Did Hawk invent the batting glove?
According to a recent piece on ChiSox.com, Ken "The Hawk" Harrelson is credited with having been the first player to use a batting glove. Wikipedia, citing The Dickson Baseball Dictionary, confirms the the story. However, there's an obvious inconsistency in his account of the incedent.
"Well, necessity is the mother of invention," said Ken "Hawk" Harrelson, when asked about the batting glove's inception back in 1963.
[...]
According to Harrelson, the Yankees had switched from the scheduled right-handed starter to Whitey Ford, the left-handed Hall of Fame-bound hurler. Harrelson began to take batting practice when he noticed a blister forming on his left hand from the 27 holes of golf.
[...]
On the day that Harrelson first used the golf glove to protect his blister, he slugged two home runs. By Harrelson's account, the Yankees' bench jockeys got on him something fierce for using the glove.
He did, however, hit 2 homers in a game started by Whitey Ford in 1964. So perhaps he just remembered the incorrect year, which isn't too bad considering it was over 40 years ago.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
pointed out when he entered the booth in 1982
and added to whitesox.com today
I see I wasn't the first
You have done your homework
He still needs to do a Richard Cory. How embarassin'. He'd have been strung up in Latin America. (Did you see the 3 batters sans gloves are all Latin? And Moises pees on his own hands for strenght, so he COULDN'T wear gloves.)
Old Man, I'm impressed that
i saw your joy last night at discovering someone even more decrepit than you.
I liked the guy who blamed Hawk
LOVE Hawk's suit on the cover
He looks like the type
hawk was the cockiest asshole of his time
YAH!
PS
could you imagine...
Alex Cintron?
I cant
by Gus on Aug 21, 2007 10:47 PM CDT reply actions
considering his OPS in 1968 was 155
Hawk a victim of the "SI Cover Jinx"
The sun shone on Hawk's ass pretty early in life - hope he enjoyed his run.
by winningugly on Aug 22, 2007 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions
ask, get answer
larry (Chicago): Your thoughts on the Jermaine Dye re-signing?
Nate Silver: In the isolate, I think it's probably about a breakeven deal for the White Sox. Dye hasn't had a horrible season -- his numbers are depressed mostly because he didn't hit for any batting average in the first half, and he's actually in the Top 5 in the American League in home runs right now. At least they were able to buy low on him. Still, I think the Sox really blew it by not trading Dye and Buehrle in-season and grabbing some prospects. You can still sign an equivalent player this winter, or you could even re-sign Dye after the rental.

by 


















