How the new Collective Bargaining Agreement affects the White Sox (and baseball), Part IV
This is the final post in my four part epic on the new CBA. Read Part I, Part II and Part III. This post will be the catch-all, covering many of the smaller changes. Some of it is really inside baseball stuff and I've put those things towards the end of the post.
Instant replay
Instant replay will be expanded to include fair/foul and "trapped" ball plays. Just another step towards the day when robot umpires rule America. This continues baseball's trend of incrementally implementing review of various plays.
All-Star Game
If selected to the All-Star team, participation in the All-Star Game will be required unless the player is unable to play due to injury or is otherwise excused by the Office of the Commissioner. Appears to be another attempt by Bud to make the All-Star Game mean something.
Drug testing
Commencing in Spring Training 2012, all players will be subject to hGH blood testing for reasonable cause at all times during the year. In addition, during each year, all players will be tested during Spring Training. Starting with the 2012-2013 off-season, players will be subject to random unannounced testing for hGH. The parties have also agreed on a process to jointly study the possibility of expanding blood testing to include in-season collections.
While still leaving a lot to be desired, baseball can continue its claim of having the most comprehensive drug testing regime of any North American professional league. There is apparently some debate whether hGH actually is "performance-enhancing". I recall similar debates about steroids. Regardless, hGH is viewed by the public as performance-enhancing so, if nothing more, it is a good PR move.
Revenue sharing
The net transfer value of the Revenue Sharing Plan will be the same as the current plan. Net transfer amounts will continue to grow with revenue and changes in disparity.
The big change is that the fifteen clubs in the largest markets will be disqualified from receiving revenue sharing by 2016. This obviously makes sense because if you're in a large market, you're doing it wrong if you need welfare from the other owners.
The revenue sharing funds that would have been distributed to the disqualified clubs will be refunded to the payor clubs, except that payor clubs that have exceeded the Competitive Balance Tax (the "luxury tax") threshold two or more consecutive times will forfeit some or all of their refund. This is an additional penalty for exceeding the threshold, though the amounts are so small that the Yankees and Red Sox probably won't even notice.
Luxury Tax
The threshold level of $178 million in 2011 will remain unchanged in 2012 and 2013. The threshold will increase to $189 million for 2014, 2015, and 2016. The tax rate will decrease to 17.5% for clubs that exceed the threshold for the first time, and the rate will increase to 50% for clubs that exceed the threshold for the fourth time or more. Rates will remain the same for clubs that exceed the threshold for the second time (30%) and third time (40%).
Only four teams have ever exceeded the luxury tax threshold: the Red Sox, the Angels, the Tigers and the Yankees. Only the Red Sox and Yankees have exceeded it twice. The Yankees have contributed about 95% of the total contributions.
The rate increase to 50% is obviously directed at only the Yankees and Red Sox, as no team is likely join them in the exclusive four plus club. Having the threshold increase only 6% in the five year life of the CBA is likely to increase the amounts taxed, as it is unlikely that salaries/payrolls will only increase 6% is unlikely
Maple bats
No new players will be permitted to use a low density maple bat during the term of the agreement. So current players are grandfathered in. We've all seen the increased prevalence of bats exploding and shards flying through the air towards players and fans. In 2010, Tyler Colvin was "impaled" by a broken bat (not quite as bad as it sounds but still not good). This is an attempt to minimize such events.
Minor league contracts
Rule XX(B) free agents signing minor league contracts who are not added to the Opening Day roster or unconditionally released 5 days prior to Opening Day shall receive an additional $100,000 retention bonus and the right to opt out on June 1.
Rule XX(B) free agents have major league experience and have been outrighted off a 40-man roster before and, thus, are not under team control if they are not on the 40-man at the end of a season.
Effectively, this makes it cheaper to add such minor league free agents to the 40-man roster than it is to stash them in AAA all season. Obviously, the point is to make it easier for players to find major league jobs, as one might expect teams to release players instead of paying the money.
This is an important change for clubs that are aggressive with minor league free agents (read: small market teams), as they won't be able to keep as much depth in the minors. However, this may result in more players being freely available, so the effect may not be particularly noticeable.
Agents had begun to negotiate opt-out dates into contracts, particularly for the "better" minor league free agents, so this makes that the rule.
The White Sox rarely sign Rule XX(B) free agents to minor league contracts so this change will not have much effect on them.
Fourth option
Now we're really getting inside baseball. The CBA term sheet cryptically refers to "modifications" to fourth option rules. Most players can only be optioned to the minors in no more than each of three seasons before he must pass through waivers to be sent to the minors. An "option year" is what matters. A player could go up and down between the majors and minors ten times in a given season - but that is considered one option. For those unfamiliar with the fourth option (all of you reading this):
A player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience. A full season is defined as being on an active pro roster for at least 90 days in a season. (If a player is put on the disabled list after earning 60 or more days of service in a single season, his time on the DL is counted.) The 90-day requirement means short-season leagues (New-York Penn, Northwest, Pioneer, Appalachian, Gulf Coast, Arizona Rookie, Dominican and Venezuelan Summer Leagues) do not count as full seasons for the purposes of determining eligibility for a fourth option.
Essentially, players who signed major league contracts after being drafted or signed as international free agents (and thus were immediately placed on a team's 40 man roster) and were optioned to the minors in each of three seasons can be optioned a fourth time. Also, players who spent considerable time on the disabled list, such as pitchers who miss the entire season after an arm surgery, may be eligible.
I had previously mused that Dayan Viciedo is a player who would be eligible for a fourth option because he signed a major league contract and used an option year in each of 2009, 2010 and 2011. Agents hate this rule, for obvious reasons - it keeps a player under a team's control longer. It's unclear exactly what is being "modified" but, for example, an elimination of the fourth option for non-injured players would mean that Viciedo could not be sent to the minors again without passing through waivers first. Obviously, the White Sox hope he is in the majors to stay. But there's the axiom about best laid plans.
Outright assignments
The term sheet also refers to modifications to outright assignment rules. A player is "assigned outright" to the minors when he is removed from a team's 40 man roster, requiring him to be placed on waivers, and, if not claimed by another team, is assigned to a team's minor league affiliate. Again, for those unfamiliar:
A player assigned outright to the minor leagues for the first time in his career must accept the assignment. Thereafter, a player has the choice of 1) rejecting the assignment and becoming a free agent immediately, or 2) accepting the assignment and become a free agent at the end of the season if he has not been returned to the 40-man roster.
A player with 3 years of Major League service may refuse an outright assignment and choose to become a free agent immediately or at the end of the season.
A player with 5 years of Major League service who refuses an outright assignment is entitled to the money due according to the terms of his contract.
Like with the fourth option, what is being modified isn't clear. However, since modifications to both fourth option and outright assignment rules are mentioned together in the term sheet, it's likely the modifications will make it more difficult for players to be outrighted, such as by eliminating the rule forcing a player to accept the assignment the first time.
Weekend Waivers
Weekend waivers during the regular season will be implemented beginning in 2012. So if a team asks for waivers for a player on a Thursday, those waivers will now expire on a Saturday instead of a Monday. This makes the process a bit quicker and makes roster management easier.
Tobacco
Players, managers, and coaches will be prohibited from using smokeless tobacco during televised interviews and club appearances. In addition, at any time when fans are permitted in the ballpark, players, managers and coaches must conceal tobacco products (including packages and tins), and may not carry tobacco products in their uniforms or on their bodies. Individuals who violate the policy will be subject to discipline.
Libertarians hate stuff like this because it's rather Orwellian. The retort, of course, is that players are role models, mouth cancer really sucks and if this stops one kid from chewing tobacco, it's good. This doesn't go as far as some wanted - chew has been "banned" in the minors since 1993, for example (though the ban is not all that well-enforced). Seems like a reasonable compromise for the nicotine addicts. And MLB/teams are certainly not the only organizations to prohibit their employees from using tobacco products at work.
Debt Service
MLB has limits on debt and leverage to ensure that teams can make payroll, open their stadiums and do all the other things that are required for a league to operate. Considering the recent bankruptcy filings of the Rangers and Dodgers, this hasn't worked all that well. The changes to these rules are pretty much irrelevant to the fan but I did find this one amusing: the debt of a club’s owner or related party will be covered by the "Debt Service Rule" if the debt is serviced, in whole or in part, using club funds or assets. They should call it the Frank McCourt Rule.
40 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
HGH Testing
Are Nelson Cruz, Josh Hamilton, and Albert Pujos ever going to be the same?
I find the maple bat thing interesting.
some have thought that the ball gets better jump off of the maple. i wonder what long term effects going back to the ash will have.
it also cuts hawk of 50 percent of his material. which should allow him to get back to handing out quality nicknames like the Deacon.
Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.
Probably the only noticeable effect will be fewer plays involving infielders dodging splintered bats.
The lords of dawn are men such as Mr. Lucy.
i dunno. never used a maple. but some who did swore by it.
Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.
And they can still use them.
So… there should be no complaints.
The lords of dawn are men such as Mr. Lucy.
you really should do something about your lack of followers.
Follow @SouthSidelarry * 1,234,109,008 followers
by larry on Nov 24, 2011 11:22 AM CST up reply actions 3 recs
you beat Benford's law this time.
but he’s watching you.
So fast he could hit a ball up the middle and it would hit him in the ass sliding into second.
i only got like 65 followers. bunch of jerks.
lets make that up over 2000. @kenwo4life
Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.
I am thankful for this man... and will toast him at my thanksgiving table!
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/11/yankees-to-sign-freddy-garcia.html
Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.
HGH
they must be doing this because they suspect abuse, or is it just to be seen to be doing it, a pr type thing? not sure here I don’t know much about hgh.
good work though on these mate, jeez it’s so complex, all this contractual stuff. That sort of thing would never stick in euro soccer, which is why they are targeting club turnover with the new ueafa rules. It’s back of a fag packet stuff compared to mlb though. I bet there are some very well paid briefs behind the scenes sorting all this out.
by hoodlight on Nov 24, 2011 12:14 PM CST via mobile reply actions
one of the primary conclusions of the mitchell report was that, after baseball cracked down on steroids, players moved to undectable enhancers like hGH.
numerous players are cited in the mitchell report for using/purchasing it.
Thanks.
Do we know which markets have been designated as 15 largest?
Without any real looking up
I think it’s safe to say the Yankees, Mets, White Sox, Cubs, Dodgers, Angels, and Astros are all in there. That gives us half the teams right there.
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
you're not much of a counter.
So fast he could hit a ball up the middle and it would hit him in the ass sliding into second.
7 out of 15. Would you have prefered I type out half another team's name?
"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"
Per Nate Silver four years ago, TV and attendance markets, in order:
Yankees, Mets, Dodgers (yeah, that ranking may have changed), Angels, Phillies, Cubs, White Sox, Red Sox, Blue Jays, A’s, Giants, Nationals, Braves, Orioles, Tigers.
I imagine the Rangers would be in now and the Orioles out, but who knows.
Link here.
The lords of dawn are men such as Mr. Lucy.
mlb has their own way of measuring "large market"
but i can’t find it right now. i’m sure it’s only different perhaps on the margin. and, of course, market sizes could change a bit by 2016.
Yeah, that was the closest thing I could find to an in-depth study.
The lords of dawn are men such as Mr. Lucy.
Helpful breakdown larry, thanks for doing it. A few reactions:
I can’t express how much I hate the All Star Game stuff. I find it surprising that the owners haven’t shut Budwhack down on this. Exposing top players to risk of injury in an exhibition game their team doesn’t control seems reckless to me. Also, now that the schedule will be more equalized and fifteen teams will be in each league, the idea of using the All Star Game rather than overall record and other tiebreakers to determine home field advantage in the Series has, to me, reached a new level of absurdity.
It also continues to blow my mind that the NL hasn’t adopted the DH; I find it almost embarrassing to the game that they play with different rules.
While I oppose playoff expansion and see it as (further) cheapening the importance of the regular season, I can’t deny the excitement of having two de facto “Game 163”s every year, and I do understand the financial advantages of keeping more teams in the race longer.
"I considered throwing a volley, but since I'm considerably closer to Ford City than Dodge City, I figure it might have been misinterpreted."
by RWShow on Nov 24, 2011 2:03 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Thanks very much for this, larry.
Great explanation with salient examples.
And today we can celebrate our victory around the pike still skewering the rotten skeleton of The Cheat.
by winningugly on Nov 24, 2011 3:04 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Thank you Larry
Your time and effort that goes into publishing this is very much appreciated.
by ParisSox on Nov 24, 2011 5:15 PM CST via mobile reply actions
larry
Do you see this change of scheduling/realignment leading to the NL adopting the DH in the near future? Would that be something they would have to wait for the next CBA to do?
Thanks, I’ll hang up and listen to your answer.
Reporter: I was wondering if at any point in my lifetime the Cubs weren't going to be run by a guy who didn't immediately remind me of failure, confusion, or imminent death
i would think it would only be a problem with the union if they eliminated the DH.
i think this is the final step before mlb decides which it’s going to be, all DH or no DH. i think it will probably be DH, largely because of the union. the push is going to come when an AL team is in a playoff chase. and their last regular season series is in a NL park. since schedules should be balanced, it really doesn’t matter. but the perception regarding must-win games and playing at less than full strength will be persuasive.
larry
This series has been largely incoherent, Thanks for nothing. I feel I know far less than I did prior to reading it.
It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity
by Rhubarb on Nov 24, 2011 9:55 PM CST reply actions 5 recs
Thank you.
"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."
John Kenneth Galbraith
WSJ on the CBA
If there’s any bad news, it’s this: Fans who haven’t pursued coursework in theoretical mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology may have a hard time understanding what’s going on half the time.
Let’s say that next season, under the new rules, your team wants to trade its veteran centerfielder for draft picks. In a bid to rein in excessive spending on unproven talent, baseball’s new collective bargaining agreement will force that team, and whichever team it might do business with, to whip out an algorithm —one that takes into account a bunch of obscure calculations ranging from the likely future signing bonuses for players taken in the draft to how much each team might be allowed to spend on draft picks.
If your head just exploded, don’t be alarmed. If you strip away all the new player classifications, salary slots, taxes and penalties, the bottom line is that baseball’s current leaders are dead-set on limiting the advantages of rich clubs and helping its tired, poor and huddled teams (like the Kansas City Royals) get a more realistic shot at making it to the World Series.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204531404577054464219604008.html
What is this, communist russia?
Let the players Chew whatever (legal) products they want. Nothing wrong with a little Red Man.
UW Alumni 09
by SouthpawsLaundry on Nov 26, 2011 12:54 PM CST reply actions
In major league baseball, Red Man chews you!
Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.
by MarketMaker on Nov 26, 2011 1:25 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
That requires work.
Too much time when you have little impulse control. Porn has killed people’s reading skills.
And today we can celebrate our victory around the pike still skewering the rotten skeleton of The Cheat.
I understand the stipulations
Not being able to chew it at certain constitutes not letting them chew the legal products they want to when they want to.
UW Alumni 09
by SouthpawsLaundry on Nov 30, 2011 3:54 PM CST up reply actions
I read painfully slow all your four takes on the CBA
I knew very little of it…who am I kidding….I knew nothing. Now I can properly use the know a little phrase.
Thanks for your work.
Warning: Read my posts at your own risk!

by 



















