Ozzie, Pods use their head, give game to A's
Before the Sox left for Oakland, Ozzie Guillen stated that he had a good feeling about the road trip despite the teams 5-23 slump in whatever they're calling the Coliseum now. On Tuesday night, he managed like he had luck on his side... and it came back to bite him.
Jon Garland used all of Ozzie's luck to get through 7 innings without yielding a run, and I seriously don't know how he did it. I had to keep changing the channel when it was the A's half of the inning because it's no fun to watch a control pitcher struggle with his control, so I literally have no idea how Garland got through 7 innings unscathed. Check that, I did see a couple of highlights of him making nice defensive plays, but the point remains. He looked very pre-'05 out there Tuesday night.
The Sox offense was in full Kason Gabbard/Julian Tavarez mode, doing their best to blow a solid start by a starting pitcher. Ozzie chose to help them out in the 7th.
When Alex Cintron lead off the inning by reaching 3rd on an error, Ozzie chose not to pinch hit for Rob Mackowiak (.239/.296/.351 vs. LHP) with Alan Embree on the mound. Mackowiak had started in place of the struggling Jermaine Dye (.285/.375/.490 vs. LHP), who was joined on the bench by Brian Anderson and Pablo Ozuna. After Mackowiak's predictable out, Juan Uribe, who has been the Sox best batter at getting a run home from third since he arrived in the trade with Colorado, struck out, leaving Ozzie another opportunity to pinch hit, this time for Scott Podsednik (.270/.341/.316 vs. LHP while wearing in a Sox uniform). The Sox would not score.
The score remained 1-0 in the Sox favor entering the bottom of the 9th. Two 89 MPH fastballs from Bobby Jenks later -- Yes, you read that right. Bobby was reading below 90 at the start of his outing Tuesday night -- and the A's had two baserunners. It was at this point I realized that Scott Podsednik, the rag-armed pixie, was still prancing around the outfield while Jermaine Dye and Brian Anderson, who must have contracted leprosy -- That's the only reason I can think of for them sitting on the bench in the 9th inning -- continued to chew sunflower seeds on the bench.
Bobby settled down for the next two batters, touching as high as 93 on the gun. But with two outs, guess where the ball was headed? That's right, just like last year when every Mackowiak start in CF meant we'd see something like "3B -- Molina (1)" in the box score, the ball found the most overrated defensive outfielder in the game. Peter Pan.
Todd walker hit a single in the hole to left field. Pods charged it and put every bit of pixie dust he could muster behind it, and amazingly, cleared the catcher. It was the first time I've ever seen him get the ball to the catcher without hopping it three times. Unfortunately, AJ still had to run and pick it up.
An intentional walk later, Pods was once again the center of attention. Mark Ellis lifted a deep flyball to the left field wall that any decent, non-Canseco outfielder makes the play on easily. Pods tip toed back to the wall. Jumped. Closed his eyes. And the ball hit him in the farking head. Illustration forthcoming.
I'll never understand why Ozzie, who is so willing to play the handedness game with his relief pitchers -- See last night: Pulling Thornton in the 9th to go with Jenks in a what was now a non-save situation -- and was looking to give up outs in the first inning last night against Harden, is unwilling to call for a squeeze (my favorite play in baseball) in the 7th or pinch hit late in a 1-run game with three viable options on the bench. The decision to stick with Pods in the 9th and to refusing to pinch hit for Mackowiak and Pods in the 7th is inexcusable in a game as tight as this.
The offense didn't play well, but Ozzie somehow found a way to be worse.
0 recs |
66 comments
Comments
Good analysis.
Way, way too many mental, strategical and executional errors in the 7 games so far.
by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 12:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The feather in the cap...
by rebstock on Apr 11, 2007 12:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just read the comments in the gamethread
Let's just assume that the beat writers did ask the appropriate questions of Ozzie tonight after the game. The quotes still aren't going to make the morning paper due to deadlines.
So when you pick up your paper and don't see any defense for these dumb moves, you can't automatically assume that the beat guys are giving Ozzie a free pass.
by The Cheat on Apr 11, 2007 12:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ozzie needs new glasses
by southsideirish71 on Apr 11, 2007 1:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lost in translation
by jeeves on Apr 11, 2007 2:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Up until this game
I look forward to the next similar situation to see whether Ozzie learns from his fuckups tonight, or if we start scouting for a new manager.
As far as the ball being over his head, I noted in the gamethread and have yet to see a definitive replay, but I thought the ball bounced off the wall before Canseco-ing numbnuts out there. Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.
P.S. Anyone else wonder what the guys in the clubhouse think about Ozzie's treatment of/aversion to BA?
by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Podsednik's throw, Ozzie?
by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't disagree with anything written here
Johan looked as vulnerable as we're likely to see him, and he 1-hit us.
by chrome on Apr 11, 2007 8:00 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Bottom line, we're 3-4
And the ennui/ambivalence of what direction to lean is reflected in our below-average record. Hope to Christ we break out of our "trading range" and are not a .500 team this year. Above average is always fun, even horrible is fun (tends to get our humor quotient higher), but average +/- a few ponts sucks a lot.
by winningugly on Apr 11, 2007 8:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good teams win these games.
by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
KW's a pretty shrewd baseball guy,
by Happy Felsch on Apr 11, 2007 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Illustration Says It All
by terptime13 on Apr 11, 2007 8:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sad part
In reality I guess I am still pleased with the pitching save the first 2 games. And I still feel confident the offense will come around as long as they remain healthy.
In all seriousness can someone offer a REAL reason on why Ozzie is so hard and down on BA? Its like a freaking stepson situation.
by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 8:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
With Thornton and MacDougal pitching well...
by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 9:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Massive A's Rally.
Check out the video on the A's webpage.
by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 9:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ozzie
What does Ozzie have against Anderson? Not grinder enough? He's our best defensive outfielder. And when you've got a one-run lead in the ninth and pie-thrower in left, you put him in.
But, at least Pods isn't as bad in left as Soriano in center. Has anyone seen him this year so far? He looks like he never he knew center field existed.
by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 9:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn, that picture is too good.
by twoeightnine on Apr 11, 2007 9:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Job?
http://hiphopnerd.com
by hiphopnerd on Apr 11, 2007 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
closing his eyes
by shaftr on Apr 11, 2007 9:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Pan's Throw
by Toonderstrook on Apr 11, 2007 9:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd take Emil Brown over Podsednik...
by SSH2005 on Apr 11, 2007 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Intentional Walk to Travis Buck
Second, it's Travis Buck! He's not Ted Williams up there. And if Ozzie's walking him simply because he's left handed and Ellis is right handed, then why wasn't he applying that "logic" to Mackowiak in the seventh.
The basic questions is: If you don't have enough confidence in your closer to retire Travis Buck when you need one out, why is he your closer? Especially since he appears to have lost 6-8 mph on his fastball?
by Ryno on Apr 11, 2007 10:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm as much a Podsednik-basher as anyone...
You can't score one run (and that on a seeing-eye squibber) and expect to win the game. The A's were better at pretty much every aspect of the game last night - the Sox were extremely lucky to take a one-run lead into the ninth.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Apr 11, 2007 10:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No one is "blaming" Pods
The fact is the Sox SHOULD have won that game 1-0.
by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
Believe me, I want Podsednik out of the lineup as much as anyone, but last night the Sox offense wasn't doing anything. I counted one hard-hit ball all game, and that was a flyout by Konerko. Crede, Pierzynski, and Erstad looked completely lost up there.
I do agree that Mackowiak and Podsednik should have been pinch-hit for, but I wasn't surprised that they weren't. Guillen will play lefty-righty with pitchers all night, but he never pinch-hits to gain a platoon advantage or to get a strong bat in there. Never. The only time you'll see him pinch-hit is during a blowout.
by The Jerry Royster Experience on Apr 11, 2007 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crede
by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha!
by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 10:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
this is how I spent my morning
by zempf on Apr 11, 2007 11:15 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Brilliant.
by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
damn
by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you practice Santeria?
by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His eyes were closed...
by rebstock on Apr 11, 2007 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BA would have been in center
Still I am guessing Erstad makes/has a less embarassing attempt at that play
by CatBrains on Apr 11, 2007 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Erstad
by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was too tired and angry to
Good god. I mean good god man.
by chrome on Apr 11, 2007 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow
now I can see clearly it hit pods in the head first!!!
oh my!
by The Wizard on Apr 11, 2007 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
MS Paint
4 quality starts in a row (3 of which were exceptional (well the results were at least)) and in those 4 games the Sox are 2-2... thanks a lot offense (and Jenks).
Oh and small quibble about the rant... if Jack and DJ are to be trusted, they were saying that there was possibly a sign to Uribe to put on the squeeze in the 7th, but Uribe had to ask for the sign again, so they took it off since it was now obvious they were going to try something.
Everything else however I agree with 100%
by CatBrains on Apr 11, 2007 11:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Response from Mark Gonzalez tribune
"Terry,
The manager was asked about not using Anderson in that situation.
I completely agree with you on the Jenks move. My deadline is midnight,
and I had to re-write the top of the story for the final edition, so I
didn't catch most of Ozzie's post-game session.
Thanks for your interest,
Mark
I feel better now (lol.)
by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 11:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So the question is...
A good manager will make bad team look good...
What has Kenny given us and what do we believe we have? (Personally I believe the talent is there)
by Brush Back on Apr 11, 2007 1:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
As for Pods, he was screwed on a bad call by the home plate ump with Cintron on third in the seventh. He was called out when his bunt bounced up and hit him while he was still in the box.
The ninth is all Ozzie, however. Jenks had poor velocity. He was lucky to get anyone out. Even still, Milton Bradley should have been thrown out at home, especially when he pulls up lame halfway between third and home. Finally, Pods totally lost Ellis' fly at the end of the game. In real time, it looked like it hit the wall. Replays showed it hitting Pods in the head!
OUCH!!!
by thekever on Apr 11, 2007 1:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
2 chances
by RME JICO on Apr 11, 2007 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep...
They (the players)obviously made it to the majors so they have something to offer - however if they are not used in the correct situation/scenario, I can't blame them.
Here we are winning, going into the bottom of the inning, and you don't have your best defense out there. I could have even bought it if BA was in right field to cover Rob's deficiencies. But when he continues to sit on the bench... what's the point, either the ego will deflate, or this will just continue on for this and next year till the contract is complete.
by Brush Back on Apr 11, 2007 1:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ozzie is a f-ing moron for using pods in the 9th
if you want to see all the things in the 9th, here's the video
by The Wizard on Apr 11, 2007 2:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Pods couldn't've caught that ball...
Check the replay again - the ball is coming from the wall when it plunks the flailing Podsednik on the noggin. Ugly? Indisputably. Catchable? No.
by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
dude I dont know what your looking at
by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at the video
by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
P.S. Thanks for the video Wizard
by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it hit that high
by The Cheat on Apr 11, 2007 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The new Zapruder film
by The Actual El Guapo on Apr 11, 2007 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
up and to the right, up...and to the right...
by jeeves on Apr 11, 2007 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
at any rate, that's not the play to be skewering ozzie for. the prior throw is enough and having jenks in there is more than enough.
by larry on Apr 11, 2007 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
reviewing the video
HOWEVER. It looks like the highest it could have hit the wall was at the "1" on the scoreboard. I see some deflection in the padding, and it appears that the ball hit just below the one, right on the border between padding and scoreboard. Then it sends Peter Pan to Never Never land.
Definitely a catchable ball.
by The Cheat on Apr 11, 2007 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Upon further review...
Regarding the rebound missing Pods, high trajectory and downspin.
by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
back, and to the left
by larry on Apr 11, 2007 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That...
by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha
by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
reviewing further...
by thekever on Apr 11, 2007 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ozzie
by The Wizard on Apr 12, 2007 6:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if ozzie didn't had pods in the 9th...
what if we had a good arm in LF at that moment?
the tying run wouldn't have scored and we'd be 5-3 instead of 4-4
by The Wizard on Apr 12, 2007 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I smell dukie, Oz
by suicidesqueeze on Apr 12, 2007 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


























