Spring Training Game #10: White Sox vs. Colorado
Gavin Floyd vs. Taylor Buchholz. Gametime: 2:05 p.m. No TV/Radio (non-internet). Lineups (Live Boxscore; MLB Gameday):
Sox: Erstad, CF; Iguchi, 2B; Konerko, 1B; Dye, RF; Crede, 3B; Pierzynski, C; Uribe, SS; Owens, LF; Floyd, P
Rockies: Taveras, CF; Matsui, 2B; Atkins, 3B; Koshansky, J, 1B; Holliday, LF; Baker, RF; Torrealba, Yor, C; Tulowitzki, SS; Buchholz, P
Scott Merkin wrote yesterday "The White Sox will feature their expected Opening Day lineup, aside from Jerry Owens starting in left field."
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yaaay!
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 8, 2007 1:54 PM CST reply actions
Erstad
Now, now...
Peterbell Tinkerpan
by Toonderstrook on Mar 8, 2007 2:36 PM CST up reply actions
Can we get a declaration...
by Toonderstrook on Mar 8, 2007 3:11 PM CST up reply actions
<nitpick>
wasn't pods the peter pan in palehose6?
</nitpick>
No love for Erstad here but...
I agree...
by Toonderstrook on Mar 8, 2007 8:54 PM CST up reply actions
Boxscore
PO: Erstad (1st base by Graves).
Yeah, Erstad's going out of his way to replace Pods' performance...
http://hiphopnerd.com
frank thomas article by john donovan
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/john_donovan/03/08/thomas/index.html
Welp...
SB: Taveras (4, 2nd base off Floyd/Pierzynski),
Holliday (1, 2nd base off Floyd/Pierzynski),
Spilborghs (1, 2nd base off Logan/Molina),
Matsui (3, 2nd base off Thornton/Molina).
White Sox in WWE...
The OF Situation
Gavin Floyd
did we trade javy to seattle?
:p
Interesting
Couldn't that be deduced without the need for whole separate line under the HR by? Not a big deal really, just wanted to point that out.
by james@lifeinthecell on Mar 8, 2007 7:02 PM CST reply actions
The more I see Erstad playing CF this ST...
And if Ozzie DOES go with Erstad in CF...
CF Erstad
2B Iguchi
DH Thome
1B Konerko
RF Dye
C Pierzynski
3B Crede
LF Mackowiak
SS Uribe
I would rather have Mackowiak leading off versus lefties with Erstad batting eighth but I know that Ozzie views Erstad as a "true leadoff hitter" and doesn't see Mackowiak the same way. Either way, it's a strange situation -- from all accounts, Kenny really likes Anderson but I think Ozzie would rather have Luis Terrero on his roster than Anderson.
That's the April lineup
I agree that it looks like Terrero will be the 4th OF and Anderson in AAA. It really might be good for Anderson -- he can get consistent plying time there while with the Sox he'd be in a platoon. Maybe if he works with his swing some more he can come up and do damage when Erstad and/or Pods go down.
Also, if he can put up some numbers at AAA, maybe the Sox will receive a real prospect in return when they trade Anderson to the Marlins.
by hitlesswonder on Mar 8, 2007 8:53 PM CST up reply actions
Uh-oh
Williams would neither confirm nor deny on Thursday that a ''Rowand Back to the Sox Trade Part III'' was being discussed.
On the Sox end, neither Brian Anderson, Ryan Sweeney or Jerry Owens have distinguished themselves as leading candidates for the center-field job this spring. Yes, Rowand has a dismal .111 batting average this spring, but hitting coach Greg Walker has always understood his swing.
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/289932,CST-SPT-sox09.article
This is
Players to trade...
But
It will take more than Logan
The suntimes article does say Logan would be one of multiple relievers shipped over. And mlbtraderumors throws MacDougal's name out there as the one needed to complete the trade. From a payroll perspective, it makes sense, since losing MacDougal's contract would offset the cost of bringing on Rowand's contract.
Anyway, it would be a mistake IMO. I would be hesitant to deal Logan straight-up for Rowand let alone throw in the Sox best reliever (MacDougal IMO).
Plus, I imagine Rowand would end up platooning with Erstad (grindiest platoon in baseball history?), and so the impact of Rowand and his .750 OPS will be limited to facing LHP. It would be a marginal improvement at best.
by hitlesswonder on Mar 9, 2007 9:19 AM CST up reply actions
well
Oh my god...
I actually think it wouldn't be the worst deal in the world. We have a LOT of bullpen arms right now and that is one area we can afford to move a player away from (and I'm not as high on Logan as a lot of people seem to be). I'm not comfortable with Anderson's offense...nor am I comfortable with any of the other options defensively in CF (Erstad may actually be okay there, but only 27 games in the outfield since 2003 makes me unsure).
Using PECOTA's WARP values for the next 5 years you have Rowand = 14.7 Erstad = 4.5 (all defense) and Anderson = 19.3. From what I've seen of Anderson I actually think PECOTA is overrating him for the upcoming season. If Rowand stays healthy he might actually be the best option for getting at least league average performance in the field and at the plate.
I guess I'm thinking this wouldn't be the worst possible idea. Not the best by any means, but not the worst.
by Brent Brookhouse on Mar 9, 2007 9:14 AM CST up reply actions
I'd rather keep Boone Logan and trade...
There's only one way....
ROWAND
by BIG KLU on Mar 9, 2007 10:09 AM CST reply actions
Sox giving up on BA?
What confuses me is they probably could have traded him instead of Chris Young in the Vazquez trade last year. You'd think KW would have a vested interest in showing he kept the right guy. WTF, does BA have a skanky sister/girlfriend that KW wants to bang???
His skills have nothing
Nobody seems to remember his actions after AJ was clobbered.
he also ranks lowest on my Grinder Chart
Erstad 86
Konerko 80
Pods 78
Thome 77
Crede 73
Dye 70
Gooch 69
Piersynski 60
Uribe 23
Anderson 3
For everyone's reference, Rowand was a 97.
97
Although, since we're all thinking about the same thing -- the grindy-greatness that is Rowand and Erstad -- what would be the all 'grinder' team?
I'll try...
C Brad Ausmus
1B Darin Erstad
2B Mark Grudzielanek
3B Nick Punto
SS David Eckstein
LF Lew Ford
CF Aaron Rowand
RF So Taguchi (weak, I know)
DH Scott Spiezo
Gimmie some help here, folks!
McCray
by Toonderstrook on Mar 9, 2007 11:55 AM CST up reply actions

by 















