Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Twitter says John Danks, White Sox agree to extension

UPDATE (8:00 p.m.): Jon Heyman confirms: "danks and white sox agree on $65M, 5-yr deal. looks like some fan had it first. lol"

* * *

We've been following the White Sox offseason with the belief that John Danks was on the trading block. Perhaps we've been led astray.

On Twitter, @k0na tweeted the following:

  • danks signs a big contract with the sox. repeat. big.
  • #WhiteSox Danks signs a pretty big contract with the Sox. It's big...
  • #Whitesox 5yr 65mil

Why should we believe @k0na that John Danks has signed a five-year, $65 million extension? Because he's the guy who told us that Edwin Jackson and Mark Teahen were headed to Toronto for Jason Frasor before anybody else, and he has a couple of other trades under his belt, too -- Jon Garland for Orlando Cabrera, and the first Jake Peavy trade.

When he tweeted the Jackson trade in July, I put it at the bottom of a longer post. But given his background, let's give this some front-page play and see if it holds up. Since he doesn't seem to post bad rumors or incorrect news, let's start thinking this out.

If anything more happens tonight, we'll be updating it.

Comment 121 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Do you want this to be true? I thought he would certainly be traded, but maybe I wasn’t reading the right information. Guess we shall see.

Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

Co-Manager/Writer for Pinstripe Alley, Editor/Writer for Blueshirt Banter

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."

"Every day is a great day for hockey."

by Brandon C. on Dec 21, 2011 6:46 PM CST reply actions  

Thats what happens when certain teams lowball us.

Boom. Steak. Dinner.

It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity

by Rhubarb on Dec 21, 2011 6:58 PM CST up reply actions   2 recs

Probably 4yrs 65m guaranteed

5th yr option worth 3m. So he’s paid an avg of 15.5 in 2012-2015.

by striker on Dec 21, 2011 6:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

huh?

Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.

by MarketMaker on Dec 21, 2011 7:02 PM CST up reply actions  

It's reported 5 year $65m deal

1. I doubt the Sox guarantee anyone 5 years
2. I doubt Danks takes an average salary of $13m

So I’m guessing that it’s 4 years guaranteed with a 5th option year (5 years). $65m guaranteed but could be more if the 5th year option is picked up. Think…
2012 $12m
2013 $15m
2014 $17m
2015 $17m
2016 $18m option with $4m buyout

That makes more sense than an average of $13m per year.

by striker on Dec 21, 2011 7:15 PM CST up reply actions  

it really doesn't.

you’re saying john danks signed a contract with a guaranteed average annual salary of $16.25 million. i like danks and all but he shouldn’t be among the top ten or so starting pitchers in salary. particularly since he’s not a free agent and has a year left in arbitration.

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 7:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, I'll be curious to see how the specifics of the contract shake out.

Buehrle and Wilson set the bar pretty high, so it should be interesting to compare.

by polodude017 on Dec 21, 2011 8:13 PM CST up reply actions  

It makes sense

1. The Sox don’t have a pitcher guaranteed past 2012 (Gavin has an option).
2. Buehrle is gone so there is no one to anchor the rotation.
3. The return in the trade market probably wasn’t worth it.
4. You have Peavy and Pierzynski coming off the books after 2012, Konerko after 2013, Dunn and Rios after 2014. So there is money available later.
5. One of Quentin/Thornton will probably be traded this winter.

by striker on Dec 21, 2011 7:18 PM CST reply actions  

You're really throwing 'probably' around liberally. It's a lot of unjustified assumption.

Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.

by MarketMaker on Dec 21, 2011 7:39 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm going off Kenny saying they still need to cut some payroll

Quentin makes the most sense with us having 4 outfielders. Thornton’s name has also come up.

by striker on Dec 21, 2011 7:46 PM CST up reply actions  

jon heyman is confirming deal.

says it won’t be announced until after christmas because danks hasn’t (and won’t) take a physical until then.

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 7:53 PM CST reply actions  

Just saw this on Twitter.

Props to MLBTradeRumors, they actually gave this guy on Twitter credit for breaking the story. I’ll be curious to see how the deal shakes out. Will also be curious to see what they do with the rest of the rotation starting in 2013 (post-Peavy). Figuring Danks, Sale and probably Molina. Do you try to keep Floyd now and maybe Humber? That seems like a pretty solid 5 depending on how Sale and Molina develop.

by polodude017 on Dec 21, 2011 8:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah saw that.

Haha have to wonder who this guy’s source is. I assume he’s just a fan right?

by polodude017 on Dec 21, 2011 8:09 PM CST up reply actions  

lets figure it all out immediately

It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity

by Rhubarb on Dec 21, 2011 8:15 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm game

"There's too many (bleeping) guys on the computer. It's simple. I say that. Pete Rose never watched a computer. Rod Carew never did. All those hitters, they go out and see the ball, hit it and move on." - Ozzie

by usualsuspect on Dec 21, 2011 8:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm still waiting for tenfootmidget to get the credit.

"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"

by U-God on Dec 21, 2011 8:19 PM CST up reply actions  

let him remain semi mythical

I like the thought that k0na is out there, mysteriously and seemingly inexplicably knowing things before everyone else every few months. Like the Haley’s comet of Sox info

by Titan52 on Dec 21, 2011 10:12 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Did not see this coming.

Once it looked like he might not be traded, I thought for sure he was going to leave in free agency. That said, I’m very excited if it’s true.

"That baseball is the smartest thing out on that field." —Hawk Harrelson

by mikecws91 on Dec 21, 2011 8:07 PM CST reply actions  

Big surprise, Keith Law doesn't like it.

via Twitter: “If you’re rebuilding, you trade Danks. If you re-sign Danks, you’re not rebuilding. If you re-sign Danks while rebuilding, you’re lost.”

by polodude017 on Dec 21, 2011 8:22 PM CST reply actions  

so...

So if you’re rebuilding you should trade away your young talent and ride it out with the old guys? It would be different if they extended AJ for 3 more years or gave Konerko another extension. I think the move makes sense whether you are rebuilding or not, unless larry tells me otherwise.

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 8:25 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Ass head

keithlaw (@keithlaw)
12/21/11 8:18 PM
Ozzie just keeps looking better RT @DarkestDiamond: @keithlaw Danks re-signs with the White Sox? What happened to rebuilding?

12/12/07- We'll miss you Andy Gonzalez

by The Deacon on Dec 21, 2011 8:25 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Do I really need to say it?

"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun

by Tdogg on Dec 21, 2011 9:13 PM CST up reply actions  

lol nods head

"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun

by Tdogg on Dec 21, 2011 9:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Where does this put us on salary now? With a "rebuild".

Trying to get below 100m seems pretty remote. No one counted on this. All previous ideas are out the window regarding direction of offseason.

It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity

by Rhubarb on Dec 21, 2011 8:37 PM CST reply actions  

maybe tinfoil-hatted

but that’s an awfully palatable contract… it’s been mentioned that he could be more attractive now than with only a year of control.

by evenyoudorn on Dec 21, 2011 8:40 PM CST up reply actions  

???

Does this mean no Cuban outfielder?

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 8:40 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

where would he play?

this clearly means that jordan is going to be in the outfield next season.

by craigws on Dec 21, 2011 11:21 PM CST up reply actions  

i'm not sure why this is necessarily seen as a totally different direction.

speculation was one of danks or floyd would be traded. now it looks like maybe floyd is the one. considering his contract, he may well have been the more attractive trade piece.

and, purely speculation, but i’d guess the contract is $10M, $12M, $13M, $14M, and $16M. i wouldn’t take the 5/$65M report as that’s what the guaranteed portion is. it may well be 4 years with the 5th as an option.

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 8:42 PM CST up reply actions  

i smell sign and trade

danks’ cost figure is now controlled for 5 years so they can leverage that to get better prospects. and remember jerry’s position on not giving pitchers more than 3 years? he did it once for buehrle but now he is suddenly going to go to 5 years for a pitcher on a team that is rebuilding? something is fishy…

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 8:40 PM CST reply actions  

given what we've seen with pitchers the last few offseasons

why would it make sense for danks to sign a deal that doesn’t have 5 guaranteed years?

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 8:50 PM CST up reply actions  

he loves the sox

wanted to take the deal floyd ended up taking then his agent talked him out of it… some (i admit very few) players actually dont mind not getting top dollar or length of contract if they really like where they are at

by Knoxfire30 on Dec 21, 2011 8:54 PM CST up reply actions  

no. john danks is not a free agent.

pitchers signed to extensions that kick in after their second arbitration season. like chad billingsley. or wandy rodriguez.

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 8:57 PM CST up reply actions  

i understand he's not a free agent

but why would danks and his agent not view wilson as a comparable and his contract as a measuring stick?

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 9:02 PM CST up reply actions  

amazing that this

is the largest deal for a pitcher in team history

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 9:04 PM CST up reply actions  

am i not writing in english?

he’s not a free agent. his comparables are chad billingsley and wandy rodriguez. they got 3 years guaranteed. i’d be skeptical that danks got 5 years.

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 9:08 PM CST up reply actions  

was i writing in greek

when i said “i understand he’s not a free agent?”

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 9:13 PM CST up reply actions  

is your brain capable of understanding

since 2008 john danks: 15.6 WAR, wandy rodriguez 11.7 WAR. If that is a direct comparable then…WOW. Clearly you choose to be simplistic in your thought process and not believe an agent would look at a a guy like CJ Wilson who’s been a starter for 2 years and say “hey my client has proven himself as a starter for twice as long with similar results.” but hey apparently i’m too simple…

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 9:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I think

He is speaking more in terms of market comparables, since that is what is being discussed here. Danks’ situation is not the same as CJ Wilson. Why is this happening.

by daggins on Dec 21, 2011 10:09 PM CST up reply actions  

and what i'm saying is

markets change. agents see contracts players get in the current market and will also use that as a measuring stick and not just limit themselves to markets that were established in previous years. to suggest that an agent wouldn’t try to upsell his client and get more favorable terms (whether it be dollars or guaranteed years) than previous markets would have warranted isn’t realistic.

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

There was only one team Danks could negotiate with this offseason.

1 bidder vs. who knows how many.

Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.

by MarketMaker on Dec 21, 2011 11:11 PM CST up reply actions  

ah, yes. i love it when people just happen to cite the timeframes that support their view.

you wouldn’t want to leave out that aberrant 2008 season for danks.

three seasons prior to signing their respective contracts: danks, 10.4 fWAR. rodriguez, 10.2 fWAR. why did i use the three years prior? because those are the years one uses when projecting players.

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 10:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll have u know I cited 2008

because that was the first year Danks pitched the entire season in the rotation (if you would like we can include 2007 when he didn’t pitch past mid August).

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 10:21 PM CST up reply actions  

sure you did.

and what was the reason you included the season after wandy signed his contract? because that was simpler for you?

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 10:24 PM CST up reply actions  

again, i chose to use 2008 as a starting point

because that was the first time both pitchers went a full season in the rotation. i guess i should’ve included a picture…

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 10:27 PM CST up reply actions  

billingsly

didnt he sign two years away from free agency?

by Knoxfire30 on Dec 21, 2011 10:40 PM CST up reply actions  

it was an extension. didn't replace 1 year contract agreed to avoid 2nd arbitration.

hence the choice of wording: “pitchers signed to extensions that kick in after their second arbitration season.”

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 10:49 PM CST up reply actions  

so is it not reasonable to

start the comparison between 2 pitchers when they both go a full season in their respective rotations?

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 10:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I got this Larry...

No. They were under two totally different contract situations. It would be like comparing D. Rose’s extension to LeBron signing with the Heat.

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 10:45 PM CST up reply actions  

um

“and what was the reason you included the season after wandy signed his contract?”

Basically, Danks and Wandy signed extensions one year apart. Therefore, you have to use the 3 seasons before they signed their respective extensions in order to be consistent. So for Danks that is 09, 10, and 11, whereas for Wandy it is 08, 09 and 10. So you can’t include 08 for Danks or 11 for Wandy.

by daggins on Dec 21, 2011 10:47 PM CST up reply actions  

i told you why i wouldn't do it.

but if you’re going to, it certainly shouldn’t be weighted anywhere near as much as the ensuing three seasons.

hey, look! he asks me a question. and i immediately and directly respond to it. even when he refuses me the same courtesy. i must really be the dumbfuck he thinks i am.

by larry on Dec 21, 2011 10:54 PM CST up reply actions  

a little exaggerated there larry

never did the word dumbfuck come from my keyboard. i clearly stated, i used, admittedly, a very simple starting point of the 2008 season which was the first time danks went an entire season in the rotation for the sake of my comparison between the two. for the sake of my comparison, i was not taking the 3 seasons prior to wandy signing his extension into consideration, that was not my criteria. it was solely based on a timeframe when both were full-time members of their rotations, which for danks did not happen until 2008.

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 11:22 PM CST up reply actions  

clearly yours wasn't a direct comparison

but that was because you chose a flawed timeframe for said comparison.

by craigws on Dec 21, 2011 11:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Smell, think, predict whatever you want

I’m not surprised by this AT ALL.

"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun

by Tdogg on Dec 21, 2011 8:43 PM CST reply actions  

Suprised

My sense was that Danks was resistant to a deal and was interested in testing the market.That appears to be not the case.Most of us would rather see him in Chicago than elsewhere.

by Lil Jimmy on Dec 21, 2011 10:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd say most of actions were such that he was open to a deal.

Starting with the changing of his agent. I just think he felt he was worth more that the Sox were willing to offer at a given point and he had time to increase his value.

"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun

by Tdogg on Dec 21, 2011 10:39 PM CST up reply actions  

sign and trade?

teams weary about controlling danks after next year? not anymore.

"There's too many (bleeping) guys on the computer. It's simple. I say that. Pete Rose never watched a computer. Rod Carew never did. All those hitters, they go out and see the ball, hit it and move on." - Ozzie

by usualsuspect on Dec 21, 2011 8:46 PM CST reply actions  

Nice

Said from the start it made little sense not to keep danks and use the money coming off the books next yaer to finance it. 27 year old lefties with his workload, ability to pitch in the al and at a park like the cell dont grow on trees… well done whitesox.

by Knoxfire30 on Dec 21, 2011 8:52 PM CST reply actions  

agreed

You gotta have at least one guaranteed starter in your rotation. Danks was our best option.

by striker on Dec 21, 2011 8:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Clearly Kenny valued Danks more than other GMs did

And clearly Kenny has Jerry’s ear to secure Danks rather than get back a less-than-desirable set of assets in trade.

This, taken with the Santos trade, is a mixed message about the team’s future. That said, I understand Kenny’s thinking here, even if I disagree with it.

by asinwreck on Dec 21, 2011 8:55 PM CST reply actions  

We now have our anchor

at least it seems like thats what Kenny wants to do. I think Danks and Sale make a good 1-2 punch at the top of the rotation.

by dasox313 on Dec 21, 2011 9:00 PM CST reply actions  

They won't bever be 1-2.

Gotta separate the lefties.

"That baseball is the smartest thing out on that field." —Hawk Harrelson

by mikecws91 on Dec 21, 2011 9:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Ever.

Dammit.

"That baseball is the smartest thing out on that field." —Hawk Harrelson

by mikecws91 on Dec 21, 2011 9:47 PM CST up reply actions  

You know about Danks' career splits right?

So fast he could hit a ball up the middle and it would hit him in the ass sliding into second.

by colintj on Dec 21, 2011 10:01 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Well sure.

But does any manager in the world care?

"That baseball is the smartest thing out on that field." —Hawk Harrelson

by mikecws91 on Dec 21, 2011 10:34 PM CST up reply actions  

There's a theory regarding Danks...

Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.

by MarketMaker on Dec 21, 2011 11:14 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I cannot decide whether I like the idea of rebuilding or not.

And apparently Kenny doesn’t either. Seems like a good deal though for the Sox.

Packers Season

by OznCoop on Dec 21, 2011 10:01 PM CST reply actions  

SSS minds come together today and BAM action is taken.

will be interesting to see the annual breakdown.

by the way they still have money to sign Cespedes.

Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.

by KenWo4LiFe on Dec 21, 2011 10:25 PM CST reply actions  

Check your email.

"Many people need desperately to receive this message: 'I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people do not care about them. You are not alone.'"

by U-God on Dec 21, 2011 10:32 PM CST up reply actions  

!!!

And the Twinkies counter with Jason Marquis! Santa came early!

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 10:33 PM CST up reply actions  

you can find people saying anywhere from 30-60.

hopefully he’s friendly with dayan or alexei and they help sway him. All of the things that people liked about minoso I can see in this guy. He’d be a perfect guy for the Sox who are in desperate need of someone exciting.

Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.

by KenWo4LiFe on Dec 21, 2011 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

based on scouting reports

is he rated similar to alexei and dayan in regards to his plate discipline or lack thereof?

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 11:09 PM CST up reply actions  

no question

but when he first came up he had none. i’m just curious how cespedes is viewed in this regard

by Sox2727 on Dec 21, 2011 11:24 PM CST up reply actions  

you hit yourself off the island. not walk.

so i’m assuming its somewhere near the two of them.

Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.

by KenWo4LiFe on Dec 21, 2011 11:23 PM CST up reply actions  

it's similar, perhaps somewhat better, than ramirez's was. viciedo isn't a good comp because he was much younger than the two 26 year olds

or alleged 26 year olds. from dan szymborski

While projecting based on Cuban stats can be tricky for some of the reasons I outlined above, ZiPS nailed the Alexei Ramirez projection when he signed with the White Sox a few years ago. For 2008 through 2011, ZiPS projected that Ramirez’s line would be .269 AVG/.316 OBP/.418 SLG , and his actual line was .279/.323/.421. So that gives us some hope for the Cespedes projection.

Based on Cespedes’ Cuban career, ZiPS suggests that his profile is similar to players such as Kevin McReynolds, Mike Devereaux and Aaron Rowand. And going forward, it’s not hard to see why Cespedes is so sought after. ZiPS projects him to be clearly better than any center fielder on the market, and while he doesn’t project to be a star in any individual season, he may be able to catch that label in his better seasons.

since it’s insider, i won’t post the full career projection but 2012 is representative of his peak years and it obviously declines per usual from there.

.270/.331/.435 3.3 WAR

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7298446/mlb-statistical-projections-yoenis-cespedes

hunk of salt, of course.

by larry on Dec 22, 2011 12:58 AM CST up reply actions  

He is the anti-Rios?

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 10:46 PM CST reply actions  

That was meant as a reply to KenWo, lo siento

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 10:46 PM CST up reply actions  

absolutely. just take a look at his youtube videos.

but don’t fall in love. he’s mine.

Kenwo4life=ratings. Just call me Mr. USA Today.

by KenWo4LiFe on Dec 21, 2011 10:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Ha!

I’m on the De Aza train, may God have mercy on my soul!

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Tdogg is the conductor of that train.

Some people get so rich they lose all respect for humanity. That's how rich I want to be.

by MarketMaker on Dec 21, 2011 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Is that a good or bad thing?

GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!

by hoosier3 on Dec 21, 2011 11:51 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

What hell do you think?

:-) It’s marvelous.

"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun

by Tdogg on Dec 22, 2011 8:27 AM CST up reply actions  

I was going to say neither or both

It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity

by Rhubarb on Dec 22, 2011 8:31 AM CST up reply actions  

last train i conducted this hard was Alexei

"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun

by Tdogg on Dec 22, 2011 8:44 AM CST up reply actions  

can we stop with the train metaphors?

inferstructure

It came from afar and traveled sedately on, a shrug of eternity

by Rhubarb on Dec 22, 2011 8:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Thats funny

but cmon I didn’t drive a summer long campaign about Hanie. No comparison. And I apologized.

"Rooting for the Twins is just a roundabout way of rooting for a first-round playoff bye for the Yankees." by big_fun

by Tdogg on Dec 23, 2011 6:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to South Side Sox! Please check our new standards and guide to FanPosts/FanShots before posting.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Archerme_small
The Padded Cell: Wait of the World (part 2 of 2)
61y5zkwuutl__sl500__small
The Ballad of bobpuller
Archerme_small
The Padded Cell: Wait of the World (part 1 of 2)
Tedlangue_small
RRRR: Facebook and socialization
Deadhorse_small
White Sox Minor League Update

Recent FanPosts

Small
Reliever-to-Starter Conversions Update
Small
Is Nate Jones for Real?*
Pair-rose-colored__szo0279_small
A Quarter for your thoughts?
Homersimpson_small
BMO 2027: The Sox Machine Cometh
Img_2130_small
RRRR: Lemon drops melting

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Shamelessly Linking My Review of Rick Morrissey's Ozzie Guillen Book
White Sox offer free tickets to CPD officers
A true hitting guru can fix anything
Tweet from Jake Peavy
The White Sox's Black Hole Problem, And Other Observations From A Day Game
Get to the choppa!
Dan Rubenstein heads to Columbus, Ohio to meet Hall of Fame legends Ricky Henderson, Frank Thomas,...
Sox Are Shiftless MFers!
Jake Peavy, AL Pitcher of the Month for the April, is back to 2007 form. While outperforming his preseason projections, is he really up there with the best in baseball? Short answer: yes.

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
A 2 part podcast with Oney Guillen (Ozzie's Son)

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managing Editor

Tedlangue_small Jim Margalus

Editors

Deadhorse_small larry

Sealab_murphy_small colintj

Img_2130_small homesickalien

Omar_small U-God

Authors

10083hb_small KenWo4LiFe

Archerme_small Uribe Down