Crash Years: U-God's slightly realistic 2012 White Sox offseason plan
It's that time of the year again. The GM meetings are coming up this week, so I think it's high time for a little rosterbation. You may remember from such pipe dreams as obtaining Mike Napoli for Carlos Quentin last winter or picking up Marlon Byrd for the hole in center field before the 2010 season. This is usually one of my favorite posts to write each season, as I get to pretend I have some sort of actual authority and ability to make things happen. This year's post was a little less fun. The combination of poor attendance and $43MM tied up between the likes of Adam Dunn, Jake Peavy, and Alex Rios, there's no true way to be active on the free agent market. Payroll is going down, and if you believe larry (I am usually inclined to), we're talking about a payroll around $100-105MM or so. Unlike last year, we're not emptying the coffers. Oh, and I'm just going to call every league minimum contract $0.5MM for easy math.
Time to say goodbye:This is the hard part. If we're really cutting payroll this winter, there's no way to bring Mark Buehrle back next season. If the Marlins and Red Sox (among others) are actually interested, we will be outbid. I'm going to miss him, but sentimentality is for the old and the weak. There's a reason I'm good at euthanasia. Mark, it's been amazing. We'll see you in a few years when you're ready to retire a White Sox.
Arbitration:
I have been an unyielding advocate over the past two years for signing John Danks to the Jon Lester deal. This no longer seems like it's going to ever happen. So we'll take him to arbitration for the final time and hope for the best. If we can get him to sign to an extension during the season, fantastic. If not, expect him to be traded come July if the season is in the tank. I'm projecting him to get anywhere from $7.6-8.5MM in arbitration, so for the sake of simplicity we'll call it $8MM.
Trade bait:
You probably noticed that Carlos Quentin's name wasn't in the arbitration part of this post. Well done, astute reader. Trading Quentin is a relatively easy way to free up $6-7MM and get something back in return. Other than Carlos Beltran, the free agent market for corner outfielders is pretty hideous (unless you like the idea of giving up your first round pick for Michael Cuddyer). I don't see a good fit for any major league ready talent like KW would prefer, so I'd like to help restock the farm system a bit. Have you looked at Oakland's depth chart recently? It's awesome. That looks like a need to me. Quentin isn't going to bring back an extreme amount of talent, but he could bring back some interesting pieces. A lot of the shine that was once on Michael Taylor when he came over in the Brett Wallace trade has since faded, making him the perfect KW target. And while we're in the business of taking prospects they may have soured on, why not toss Nequa Valley High School product Ian Krol in as well? Krol has talent, but spent the 2011 season suspended for an idiotic text. This may have knocked his stock down enough to get him tossed in as well.
This other trade may be a little less realistic. Alex Anthopoulos does not care for this high-priced closer market. AA has developed quite the farm system up there in Toronto. This is where KW needs to step in. If he can ship Jesse Crain and his 2/$9MM contract to the Blue Jays, he clears up another solid chunk of payroll and has a little bit of leverage to work with. Is Crain an ideal closer? I don't know, but I do know he's a pretty damn good relief pitcher signed for a lot less money than most relievers of his caliber will go for this winter. I'd love it if we could get Jake Marisnick for our troubles. Marisnick had a great year in his first full year in the Midwest League. He's just another chit in the reasonably stacked Blue Jays' farm system, but would be a top five player in ours.
Free agent:
We only really have the money to sign one middle-tier free agent, so I want David DeJesus. The former Royal/Athletic had an off year last season, which should drive down his asking price. DeJesus should be brought in on a 1/$4.5MM deal with incentives. But where would he play, you ask? Left field. He's great defensively in left, and if he bounces back to his career .776 OPS, he'll provide a solid bat from the second spot in the lineup.
Finished roster:
Lineup: Alejandro De Aza-CF, David DeJesus-LF, A.J. Pierzynski-C, Paul Konerko-1B, Adam Dunn-DH, Alexei Ramirez-SS, Dayan Viciedo-RF, Brent Morel-3B, Gordon Beckham-2B. Bench: Tyler Flowers-C, Brent Lillibridge-UTIL, Osvaldo Martinez-INF, Alex Rios-OF.
That's right. Alex Rios is benched. Is A.J. in the three-hole ideal? No. But there can be some realigning of the lineup once Dayan proves he can hack it in the pros again. Osvaldo Martinez replaces Omar Vizquel as a utility infielder that can actually play shortstop and third base without making us worry about arm strength. This is Gordon Beckham's last stand.
Rotation: Jake Peavy, John Danks, Gavin Floyd, Phillip Humber, Chris Sale.
This is a bit of hoping for the best, as it will be hard to get 30 starts each out of Peavy and Sale. This is accounted for in the bullpen though.
Bullpen: Sergio Santos, Jason Frasor, Matt Thornton, Will Ohman, Addison Reed, Gregory Infante, and Zach Stewart.
Just because Ozzie is gone doesn't mean the end of the twelve man pitching staff. If we're going to attempt using Sale and Peavy, we'll need a long man/spot starter. This is Zach Stewart's job. He can get experience pitching out of the bullpen and learn from Don Cooper all year.
Bottom line:
It's not the sexiest team in the world and it relies on Adam Dunn and Jake Peavy not sucking heavily, but this is what you get for the money range allotted. Using Cot's, this team costs $106.25MM, putting payroll just below that of the 2007 team. The prospects picked up don't fix the farm system, but they should help to move it out of last place in the eyes of the prospect mavens.
124 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Makes too much sense to be realistic.
Nice work.
To my knowledge, certain things were not known.
-James Murdoch
by 2ndHalfAdjustments on Nov 14, 2011 4:45 PM CST reply actions
Buehrle isn't your dog, and he isn't a lame horse. But I'm a SOW, Sentimental, Old, and Weak.
Otherwise, your team isn’t bad…only 1/2 bad which makes them .500 if I counted right. If true, at least we get to see a full season of Morel and De Aza (assuming health) and that should be entertaining enough to watch with interest. Maybe not for the casual fan, but those 2 and Sale starting are enough for me.
Thanks for the post Dr. Kevorkian!
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
I like the acquisiton of DeJesus more than my go-to of Rios starting and Danks II as the 4th OF.
Very reasonable post. There aren’t a whole lot of options to play with given the Sox’ high ratio of unmovable contracts to money and prospects. I kind of expect Jerry to get all nostalgia-y and demand Buehrle back, and if that happens we’re guaranteed to see another starting pitcher leave with Quentin and possibly some more of the bullpen guys. Since that would give Kenny the best chance to do something crazy and probably damaging in the long term, that’s kind of what I expect.
by mechanical turk on Nov 14, 2011 5:17 PM CST reply actions
JR is a smart man who knows what he is doing, he is not going to allow sentiment to cloud his judgement
Mark is going to cost lots and lots of money…. I doubt that the Sox cuts are going to be as drastic as feared, but one of the worst things to do would be to spend all the money on one will be one of the most expensive starters on the market.
I doubt it would work out well for Mark either, we know how quickly Sox fans (and fans in general) turn on players who do not live up to the big money contract.
Don't let your fandom cloud your judgement of his worth.
There aren’t that many idiot GM’s left out there. We want him back because of who he ia and what he’s done for us… And the Sox. Objectively though…
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
I already talked to you about this
but I think Taylor could still be better than Quentin could realistically be worth. From the A’s anyway, who should value Q appropriately. Still, it’s a tough plan to put together given the limitations KW put on you.
So fast he could hit a ball up the middle and it would hit him in the ass sliding into second.
by colintj on Nov 14, 2011 5:25 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Yeah, it's definitely less believable than my Quentin trade last year.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
this is also my favorite post of the year of yours. great job.
I’m working on the KenWo plan. It will be unveiled at a later date (hopefully this saturday). Mine is a little more extreme and a little more unrealistic. but what the hell.
Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.
Since U-God's front pagers usually turn into the RRRR (meme, kids)...
Bill James’ 2012 projections are out and included in Fangraph’s player pages.
Adam Dunn:
.220/.355/.443
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
Rios: .269/.323/.434
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
Morel: .273/.314/.418
And I’m done.
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
Boy, if you could guarantee me Rios' numbers, I'd be okay.
I wouldn’t love it, but I’d be okay with it.
To my knowledge, certain things were not known.
-James Murdoch
by 2ndHalfAdjustments on Nov 14, 2011 6:09 PM CST up reply actions
If he has to play I'd rather it was a corner with De Aza in CF.
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
Agreed.
And that would make Q a goner.
To my knowledge, certain things were not known.
-James Murdoch
by 2ndHalfAdjustments on Nov 14, 2011 6:13 PM CST up reply actions
if i'm not mistaken, james' numbers are always pretty optimistic.
which means get ready for some depressing projections for rios and dunn.
Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.
I don't think this is true anymore
Egus can speak better on it. (He’s used them for years) but they pretty much even out now.
"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun
optimistic for younger players
he’s projecting them as if they make it as major leaguers. so, like, 75th percentile projection.
So fast he could hit a ball up the middle and it would hit him in the ass sliding into second.
I could live with all 3 of those
"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun
optimistic
Warning: Read my posts at your own risk!
by JofpGallagher on Nov 15, 2011 5:26 AM CST up reply actions
If De Aza posts a .291/.353/.450 and only gets 240 PA's...
I’ll lose my lunch.
This was so much more fun than studying for pharm.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
like your idea about signing dejesus
I don’t expect many signings in FA either, but DeJesus is really underrated and came up with some clutch hits against us. Also like that you added Infante in the pen, was really impressed when he came up at the end of 10.
I've been a pretty big proponent...
of trading the expensive bullpen arms if salary really does need to be cleared. Quentin is pretty clearly on the block and I think Buehrle is gone, but if there needs to be more payroll cleared than that, I think Crain, Thornton, Frasor and Ohman should be next on the chopping block. I know we’ve seen a horrific bullpen or two in Sox history, but you can always find decent relievers off the scrap heap and relievers is one thing this minor league system has.
I’m not sure how much those guys would bring back (probably not a ton), but I’d rather trade them than Danks/Floyd.
So you're essentially proposing that we trade everyone with experience in the pen other than Santos?
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
Like I said, if more salary needs to by cut.
I’d rather trade bullpen arms than starters or position players. Other than Q, who would you rather trade (realistically) to clear space?
I put who I would trade.
I think I left it at a realistic payroll. They won’t get shit for Thornton and I’d rather not completely empty the bullpen.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
Oh I agree...
I’m just saying hypothetically if Jerry wants to cut more payroll.
would like to see reed and infante get those innings, spring training usually decides those 11/12 spots anyway
But I like what I’ve read about Marinez, the kid picked up in the MIA trade
you're right, ohman was brought in as the #3 lefty last year that's 2M in extra money right there
You could throw Frasor in at 3.7M, wasn’t impressed by him last year either
Great Read
Seems like it could actually happen. I think we should save the money on the free agent market though and give Lillibridge a shot at starting. He could hit like he did this season, 13 hrs in 186 atbats, maybe he could mash 30 in a season. I want to see him get at least a small chance at the starting role.
Or maybe literally every other year he has played professional baseball is more indicative of his power potential.
a VERY AVERAGE Sox Machine refugee
Sometimes players just boom though.
Mel Ott was a small dude and he could hit homers. I don’t see the harm in giving him at least 250ab’s to test him at the starting.
Yeah, I'd pass on this.
I like him in the super-sub role, but anything more than that and he will be easily exposed.
"Listen, it’s professional sports," Williams said at a hotel restaurant at the general managers’ meetings. "There’s a time for everyone to come. There’s a time for everyone to go. I don’t know if this is his time to go. … I don’t want this to come out the wrong way because he has been as consistent of a performer as you’d ever want over the time he’s been here.
"What I will miss more than that is the person he is. And you guys know what I’m talking about. When you talk about teammates, good teammates, supportive teammates, guys who have fun in the game, know when to be serious, know when to check somebody but know when to make somebody laugh, this is the guy you want. There’s much more that we’re going to miss than just every fifth day from Mark.
"So if it comes down to he’s not here, we got to make the adjustment. That’s just the business of baseball. But it doesn’t mean we like it. It doesn’t mean that’s our preferred course. It doesn’t mean we won’t want him here. Just means this is kind of the way it has to be."
its called negotiation
"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun
I'd like to think he's negotiating with Jerry more than anything.
Batting his eyes must not have worked as well as he hoped.
by mechanical turk on Nov 14, 2011 9:45 PM CST up reply actions
if gonzales quoted it correctly, i don't like that last sentence.
the white sox can’t approach miami in money and probably won’t match years.
Would he be using Miami to set the market?
Maybe he prefers to stay close to home (Midwest) but wants fair market value to do so. Trying not to be naive, but I think ultimately lifestyle and being close to his family will factor in his decision.
by ParisSox on Nov 15, 2011 1:24 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
He gone.
Sad, I am. FKW’sSOJPARAAD. Fucking large contracts.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
williams out!
"michael gilhaney is an example of a man that is nearly banjaxed from the principal of the atomic theory. would it astonish you to hear that he is nearly half a bicycle?" ~~ sergeant pluck
i was led to believe there's a time for everyone to go, too, kenny.
but you seem to be proving that wrong.
Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.
by MarketMaker on Nov 14, 2011 10:40 PM CST up reply actions
I want to believe...so badly...
that Rios is benchable. I want to believe in logic…and unicorns, all at once. But I just get this feeling he’ll be starting on opening day. And this feeling makes me open another beer.
Agreed.
Something tells me conventional manager wisdom gives Rios another shot that I wouldn’t give him. I know Robin doesn’t have conventional manager wisdom, but you have to think he’s going to be very impressionable, especially if TLR comes in to “mentor” him.
"That baseball is the smartest thing out on that field." —Hawk Harrelson
It's not really a problem if Rios is starting on opening day.
If he hits like he did last year and is still starting a few months into the season, that’s a problem.
a VERY AVERAGE Sox Machine refugee
Agreed.
In fact I would contend that he NEEDS to be starting on opening day. You have to give him a chance to give you something for all that money you’re paying him. If he’s shit again, bench him. Same with Dunn. Hopefully at least one of them can provide some value.
I'd hope they give him another chance (on a short least)
I could be totally wrong and I wasn’t paying as much attention as I usually do towards the end of the season, but didn’t he look like he was doing a little bit better towards the end? If he works on the offseason, comes in and has a good spring training then I’d bet they give him another shot. I see no reason not too.
oh, hey guys.
love me some rosterbation
"Rhubarb, if you wouldn’t mind, ram your taint into your monitor as hard as you can." - joewho112
Colin helped me with that part.
I had DeJesus as a 4th type and insurance for slumps and injuries. But Ventura owes nothing to Rios.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
i think you should have stuck with your first instinct.
i think rios will at least start the season in the outfield
Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.
I think he will too. Especially after his September.
Rios on the bench to start the season? No way.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 15, 2011 8:02 AM CST up reply actions
"colin".
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
~

"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
by U-God on Nov 15, 2011 8:35 AM CST up reply actions 6 recs
This is hysterical.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
The Ian Krol link is from when he got suspended for the 2009 season at Neuqua Valley for being "in the presence of alcohol".
Here’s a link for his A’s suspension in 2011. He apparently made a tweet with "a gay slur along with some other offensive language." So he was suspended for two whole seasons, in high school and pro ball, for a couple of stupid things.
"That baseball is the smartest thing out on that field." —Hawk Harrelson
wow. pretty harsh.
think of all the rope Rocker got before he hung himself.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 15, 2011 8:03 AM CST up reply actions
Keep in mind, he was a juvenile and as such has a sealed record
this is all that we know, I’d bet he got into something more signifigant or was getting in trouble more frequently.
Great job, U-G.
Would love to see DeJesus here.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
I've wanted DeJesus here for a few seasons.
Now? I dunno.
by Shoeless In SC on Nov 15, 2011 8:04 AM CST up reply actions
My favorite part is Alex spot in the daily line up you put up there.
If Dayan lives up expectations, this is actually a decent team. Insert Alex, and it becomes awful.
Warning: Read my posts at your own risk!
Mark B gone
Last year we thought Paulie was history.This team was interested and that team was making an offer.It turned out he was being low balled or did not want to go to were the money was better.Ended up back here with a reasonable contract..Mark is similer to Paul.More years is less attractive not more.Location is an important issue,if the money is 10 or 11 mil.per year the Sox could easily do that.Trading Danks or Floyd would provide most of the cash and bring back young talent.It ain’t over till it’s over
KW's quote is fairly damning.
Don’t recall him giving the “adios” speech before the contract was signed. I hope you are right, but I am less optimistic than I was last week.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
he'll always zig when we think he's gonna zag.
by obnoxious american on Nov 15, 2011 9:10 AM CST up reply actions
if by 'zig' you mean 'make a stupid decision' and by 'zag' you mean 'be competent'.
Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.
by MarketMaker on Nov 15, 2011 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
There's a lot of big differences between this contract situation and Konerko's...
the main one being the projected payroll for the upcoming season.
more years is less attractive?
huh?
and the problem is that miami can handily beat the white sox’ offer. arizona (3 years, $30 million) didn’t beat the white sox offer (3 years, $37.5 million).
Less years
Mark has always maintained that he did not want to play until the wheels fell off.The 37.5 mil to Konerko is a very friendly contract.If Miami signs one of the other big fish first does that change things?
I guess I would rather be hopeful.
of the players miami has (allegedly) offered contracts to, buehrle is the only one who is a decent bet to sign there.
pujols is of course a joke. reyes probably is stretch.
there are no players who ever maintain that they want to play until the wheels fell off. and, as i’ve pointed out before, a baseball player isn’t an indentured servant. he can retire after three years even if he has a four year contract and – get this – his employer can’t stop him.
At this point, I just don't see the point in trying to bring back Buehrle.
The only way it made sense to me coming into this offseason was if he was willing to give the Sox some kind of break in terms of a contract, but it doesn’t appear that that is going to be the case. At this point, I think it’s best if they move on without him, take the draft pick, keep Danks and Floyd and give Sale a shot.
The real question there is, what happens with Danks if they hold onto him? If he comes out and plays well, he’s definitely going to insist on testing FA. If the team struggles, a trade makes a lot of sense. If he struggles a bit, maybe he panics and they can get him to accept an extension, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. I guess we’ll see what happens.
by polodude017 on Nov 15, 2011 10:31 AM CST up reply actions
I don't see the point in NOT bringing Buehrle back
If you are passing draft picks to keep a marginally useful player like Frasor, how can you take the draft picks and pass on a really useful player like Buehrle?
Frasor costs $3.7M, Burls will probably cost ten times that.
I’m not saying I liked the Frasor move (I kind of hate it). Just explaining how management can decide to not bring Mark back for a team headed for 2 or 3 80-win seasons.
Well first off...
you can’t compare this to the Frasor move in a vacuum. 1) I’m not convinced Frasor is on the roster come opening day and 2) if he is, I could easily see Crain elsewhere. Now if they are both there come opening day, I’ll agree that that made little to no sense.
And reasons for not bringing Buehrle back? Cost, payroll, other rotation options, age. Take your pick. Pros would be he’s still playing at a high level and that he resonates a lot with the fans, but I think the cons outweigh those. Maybe that would be different if the payroll was in better shape, but its not.
by polodude017 on Nov 15, 2011 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
If you're trying to compete, compete. If you're cutting payroll and rebuilding, do that
Don’t pussy foot around and do the inbetween. Take the picks and the cash or take the players.
Trust me, I would love to do a full rebuild.
I just don’t believe it’s going to happen.
by polodude017 on Nov 15, 2011 12:45 PM CST up reply actions
Here is one
Mark is most likely going to be invovled in a bidding war between teams like The Rangers, The Yankees, The BoSox and other teams looking to spend money. It would take Mark taking a massive paycut to stay here. I see no reason why he would do this. He is making GENERATIONAL WEALTH, meaning this should setup his kids, their kids, their kids, their kids etc etc
It would be a massive risk for the White Sox to sign him to a huge contract. Plus, we saw how quickly fans here turn on players that do not live up to the big money contract.
If the Sox are going to spend lots of cash on a pitcher, than they should spend it on Danks. That would obviously be the much wiser move.
Once again, big assumption that the other GM's will overpay for a soft-tossing craftsman.
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
i would say the 83 million dollars he has already made in his career
is enough to set up his family until the planet earth is no longer habitable by human beings.
"michael gilhaney is an example of a man that is nearly banjaxed from the principal of the atomic theory. would it astonish you to hear that he is nearly half a bicycle?" ~~ sergeant pluck
Yeah, he should leave money on the table
because he should. Nice free-market thesis. Go Occupy Wall Street.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
have you mixed up your medications again?
"michael gilhaney is an example of a man that is nearly banjaxed from the principal of the atomic theory. would it astonish you to hear that he is nearly half a bicycle?" ~~ sergeant pluck
This coming from the man who got mad at Manny Ramirez for retiring.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
Not quite apples to apples.
Try again.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
by winningugly on Nov 16, 2011 12:53 PM CST up reply actions
Lets make money off of nothing producing nothing and steal from everyone else
go Wall Street
It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity
Go Martin Sheen!
Nice use of old material. I thought that was my job.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
Why is Buehrle more likely for Miami than Reyes?
Given Buehrle’s previous comments about the importance of family and seeing his kids grow up, why would he go further away from them? Money has never seemed like a huge deal to him.
To my knowledge, certain things were not known.
-James Murdoch
by 2ndHalfAdjustments on Nov 15, 2011 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
lots of people bring their family with them when they get traded.
by polodude017 on Nov 15, 2011 12:19 PM CST up reply actions
Lots of people die in FL.
MB’s not near death yet. He would be in Miami.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
by winningugly on Nov 15, 2011 12:59 PM CST up reply actions
because i don't believe miami is particularly serious with their offers to the big free agents.
media show for the fans. and i don’t think they’d want to piss off hanley.
WE'RE GONNA GET PUJOLS!
AND REYES! AND THE BLANCO BURLEY!
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
they are all going to the Cubs silly
And Ryno is gonna be manager and Carry and Santo are going to descend down from the heavens
Outstanding.
I loved that moment.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
by winningugly on Nov 16, 2011 12:54 PM CST up reply actions
He did get a better offer from BAL.
Though that is not what is being discussed. I just like diversions.
The sun on the balcony is almost unbearable, worse than the booing fans in Chicago shedding miserable light on his failures at work.
by winningugly on Nov 15, 2011 12:59 PM CST up reply actions
Nice Article.
This is my favorite activity in the off-season. I like the predictions in the article but still haven’t given up on signing Buehrle. How about a three year deal for 5/12.5/12.5 mil. He doesn’t need the money now and our payroll goes down after 2012 and Peavy leaves. Trade Quentin for prospects and forget about DeJesus. Play Rios in LF and hope for the best. About the same payroll ~$105 mil.
In your scenario, Rios would be in right.
Viciedo would shift to left.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
Lillibridge...
Is there a reason we aren’t considering him as a backup infielder? I don’t recall watching him a ton at SS/2B, was he that bad?
the only infield spot he played last year was first base.
it looks like the sox have made their decision on where they can play lillibridge.
Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.
by MarketMaker on Nov 15, 2011 10:23 AM CST up reply actions
Right, but he was primarily a SS coming up.
and he played quite bit of second base if I’m not mistaken.
by polodude017 on Nov 15, 2011 10:25 AM CST up reply actions
He's not good defensively as an infielder.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
butbutbutbut
Viciedo isn’t good in the outfield so what givesssss?
It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity
This is all I wanted to hear.
Didn’t remember him being particularly bad, but that’s all I wanted to know.
by polodude017 on Nov 15, 2011 12:26 PM CST up reply actions
Why not just consider him the backup outfielder and be happy?
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
Because his bat plays a lot better as a middle infielder than a corner OF.
If Beckham went down with an injury or really struggled again and needed some time at AAA, I would probably rather see Lillibridge get some time at 2nd than see Ozzie Martinez start there full-time. Just asking why they don’t seem to even consider him in the infield discussion when he came up playing there.
by polodude017 on Nov 15, 2011 12:21 PM CST up reply actions

by 


























