South Side Sox: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Manny Knocks In Five, D'Backs Drop To Second Bar-right-arrows



Ozzie, Pods use their head, give game to A's

Before the Sox left for Oakland, Ozzie Guillen stated that he had a good feeling about the road trip despite the teams 5-23 slump in whatever they're calling the Coliseum now. On Tuesday night, he managed like he had luck on his side... and it came back to bite him.

Jon Garland used all of Ozzie's luck to get through 7 innings without yielding a run, and I seriously don't know how he did it. I had to keep changing the channel when it was the A's half of the inning because it's no fun to watch a control pitcher struggle with his control, so I literally have no idea how Garland got through 7 innings unscathed. Check that, I did see a couple of highlights of him making nice defensive plays, but the point remains. He looked very pre-'05 out there Tuesday night.

The Sox offense was in full Kason Gabbard/Julian Tavarez mode, doing their best to blow a solid start by a starting pitcher. Ozzie chose to help them out in the 7th.

When Alex Cintron lead off the inning by reaching 3rd on an error, Ozzie chose not to pinch hit for Rob Mackowiak (.239/.296/.351 vs. LHP) with Alan Embree on the mound. Mackowiak had started in place of the struggling Jermaine Dye (.285/.375/.490 vs. LHP), who was joined on the bench by Brian Anderson and Pablo Ozuna. After Mackowiak's predictable out, Juan Uribe, who has been the Sox best batter at getting a run home from third since he arrived in the trade with Colorado, struck out, leaving Ozzie another opportunity to pinch hit, this time for Scott Podsednik (.270/.341/.316 vs. LHP while wearing in a Sox uniform). The Sox would not score.

The score remained 1-0 in the Sox favor entering the bottom of the 9th. Two 89 MPH fastballs from Bobby Jenks later -- Yes, you read that right. Bobby was reading below 90 at the start of his outing Tuesday night -- and the A's had two baserunners. It was at this point I realized that Scott Podsednik, the rag-armed pixie, was still prancing around the outfield while Jermaine Dye and Brian Anderson, who must have contracted leprosy -- That's the only reason I can think of for them sitting on the bench in the 9th inning -- continued to chew sunflower seeds on the bench.

Bobby settled down for the next two batters, touching as high as 93 on the gun. But with two outs, guess where the ball was headed? That's right, just like last year when every Mackowiak start in CF meant we'd see something like "3B -- Molina (1)" in the box score, the ball found the most overrated defensive outfielder in the game. Peter Pan.

Todd walker hit a single in the hole to left field. Pods charged it and put every bit of pixie dust he could muster behind it, and amazingly, cleared the catcher. It was the first time I've ever seen him get the ball to the catcher without hopping it three times. Unfortunately, AJ still had to run and pick it up.

An intentional walk later, Pods was once again the center of attention. Mark Ellis lifted a deep flyball to the left field wall that any decent, non-Canseco outfielder makes the play on easily. Pods tip toed back to the wall. Jumped. Closed his eyes. And the ball hit him in the farking head. Illustration forthcoming.

I'll never understand why Ozzie, who is so willing to play the handedness game with his relief pitchers -- See last night: Pulling Thornton in the 9th to go with Jenks in a what was now a non-save situation -- and was looking to give up outs in the first inning last night against Harden, is unwilling to call for a squeeze (my favorite play in baseball) in the 7th or pinch hit late in a 1-run game with three viable options on the bench. The decision to stick with Pods in the 9th and to refusing to pinch hit for Mackowiak and Pods in the 7th is inexcusable in a game as tight as this.

The offense didn't play well, but Ozzie somehow found a way to be worse.

0 recs | Comment 66 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good analysis.
You can add more bad execution in the 5th when with runners at 1st and 3rd, 1 out, 1 run in AND the infield playing at double play depth, Podsednik strikes out. Never attempted to bunt with the infield back. Had to get 2 runs there! NO-ZZIE BALL at its best.

Way, way too many mental, strategical and executional errors in the 7 games so far.

by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 12:36 AM CDT   0 recs

The feather in the cap...
Beautiful.  MS Paint is just too great.

by rebstock on Apr 11, 2007 12:47 AM CDT   0 recs

Just read the comments in the gamethread
the ones that were posted while I was reading this one.

Let's just assume that the beat writers did ask the appropriate questions of Ozzie tonight after the game. The quotes still aren't going to make the morning paper due to deadlines.

So when you pick up your paper and don't see any defense for these dumb moves, you can't automatically assume that the beat guys are giving Ozzie a free pass.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Apr 11, 2007 12:57 AM CDT   0 recs

goodnight
AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Apr 11, 2007 1:20 AM CDT   0 recs

Ozzie needs new glasses
"Podsednik's been playing good defense, and that ball was way over his head," Sox manager Ozzie Guillen said.

by southsideirish71 on Apr 11, 2007 1:44 AM CDT   0 recs

Lost in translation
He must have meant ON his head...ugh

by jeeves on Apr 11, 2007 2:13 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Up until this game
I'd say Pod's defense has been adequate, not good - but even good defense isn't the same as the best defense possible, of which Pods clearly isn't a part.  And hasn't Ozzie been talking about giving our team the best chance to win since spring training?  Lip service, apparently.

I look forward to the next similar situation to see whether Ozzie learns from his fuckups tonight, or if we start scouting for a new manager.

As far as the ball being over his head, I noted in the gamethread and have yet to see a definitive replay, but I thought the ball bounced off the wall before Canseco-ing numbnuts out there.  Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

P.S. Anyone else wonder what the guys in the clubhouse think about Ozzie's treatment of/aversion to BA?

by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:26 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

What about Podsednik's throw, Ozzie?
Did he have anything to say about the throw?

by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 8:43 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I can't disagree with anything written here
in fact, my first thought in the bottom of the ninth was why the #$@& Pods was still out there. On the other hand, our complete lack of offense lost this game, moreso than the usual Ozzie mismanaging.  This is really troubling how just about everyone, save Uribe, looks completely lost at the plate.  Unfortunately, Uribe, with his all or nothing swing, can't be counted on even if he is swinging the bat alright.  We've faced some good pitchers the last 4-5 games, but none of those pitchers were bringing their best stuff.  

Johan looked as vulnerable as we're likely to see him, and he 1-hit us.

by chrome on Apr 11, 2007 8:00 AM CDT   0 recs

Bottom line, we're 3-4
so I agree with all the positives (well, the pitching is better than the first 2 games) and the negatives (can we hit?  can we manage our way out of a paper bag?).  

And the ennui/ambivalence of what direction to lean is reflected in our below-average record.  Hope to Christ we break out of our "trading range" and are not a .500 team this year.  Above average is always fun, even horrible is fun (tends to get our humor quotient higher), but average +/- a few ponts sucks a lot.

by winningugly on Apr 11, 2007 8:10 AM CDT   0 recs

Good teams win these games.
I'm just curious what Kenny Williams thinks about how the game played out - execution, Podsednik, Guillen, Erstad at .250,......

by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 8:28 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

KW's a pretty shrewd baseball guy,
and I'm sure he gets pretty pissed off at bad execution by both the coaches and managers.  But he's not going to tell Ozzie how to run his team.  At least, not until the offseason, when, if he sees this team regressing (i.e., fewer wins, no playoffs), he decides it's time to find a new manager.  It's not like it hasn't happened in the past, where a manager takes a team to a WS and yet finds himself on the bread line within a couple of years after.

by Happy Felsch on Apr 11, 2007 10:22 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Illustration Says It All
It's clear that the illustration does the whole game justice.
http://stuckinthemiddleofnothing.blogspot.com/

by terptime13 on Apr 11, 2007 8:17 AM CDT   0 recs

Sad part
Is with all that has happened I would have been estatic to be 4-3 after 7 with NO offense. (Actually I'm happy with .500 and above with the first month's schedule)

In reality I guess I am still pleased with the pitching save the first 2 games. And I still feel confident the offense will come around as long as they remain healthy.

In all seriousness can someone offer a REAL reason on why Ozzie is so hard and down on BA? Its like a freaking stepson situation.

by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 8:52 AM CDT   0 recs

With Thornton and MacDougal pitching well...
Guillen better keep Jenks on a short leash. He does not look good. Way too many base runners! Same as last year. EVENTUALLY, that model breaks down.

by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 9:01 AM CDT   0 recs

Massive A's Rally.
Those are the words DJ used to describe the 9th, anyway.

Check out the video on the A's webpage.

http://oakland.athletics.mlb.com/index.jsp?c_id=oak

by ballyb on Apr 11, 2007 9:16 AM CDT   0 recs

Ozzie
better let go of this idiotic pride of his. I don't what he has against BA, but enough already. Terrero's gone, he's down in AAA batting .200 (albeit with 3 HRs) and, I assume, playing his usual shitty defense. Get over it, Ozzie. Play BA. I can say this for certain: Anderson would've a) thrown Bradley out at home or, at the very least, b) caught that ball that utterly confused Pods.

What does Ozzie have against Anderson? Not grinder enough? He's our best defensive outfielder. And when you've got a one-run lead in the ninth and pie-thrower in left, you put him in.

But, at least Pods isn't as bad in left as Soriano in center. Has anyone seen him this year so far? He looks like he never he knew center field existed.

by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 9:17 AM CDT   0 recs

Damn, that picture is too good.
You better not take my job at With Leather.

by twoeightnine on Apr 11, 2007 9:35 AM CDT   0 recs

Job?
You're actually getting paid there?
--------------------------
http://hiphopnerd.com

by hiphopnerd on Apr 11, 2007 9:40 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

closing his eyes
I only saw one replay (enough to see it went off his head), but was Podsednik really closing his eyes?
Go Badgers!

by shaftr on Apr 11, 2007 9:38 AM CDT   0 recs

Pan's Throw
In light of Pan' horrific throw to the plate, just wondered if anyone else saw Emil Brown's of the other day? Who was it that was all over getting Brown? I can't look at the moment, but I'll guess for now that it was SSH2005.
It takes two to lie; one to lie and one to listen.

by Toonderstrook on Apr 11, 2007 9:44 AM CDT   0 recs

Intentional Walk to Travis Buck
What was the point of the intentional walk to Travis Buck.  There were two outs, so there was no need to set up the double play, and the value of getting a force at every base isn't worth the danger of walking in a run when you're pitcher obviously doesn't have his best stuff.  So you put a struggling pitcher into a position where he has no wiggle room and has to throw more balls in the strike zone.  Great thinking.

Second, it's Travis Buck!  He's not Ted Williams up there.  And if Ozzie's walking him simply because he's left handed and Ellis is right handed, then why wasn't he applying that "logic" to Mackowiak in the seventh.  

The basic questions is: If you don't have enough confidence in your closer to retire Travis Buck when you need one out, why is he your closer?  Especially since he appears to have lost 6-8 mph on his fastball?

by Ryno on Apr 11, 2007 10:26 AM CDT   0 recs

I'm as much a Podsednik-basher as anyone...
But it wasn't his fault the Sox lost last night.  The Sox got nothing out of the so-called "heart" of their offense.  Nothing.  Crede and Pierzynski looked like little leaguers up there.

You can't score one run (and that on a seeing-eye squibber) and expect to win the game.  The A's were better at pretty much every aspect of the game last night - the Sox were extremely lucky to take a one-run lead into the ninth.

by The Jerry Royster Experience on Apr 11, 2007 10:38 AM CDT   0 recs

No one is "blaming" Pods
Pods is who he is. I dont blame a skunk for smelling. The issue is Ozzie's use of Pods. If I put a skunk in my basement. I cant complain it stinks down there or worse not acknowledge there is an odor coming from there..

The fact is the Sox SHOULD have won that game 1-0.

by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 10:48 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Well...
The game was tied at 1 when Ellis hit that line drive, and from my vantage point (admittedly, I was 350 feet away), it looked like it hit the wall before it hit Podsednik.  Whatever Jenks was throwing, it wasn't fooling anyone.  They were scalding the ball.

Believe me, I want Podsednik out of the lineup as much as anyone, but last night the Sox offense wasn't doing anything.  I counted one hard-hit ball all game, and that was a flyout by Konerko.  Crede, Pierzynski, and Erstad looked completely lost up there.

I do agree that Mackowiak and Podsednik should have been pinch-hit for, but I wasn't surprised that they weren't.  Guillen will play lefty-righty  with pitchers all night, but he never pinch-hits to gain a platoon advantage or to get a strong bat in there.  Never.  The only time you'll see him pinch-hit is during a blowout.

by The Jerry Royster Experience on Apr 11, 2007 10:57 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Crede
looks like 2004 Crede with those big, long, slow swings. Better have a talk with GW. Soon. And Pierzynski? Maybe he'll stop moaning about the Sox picking up Hall, a right handed backup (please come back soon). I can dropped in the middle of Indo-China in the dead of night and not look as lost as AJ hacking at every low and away pitch lefties toss his way.

by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 11:07 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Ha!
I can't believe I missed this game and all the news replays.  Too funny!  

by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 10:47 AM CDT   0 recs

this is how I spent my morning
As a service to all, here you go:

by zempf on Apr 11, 2007 11:15 AM CDT   0 recs

wow
that is really amazing.  How can your timing be that bad?
Go Badgers!

by shaftr on Apr 11, 2007 11:25 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Brilliant.
Thank you so much!  It's everything I've imagined since reading about it AND MORE!!!

by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 11:25 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

damn
If only we had an outfielder on the bench who gets immaculate reads of the ball off the bat, tht could've been an easy out. If only...

by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 11:28 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Do you practice Santeria?
Well, Ozzie does and that means a spirit told him that it would be better for the world to see that hilarious replay of the ball bouncing off Peter Pan's head on repeat.  Okay?

by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 11:31 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

His eyes were closed...
That is the only way the ball could have bounced off his head AND still had him unflinchingly smash his cabeza into the wall.  He tears a hole in the Bud Light sign.  I'm bookmarking this thread just to make sure I can watch that whenever I feel sad. Too funny.

by rebstock on Apr 11, 2007 11:38 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

BA would have been in center
Erstad in left.

Still I am guessing Erstad makes/has a less embarassing attempt at that play

by CatBrains on Apr 11, 2007 11:41 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Erstad
makes that play. I'm not sure if the dugouts that are positioned in row 15 skewed Ozzie's interpretation, but that was a playable ball. Erstad or Anderson make it. No problem.

by southsider80 on Apr 11, 2007 12:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I was too tired and angry to
realize how bad that was last night.  

Good god.  I mean good god man.

by chrome on Apr 11, 2007 11:27 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

wow
at first I, too, thought the ball hit the wall/scoreboard first and then bounced on pods head

now I can see clearly it hit pods in the head first!!!

oh my!

by The Wizard on Apr 11, 2007 1:31 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

MS Paint
has almost made this terrible loss worth it.

4 quality starts in a row (3 of which were exceptional (well the results were at least)) and in those 4 games the Sox are 2-2... thanks a lot offense (and Jenks).

Oh and small quibble about the rant... if Jack and DJ are to be trusted, they were saying that there was possibly a sign to Uribe to put on the squeeze in the 7th, but Uribe had to ask for the sign again, so they took it off since it was now obvious they were going to try something.

Everything else however I agree with 100%

by CatBrains on Apr 11, 2007 11:49 AM CDT   0 recs

Response from Mark Gonzalez tribune
In my disgust this morning (cuz I have nothing better to do), i fired off emails to a few writers questioning them for not taking Ozzie to task on any of these issues (BA, bullpen use, global warming). To their credit I guess they have been asking or at least think it. His response to me:

"Terry,

The manager was asked about not using Anderson in that situation.

I completely agree with you on the Jenks move. My deadline is midnight,
and I had to re-write the top of the story for the final edition, so I
didn't catch most of Ozzie's post-game session.

Thanks for your interest,

Mark

I feel better now (lol.)

by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 11:52 AM CDT   0 recs

So the question is...
A good team will make a bad manager look good...
A good manager will make bad team look good...

What has Kenny given us and what do we believe we have? (Personally I believe the talent is there)

by Brush Back on Apr 11, 2007 1:05 PM CDT   0 recs

Disagree
Garland looked much better than you describe, especially in the A's fifth.  He pitched beautifully after A's leadoff (Buck) hit a triple.  Painted the corners.  Got two weak ground balls back to the mound.  Last out was a flyout to right.  No runs.  (Too bad it also  happened to the Sox later in the game).

As for Pods, he was screwed on a bad call by the home plate ump with Cintron on third in the seventh.  He was called out when his bunt bounced up and hit him while he was still in the box.

The ninth is all Ozzie, however.  Jenks had poor velocity.  He was lucky to get anyone out.  Even still, Milton Bradley should have been thrown out at home, especially when he pulls up lame halfway between third and home.  Finally, Pods totally lost Ellis' fly at the end of the game.  In real time, it looked like it hit the wall.  Replays showed it hitting Pods in the head!

OUCH!!!

by thekever on Apr 11, 2007 1:22 PM CDT   0 recs

2 chances
Pods actually had two chances to catch the ball.  First on on the fly, and second when it bonked off his head.  He had his eyes closed and jumped way too early.  Still, it should not have came down to Pods making a catch like that.

by RME JICO on Apr 11, 2007 1:44 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yep...
I'm not going to blame the players for not doing things when they should not have been in those positions/situations to start with. I quit that last season when I had to keep watching balls go over the center fielders head. (And it really hit when he said he never felt comfortable out there).

They (the players)obviously made it to the majors so they have something to offer - however if they are not used in the correct situation/scenario, I can't blame them.

Here we are winning, going into the bottom of the inning, and you don't have your best defense out there. I could have even bought it if BA was in right field to cover Rob's deficiencies. But when he continues to sit on the bench... what's the point, either the ego will deflate, or this will just continue on for this and next year till the contract is complete.

by Brush Back on Apr 11, 2007 1:58 PM CDT   0 recs

ozzie is a f-ing moron for using pods in the 9th
kenny gets his share of the blame too, how can you have a $100 mil team and use such a weak arm in LF?

if you want to see all the things in the 9th, here's the video

by The Wizard on Apr 11, 2007 2:05 PM CDT   0 recs

Pods couldn't've caught that ball...
No one could've caught that ball. It bounced off the scoreboard about 5 feet above his head. Unless we've got an outfielder with a 60" vertical leap or the wall-scaling ability of Spiderman, the game was over when the ball left the bat.

Check the replay again - the ball is coming from the wall when it plunks the flailing Podsednik on the noggin. Ugly? Indisputably. Catchable? No.

by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:08 PM CDT   0 recs

dude I dont know what your looking at
That ball was definitely catchable.

by Tdogg on Apr 11, 2007 2:11 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Look at the video
Look at the slo-mo from 1:14 to 1:15.  The ball bounces off the scoreboard right next to the 9 several feet above Pod's head.  Uncatchable.

by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:15 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

If it hit that high
Wouldn't it have bounced so far back in the field of play that it would have missed the pixie's melon?
AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Apr 11, 2007 2:19 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Reviewing...

by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:24 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The new Zapruder film
Hate to say it boys, but Blue Seat is right -- if you stare at the space up and to the right of the 9 you can pretty clearly see the surface of the scoreboard ruffle when the ball makes contact.  Doesn't change the horrible game management by Ozzie, but no one makes that catch.

by The Actual El Guapo on Apr 11, 2007 2:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

yeah
i'm confused about what you - and others on this thread and the media - are talking about. it didn't hit pods first; it hit the wall first and then pods. it certainly was a catchable ball - but i'm not sure how many major leaguers make that play. you'd have to time that perfectly because, from my vantage, it hit very close to the point that's the top of someone's leap. very tough play. could erstad have made that one? i'm not sure, i haven't really seen his leaping ability yet.

at any rate, that's not the play to be skewering ozzie for. the prior throw is enough and having jenks in there is more than enough.

by larry on Apr 11, 2007 2:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

reviewing the video
The ball did hit the wall first.

HOWEVER. It looks like the highest it could have hit the wall was at the "1" on the scoreboard. I see some deflection in the padding, and it appears that the ball hit just below the one, right on the border between padding and scoreboard. Then it sends Peter Pan to Never Never land.

Definitely a catchable ball.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Apr 11, 2007 2:18 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Upon further review...
I stand by my statement.  Unless the mark on the scoreboard next to the 9 at 1:14-1:15 in Wizard's video clip is an anomaly, I really think that ball is too high to be caught.  Anyone have the video in HD?

Regarding the rebound missing Pods, high trajectory and downspin.

by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 2:46 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Here's what I'm looking at
    

by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 3:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

back, and to the left
back, and to the left. back, and to the left.

by larry on Apr 11, 2007 3:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

That...
was one hell of a loogie!

by defensive indifference on Apr 11, 2007 3:35 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Ha
Both of those scenes went thru my head when I was making those screenshots. Too much time on my hands today.

by Blue Seat in Left on Apr 11, 2007 3:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

reviewing further...
Not to mention the flotsam major league parks are using as outfield material these days.  ("Trash bags" in the Metrodome?)  No ball will ricochet off that crap...

by thekever on Apr 11, 2007 3:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

ozzie
on whether BA or Ozuna would have been a better decision out there:

[Nathaniel Whalen]

"I think Podsednik has played pretty good defense. He's not going to catch that ball. He's been playing great in the outfield, playing pretty good, all of a sudden move I have to put Anderson in centerfield. I don't want to change that. Scotty's been playing great. That ball was way over his head on the top of the scoreboard."

by The Wizard on Apr 12, 2007 6:49 PM CDT   0 recs

if ozzie didn't had pods in the 9th...
after watching the video I can't help but remenber one game against detroit last season when the sox hit the ball to LF and tried to score and monroe's (I think) gun nailed the runner at the plate
what if we had a good arm in LF at that moment?
the tying run wouldn't have scored and we'd be 5-3 instead of 4-4

by The Wizard on Apr 12, 2007 6:57 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I smell dukie, Oz
That's bullshit from Ozzie--ANderson would have either thrown out the tying run at home or the runner wouldn't have been sent to begin with, and if it gets to the last batter I say Anderson makes that catch at the wall instead of headbutting it like peter pan out there...glad we won 2 out of 3, but that's a game our manager pissed awy for us, and we all know it's going to be a close race this year.
....STRETCH!

by suicidesqueeze on Apr 12, 2007 10:05 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Chicago White Sox.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dsc00361_small
The Adventures of Don Guillote - In Which Uribe Picks Up Some Slaq
Deadhorse_small
Game #139: White Sox (77-61) @ Indians (67-70)

Recent FanPosts

Twinsfix2_small
Hat Tip from Twins Fan to the White Sox
Small
Sox Yankees tickets
My_richard_small
Top ten Sox moments this year so far
Bricktop_small
Ozzie Thinks Crede is Done
Unforgiven_small
A Bold Idea
Deadhorse_small
Sox Minor League Update: What's that? Uh -- Playoffs? Don't talk about -- playoffs? You kidding me? Playoffs? I just hope we can win a game!
Small
We're Doomed
Small
Should White Sox fans be pulling for the Twins?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Recent FanShots

Jose Contreras' rehab could take up to a year
Bourgeois added to White Sox; Haeger Cut - SUCK ON IT JRE
'Play along on the treadmill to nowhere.'
Sox mum on CQ's outlook
There are limits to change.
Quentin injury worse than originally thought - out until Monday at best
Future of Sports Writing :: USSM
White Sox preparing to expand roster