’t have made the trade if he didn’t know he could sign him to a 3 year deal. Then down the road he flipped sweaty freddy for Floyd.
It’s been increasingly clear what KW’s “moneyball” is. After early missteps in his career (Todd Ritchie, David Wells), there is a pattern:
1. Only “bet the farm” (i.e. give up a lot of value) for top-tier veterans he has under control for many years at salaries that are below or at their value (Thome, Garcia, Vazquez, Peavy). The risk premium he’s paying (the prospects he gives up) is in exchange for the other team eating the risk on the long term deals it takes to sign these guys in the market .
2. Only give long-term deals to home-grown, exceptional players (Buehrle, hopefully Beckham), and even then, they aren’t that long.
3. Sell overrated prospects high (McCarthy, Poreda) for long-term better players (whether better prospects farther out (Danks) or veterans with reasonable deals (Peavy))
4. Acquire undervalued second-tier free agents when possible (Dye, AJ, Dotel)
5. Acquire high-risk formerly highly regarded prospects cheaply and see if they can meet their potential (Floyd, Quentin, Thornton, Jenks)
6. Strategically dump veterans who won’t be missed long-term to restock system
I think the thing that is most impressive is the speed at which KW makes these moves and readjusts the roster. The team we are fielding right now is better than the one we had in spring training. KW doesn’t hold on to losing bets too long. Sure there will be mistakes like Swisher along the way, but given the high risk/high reward nature of KW’s strategy, that is going to happen.
There’s a compelling case to make that KW is the best GM in chicago.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:00 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
problem w/ swisher is that he sold low...
Kenny rule #7 – if we hate you – you will be gone.
by el paulito on Aug 1, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This can be debated -
but remember when he was sold, as it was THE worst economic climate (panic) since the Depression. He did well to get rid of the contract. Sept. 2008-March 2009 was absolutely petrifying regarding economics.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
further support: the Yankees were the beneficiary
they would have been most able to take on contracts.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Little known and argued point WU
The only defense.
"Oh well back to work"
by Tdogg on Aug 1, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally I think Swisher was a violation of rule #1
Swisher was not a top-tier veteran and not worth “betting the farm” on.
Linebrink is a violation of rule #2
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
linebrink is number 2.
it is what it is......
by BuehrleMan on Aug 1, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good piece.
Best GM in Chicago title seems fairly obvious, if all you count is hardware/flags. Even wins/$ spent seems obvious, too, though maybe the Hawks are starting to rival that (I don’t know, I don’t closely follow them). But I think he is certainly underrated, as evidenced by his standing in the GM poll.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Hawks fired Tallon
so it is unknown whether the younger Bowman will be any good. And Tallon has made a lot of mistakes, and given how miserable the Hawks were, you better damn well build a good team of young players if you are constantly drafting that high.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another rule
7. Only acquire veteran rentals if the price is equivalent to Masset (or literally Masset)
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
this is only funny because its probably the truest
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's gotten much better at drafting too
i'll delete your SSS existence in a second. there is nothing that allows SSS posters, at any one moment, to keep posting, but the mere pleasure of larry.
-larry
by blackoutsox on Aug 1, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats because he took over the draft personally
instead of that one guy whom they fired
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
personally?
Shaffer’s running the draft.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 1:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like this Vince
and would like to see it expanded. By that I mean use test cases (as some have done below) and see it refined. Any rational person would agree the KW led White Sox with Ozzie are one interesting franchise. If they can manage another WS in the next 3 years a book outlining all this would be great. I would argue no has been more instrumental in at least “opening” the minds of a few seamheads that there is more than 1 way to skin a cat.
There have been warts, growth and genius. The next few years should be a ball.
"Oh well back to work"
by Tdogg on Aug 1, 2009 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
With a new CFer
and better F-I-E-L-D-I-N-G.
;)
But what about F-I-E-L-D-E-R-S?
by ballyb on Aug 1, 2009 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
vince should definitely make a post.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 1:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
flesh it out, make a post.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 1:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Swisher trade just seems like a rare confluence of factors
Factor 1: Nobody liked Swisher
Factor 2: Career worst year
Factor 3: economic panic
Still, not a good move, but I can see why it was made. That said, why didn’t the Sox ask for Gardner?
by madvillian on Aug 1, 2009 10:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
or anybody at all worth having
there were plenty of actual prospects without major league contracts to be had.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It isn't the contract so much as what you gave up for him.
This was not a bargain in any sense of the word. You gave up your 2nd and 3rd best prospects for Peavy, who may flunk in his transition to the American League.
And he’s making around $15 a year. You don’t really know what you’re buying, and you gave up a ton for him. I give credit to Kenny Williams for the ballsy move, but it was far from wise.
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Aug 1, 2009 10:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jealous?
Well, you got our old SS. Congrats. It is high risk/high reward, something Teh Twinn would NEVER do. Enjoy our aura for the next few days as we bask in success.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, not jealous at all.
With the price Cliff Lee went for (Philadelphia’s 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 10th best prospects) I knew there was no chance of landing a starting pitcher besides maybe Washburn.
You keep your Peavy, we’ll keep our plethora of young, able starting pitchers, and we’ll continue our dominating ways into the Target Field era.
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Aug 1, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
tongue in cheek?
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And we'll continue dominating Game 163.
(I would like your catcher, first baseman, and closer, though. Can you help?)
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"We'll see how they hit when its fucking 20 degrees out" - ozzie
I think you’re making the mistake that the way the Twins run their organization is the only way to go about things. The Twins have to keep all their prospects in the system because they don’t have a choice. There’s more than one way to skin a cat, and the white sox can afford to do things differently.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, but who's your best prospect besides Beckham now?
Jordan Danks?
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Aug 1, 2009 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Becks is no longer a "prospect",
unless you mean “prospective ROY”. Hudson/Danks/Flowers/Viciedo/Mitchell are all fine prospects.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless I'm mistaken, though, all those but Flowers and Danks are within two years of the majors.
It’s a completely different philosophy than the Twins, and I’m completely foreign to the “trade away all top minor-league prospects for three-four years of one player” strategy.
Major props to you if it works out, but I have my doubts.
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Aug 1, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
*aren't within two years of the majors
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Aug 1, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that's the fun thing about baseball
Two teams that go about business in totally different ways (Twins, Sox), yet come more often than not, come september, find themselves duking it out for the division crown.
I think we can both agree on one thing – thank god neither of us is the royals.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Agreed, and rec'd.
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Aug 1, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't move the bar.
Prospect = prospect. We had a baren farm up until last year because of our 2006-2007 season. And who cares if it’s a prospect who lights it up or a scrap heap find (Jenks/Floyd/Quentin) who performs. Tell me how it works out in the final standings. That’s what the team is judged by.
You have a great minor league system and enviable front office folks. We’re happy with ours. And we’ve won our World Series most recently, as we have our division, compared to you guys. So we’ll agree to disagree.
Should be an interesting finish this year.
(Plus, Flowers might make the trip North next year.)
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the sox have a good amount of young talent on the MLB roster. with 6 major contributors born in '81 or later, i don't think this team has a dearth of youth.
Cashing checks and having sex.
by MarketMaker on Aug 1, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plenty of teams with older rosters than us
I think we get somewhat of an unfair shake as being labeled “old” because our heart of the order is old.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, the point of the minor league system is to make the major league team better, right?
one way would be for those minor leaguers to become productive MLBers.
another way would be to trade them for productive MLBers.
it’s not rocket science. it’s risk/reward. and jake peavy has been more than productive in his career and he’s only 28. i’m not saying it’s a no-brainer, but this was an opportunity to improve and i think all things considered it’s a shot worth taking.
Cashing checks and having sex.
by MarketMaker on Aug 1, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey risk/reward
is my cup of tea! get of the jock son!
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's what i do for a living, buddy. i didn't say bills of lading.
Cashing checks and having sex.
by MarketMaker on Aug 1, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so you get into high risk/reward situations on a daily basis?
I hope you wear a bannana peel. If not, that is not rug burn you are looking at!
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Sox have been doing with success for some time now.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
for your doubts see 2005
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Last time I checked, it wasn't the team with the best prospects that wins at the end of the season
but the one with the best record. We’ve had a weak system for years and still been in contention on a regular basis.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
get out of here, fool!
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like Liriano?
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Aug 1, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, larry will probably give me some smack down since I'm going out on a limb here
But the reason why I view Poreda as overrated is he’s the best pitching prospect in a system that isn’t full of a ton of great pitching prospects. So I think that makes him look more valuable than he really is. I’m not saying that Poreda is a bad prospect — he’ll probably play in the majors whether in the bullpen or as a starter, which is better than most. But he’s not a sure thing.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
where's his change up coming from?
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a poor-man's Matt Thornton without the 97 mph heat
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One word.
Anti-Semite.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you don't really know what you're buying
the guys who make the decisions have better information.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, point taken.
But your staff has seven years of dominating performance in the National League to look at. How will that change when Peavy faces the highly-paid bats of New York and Boston that we both loathe?
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Aug 1, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, we're 12-11 this year against them,
and better if you remove the 1-6 TOR record. How you doin’?
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
park and league adjustments can be found.
these aren’t complicated calculations for a front office. the Sox have a solid track record on this in particular.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 1, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if the sox think he can pitch in the cell they are probably right.
They also probably think they can keep him healthy.
The Peavy part of the trade I’m fine with. I think he’s going to be at least as good as Javier, with the potential to be alot better.
Giving up 4 players for 1 can always come back to bit you though.
by madvillian on Aug 1, 2009 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
watch peavy throw a baseball and tell me his stuff isn't good enough to pitch in the al central
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't agree with your prospect rankings.
Cashing checks and having sex.
by MarketMaker on Aug 1, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sheehan labels the Peavy deal as his "best move"
Trading for a pitcher on the disabled list would hardly seem to qualify, but Kenny Williams finally got his man, trading Aaron Poreda and three other pitchers for Jake Peavy. It’s a huge gamble with both short-term upside—Peavy should be back from his ankle injury for September—and long-term payoff—he’s signed through 2012 at a reasonable $16 million average annual value (AAV), with a big 2013 option. The elbow injury that curtailed his 2008 season is a concern, of course, as is the possibility that Peavy’s ankle won’t let him pitch or pitch effectively during the Sox’ pennant push. Nevertheless, for what amounts to Poreda and filler (I’m not a Clayton Richard fan, although he’ll love Petco), it’s a strong move that, at worst, positions the Sox as co-favorites in the AL Central.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 11:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
but they should traded beckham while they still can
Twitter: @SouthSideCheat
SouthSideSox on Facebook
by The Cheat on Aug 1, 2009 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
beckham for halladay and we got
halladay
buehrle
peavy
danks
floyd
………..
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart
by Jbasic89 on Aug 1, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And lots of 3-1 games
with 1 ER.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is all over the map.
We’re a pack of a-holes. by rhythm on Apr 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
And my tradition of contributing absolutely nothing to this site...
continues.by ReservoirDog on Jul 21, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
by winningugly on Aug 1, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, why is he ignoring the memo of "All White Sox transactions must be ridiculed to no end"?
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Aug 1, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Joe in the very least says what he thinks.
He’s wrong a lot, but so are we and he’s still a pretty good writer, especially when he’s on. Looks like he’s been off his game for a bit now, but he was firing on all cylinders earlier in the season.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 2:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why this trade was made...
You can’t have 4 lefty starters in 2010. This move was made to balance the rotation period.
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 11:12 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
agreed.
that has a lot to do with it.
Kenwo4life=ratings
by KenWo4LiFe on Aug 1, 2009 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why can't a team have 4 lefty starters?
White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry
by larry on Aug 1, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Makes it too difficult to set your rotation come playoff time.
I am not saying you “can’t” have 4 lefty starters but I would imagine it is more desirable to have a balanced rotation, especially in the playoffs.
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i guess i did say you"can't" but you know what i mean.
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i suppose it depends upon who you're sending out there.
but danks and MB don’t really have platoon splits. we can get into the “should i look at the pitcher’s splits or the hitter’s splits” for this but, if you have four guys who are better than your other options and happen to be lefty, i don’t think it’s a concern. moot now, i guess.
White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry
by larry on Aug 1, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
IWhy isn't it seen as an advantage to have as many lefties in the rotation. they're harder to come by therefore players see them less often.
Oz+Coop+Hawk= baseball trinity
by OznCoop on Aug 1, 2009 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am talking about seeing them in a short series.
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never understood this reasoning
If the 4 are really good who cares.
"Oh well back to work"
by Tdogg on Aug 1, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's not saying you can't, he's just saying you can't in 2010.
Cashing checks and having sex.
by MarketMaker on Aug 1, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ideally you would like to give opposing teams different looks in the playoffs...
IME
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I understand that
But if the pitchers really are “good” that doesn’t much matter.
"Oh well back to work"
by Tdogg on Aug 1, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well when your 4 lefties consist of
danks
buehrle
richard
poreda
You have some Q!uestion marks.
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed.I said good.
"Oh well back to work"
by Tdogg on Aug 1, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well it's what we would have had
nam sayin?
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if we would have
i doubt kenny makes the deal.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 2:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
please explain, i am not understanding your logic.
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 2, 2009 3:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if Poreda and Richard were definitely going to be solid starters
there’s no point in dealing for Peavy.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 5:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 6, 2009 6:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't help but smile as I remember some of the stuff written in the baseball world when
They didn’t trade, then signed Buerhle to his contract
Didn’t punt 2008
Signed Floyd to his contract
traded Swisher (okay I have to be fair lol)
Started the year with Richard, Contreras and Colon
Traded for Peavy???
"Oh well back to work"
by Tdogg on Aug 1, 2009 12:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I remember the radio shows ripping KW - saying the initial Peavy move was for press
He was doing to appease fans, didn’t really want him, just wanted to put fans in the seats. They talked about the deal not being real.
One catch (and 1 hit) does not make you a major league player... or does it?
by Brush Back on Aug 1, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was all a ploy to get Peavy to the Cubs
steak dinner boom.
¡signature!
by billyok on Aug 1, 2009 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I admit, I really thought it was a PR move.
You gotta admit, signing pitchers (non family members) to expensive contracts is not something the organization does regularly, especially in these economic times.
But what about F-I-E-L-D-E-R-S?
by ballyb on Aug 1, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
seems like that would have been kind of a risky PR move.
what if peavy said yes the first time?
White Sox Minor League Updates: http://twitter.com/SouthSidelarry
by larry on Aug 1, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I figured they'd
inquired (Linebrink, friends, grapevine) and knew he wouldn’t accept. Lots of “figurin’” goes on in this noggin of mine.
But what about F-I-E-L-D-E-R-S?
by ballyb on Aug 1, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
doubtful
you sure are a conspiracy theorist!
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 1, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it seems to me the organization has balked more about the length of contracts
then the price. With Peavy falling in that JR-approved three year sweet spot, I always thought this was for real.
fucking dome
by vince_ on Aug 1, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Been gone for the past 24 hours
anything happen? I hear that Peavy guy was traded . . . what a pussy that guy is. Cant believe he didnt want to come here, just wanted to stay in the NL for a loser. He would have fit in great here with the pussy SS we have and the pussy GM we have who isnt willing to make any deadline moves. Maybe we got a box of tampons at the deadline . . . bunch of pussies this team is. Guess I get to watch these bunch of women lose this afternoon . . .
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
by jc2313 on Aug 1, 2009 2:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i love "pussy" used as adj. and nouns.
u make me laugh
by G-E-T-Z GetzGetzGetz on Aug 1, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next year's #5? Coop can fix him.
Padres To Release Mark Prior
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/08/padres-to-release-mark-prior.html
But what about F-I-E-L-D-E-R-S?
by ballyb on Aug 1, 2009 2:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably too fucked up to be a reclamation project
It would be high comedy to see him be an effective starter in Chicago on a team that isn’t clueless about burning out young arms.
The Chicago Bulls.....the more profitable Los Angeles Clippers.
by Ozzie Montana on Aug 1, 2009 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i would really enjoy that if it came to fruition.
THIS STORY ONLY ENDS ONE WAY
by colintj on Aug 2, 2009 2:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
rotation next year
1. Buerhle
2. Peavy
3. Danks
4. Floyd
5. Contrheas
Go Huskies!
by Huskies1997 on Aug 1, 2009 11:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i dont think count will be in the rotation
just my opinion….
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 2, 2009 3:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think he will
he has pitched good and unless he is blown away by a contract offer which i doubt I would suspect that he could be had pretty cheap and is better than alternatives that would be available at his price.
Kenwo4life=ratings
by KenWo4LiFe on Aug 2, 2009 3:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're no nastradamus
"you should go back to your cowardly practice of offering no opinion of your own."
-picktoclick
by Where Triples Go to Die on Aug 6, 2009 6:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















